Spatial memory and path integration studied by self-driven passive linear displacement. I. Basic properties.

According to path integration, the brain is able to compute the distance of a traveled path. In this research we applied our previously reported method for studying memory of linear distance, a crucial mechanism in path integration; our method is based on the overt reconstruction of a passive transport. Passive transport is a special case of navigation in which no active control is performed. Blindfolded subjects were first asked to travel 2 m forward, in darkness, by driving with a joystick the robot on which they were seated. The results show that all subjects but two undershot this distance, i.e., overestimated their own displacement. Then, subjects were submitted to a passive linear forward displacement along 2, 4, 6, 8, or 10 m, and had to reproduce the same distance, still blindfolded. The results show that the distance of the stimulus was accurately reproduced, as well as stimulus duration, peak velocity, and velocity profile. In this first condition, the imposed velocity profile was triangular and therefore stimulus distance and duration were correlated. In a second condition, it was shown that distance was correctly reproduced also when the information about stimulus duration was kept constant. Here, different velocity profiles were used as stimuli, and most subjects also reproduced the velocity profile. Statistical analyses indicated that distance was not reproduced as a consequence of duration, peak velocity, or velocity profile reproduction, but was uniquely correlated to stimulus distance. The previous hypothesis of a double integration of the otolith signal to provide a distance estimate can explain our results. There was a large discrepancy between the accuracy with which the subjects matched the velocity profiles and that of distance reproduction. It follows that, whereas the dynamics of passive motion are stored and available to further use, distance is independently estimated. It is concluded that vestibular and somatosensory signals excited by passive transport can be used to build a dynamic as well as a static representation of the traveled path. We found a close quantitative similarity between the present findings on distance reproduction and those obtained from active locomotion experiments in which the same paradigm was used. This resemblance suggests that the two types of navigation tasks draw on common physiological processes and extends the relevance of our results to naturally occurring path integration.

[1]  T. Mergner,et al.  Interaction of vestibular and proprioceptive inputs for human self-motion perception , 1992, Neuroscience Letters.

[2]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: assessment of path integration ability. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Acquisition of route and survey knowledge in the absence of vision. , 1990, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  W E Skaggs,et al.  Deciphering the hippocampal polyglot: the hippocampus as a path integration system. , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[5]  E. Poulton Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  J. Thomson Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion? , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Horst Mittelstaedt,et al.  Homing by Path Integration , 1982 .

[8]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Regression effect in psychophysical judgment , 1966 .

[9]  Robert U Muller,et al.  Head direction cells: properties and functional significance , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[10]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Contribution of the otoliths to the calculation of linear displacement. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  A Berthoz,et al.  Spatial memory of body linear displacement: what is being stored? , 1995, Science.

[12]  A Berthoz,et al.  Whole‐Body Rotations Enhance Hippocampal Theta Rhythmic Slow Activity in Awake Rats Passively Transported on a Mobile Robot a , 1996, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  How to find one's way in the labyrinth of path integration models , 1995 .

[14]  L R Young,et al.  The interaction of otolith organ stimulation and smooth pursuit tracking. , 1994, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[15]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Estimation of passive horizontal linear whole-body displacement in humans. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Neurons responding to whole-body motion in the primate hippocampus , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  Alain Berthoz,et al.  Linear Self Motion Perception , 1982 .

[18]  F. Plum Handbook of Physiology. , 1960 .

[19]  A. Etienne,et al.  Limitations in the Assessment of Path Dependent Information , 1988 .

[20]  M. Taussig The Nervous System , 1991 .

[21]  L. Young,et al.  Integration of semicircular canal and otolith information for multisensory orientation stimuli , 1977 .

[22]  Stefan Glasauer,et al.  Idiothetic navigation in Gerbils and Humans , 1991 .

[23]  Horst Mittelstaedt,et al.  Mechanismen der Orientierung ohne richtende Außenreize , 1973 .

[24]  L. Young,et al.  A revised dynamic otolith model. , 1968, Aerospace medicine.

[25]  Roland Maurer,et al.  What is modelling for? a critical review of the models of path integration , 1995 .

[26]  Lawrence Harris,et al.  Cortical Representation of Head-in-Space Movement and Same Psychophysical Experiments on Head Movement , 1992 .

[27]  H Bekkering,et al.  Arthrokinetic information affects linear self-motion perception. , 1995, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.