Patterns in Contraceptive Use Among Women of Mexican Origin in the United States and in Mexico

Nulliparous women of Mexican origin in the United States and Mexico are less likely to use effective contraception than parous women, suggesting limited contraceptive access before childbearing. OBJECTIVE: To examine current contraceptive use by parity among four ethnicity and nativity groups: non-Latina White women in the United States, Mexican-American women in the United States, foreign-born women of Mexican origin in the United States, and Mexican women in Mexico. METHODS: We combined nationally representative data from sexually active women, aged 15–44 years, and not seeking pregnancy from the U.S. National Survey of Family Growth and the Mexican National Survey of Demographic Dynamics. This is a secondary binational analysis. Using multivariable logistic regression, we estimated the prevalence of moderately or most effective contraceptive method use (compared with least effective or no contraceptive method) by ethnicity and nativity and tested the interaction between ethnicity and nativity and parity. RESULTS: Compared with non-Latina White women, women of Mexican origin had lower odds of using a moderately or most effective contraceptive method (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] [95% CI] Mexican-American women: 0.69 [0.54–0.87]; foreign-born women: 0.67 [0.48–0.95]; Mexican women in Mexico: 0.59 [0.40–0.87]). Among parous women, the adjusted probability of using a moderately or most effective contraceptive method was approximately 65% among all four groups. Contraceptive method use did not differ by parity among non-Latina White women. However, parous Mexican-American women were 1.5 times more likely to use moderately or most effective contraceptive methods than nulliparous Mexican-American women (adjusted probability 66.1% vs 42.7%). Parous foreign-born women were 1.8 times more likely to use most or moderately effective contraceptive methods than their nulliparous counterparts (64.5% vs 36.0%), and parous Mexican women in Mexico were three times more likely to use moderately or most effective contraceptive methods (65.2% vs 21.5%). CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that access to effective contraception is limited outside the context of childbearing for women of Mexican origin in the United States and, to an even larger extent, in Mexico.

[1]  B. Darney,et al.  Trends in subdermal contraceptive implant use in Mexico 2009–2018: A population‐based study , 2021, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[2]  K. Shaw,et al.  Socioeconomic Differences Persist in Use of Permanent versus Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: An Analysis of the National Survey for Family Growth, 2006-2010 versus 2015-2017. , 2020, Contraception.

[3]  M. Kavanaugh,et al.  Use of contraception among reproductive-aged women in the United States, 2014 and 2016 , 2020, F&S reports.

[4]  Claire E. Altman,et al.  Immigrant policies as health policies: State immigrant policy climates and health provider visits among U.S. immigrants , 2020, SSM - population health.

[5]  J. Potter,et al.  Quality of postpartum contraceptive counseling and changes in contraceptive method preferences. , 2019, Contraception.

[6]  Youngmin Yi,et al.  Living Arrangements and Household Complexity among Undocumented Immigrants , 2019, Population and Development Review.

[7]  Ayana Douglas-Hall,et al.  The sexual and reproductive health of foreign-born women in the United States☆ , 2018, Contraception.

[8]  J. Jerman,et al.  Contraceptive method use in the United States: trends and characteristics between 2008, 2012 and 2014 , 2017, Contraception.

[9]  J. Potter,et al.  Contraception After Delivery Among Publicly Insured Women in Texas: Use Compared With Preference. , 2017, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  Katy B Kozhimannil,et al.  Structural Racism and Supporting Black Lives - The Role of Health Professionals. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Maria I. Rodriguez,et al.  Adolescents and Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Lessons from Mexico , 2016, Maternal and Child Health Journal.

[12]  N. Menachemi,et al.  Impact of Alabama's immigration law on access to health care among Latina immigrants and children: implications for national reform. , 2014, American journal of public health.

[13]  K. Imai,et al.  Covariate balancing propensity score , 2014 .

[14]  J. Potter,et al.  Patterns of contraceptive use among Mexican-origin women , 2013, Demographic research.

[15]  L. Colarossi,et al.  Factors Associated with Sexual and Reproductive Health Care by Mexican Immigrant Women in New York City: A Mixed Method Study , 2013, Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health.

[16]  F. Knaul,et al.  [The health system of Mexico]. , 2011, Salud publica de Mexico.

[17]  A. Minnis U.S. Migration and Reproductive Health among Mexican Women: Assessing the Evidence for Health Selectivity , 2010 .

[18]  A. Tsui,et al.  Reproductive health service preferences and perceptions of quality among low-income women: racial, ethnic and language group differences. , 2008, Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health.

[19]  Jason Wittenberg,et al.  Making the Most Of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation , 2000 .

[20]  Edward L. Korn,et al.  Analysis of Health Surveys , 1999 .

[21]  Pratt Wf,et al.  The national survey of family growth. , 1977 .