In Situ Biorestoration as a Ground Water Remediation Technique

In situ biorestoration, where applicable, is indicated as a potentially very cost-effective and environmentally acceptable remediation technology. Many contaminants in solution in ground water as well as vapors in the unsaturated zone can be completely degraded or transformed into new compounds by naturally occurring indigenous microbial populations. Undoubtedly, thousands of contamination events are remediated naturally before the contamination reaches a point of detection. The need is for methodology to determine when natural biorestoration is occurring, the stage the restoration process is in, whether enhancement of the process is possible or desirable, and what will happen if natural processes are allowed to run their course. In addition to the nature of the contaminant, several environmental factors are known to influence the capacity of indigenous microbial populations to degrade contaminants. These factors include dissolved oxygen, pH, temperature, oxidation-reduction potential, availability of mineral nutrients, salinity, soil moisture, the concentration of specific pollutants, and the nutritional quality of dissolved organic carbon in the ground water. Most enhanced in situ bioreclamation techniques available today are variations of hydrocarbon degradation procedures pioneered and patented by Raymond and coworkers at Suntech during the period 1974 to 1978. Nutrients and oxygen are introduced through injection wells and circulated through the contaminated zone by pumping one or more producing wells. The limiting factor in remediation technology is getting the contaminated subsurface material to the treatment unit or units, or in the case of in situ processes, getting the treatment process to the contaminated material. The key to successful remediation is a thorough understanding of the hydrogeologic and geochemical characteristics of the contaminated area.

[1]  E. Bouwer,et al.  Transformations of halogenated organic compounds under denitrification conditions , 1983, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[2]  Frances Z. Parsons,et al.  Biotransformation of chlorinated organic solvents in static microcosms , 1985 .

[3]  Jack DeMarco,et al.  Transformations of Tetrachloroethene and Trichloroethene in Microcosms and Groundwater , 1984 .

[4]  R. E. Kallio,et al.  Inability of nitrate to serve as a terminal oxidant for hydrocarbons. , 1957, Science.

[5]  G. Hornberger,et al.  Empirical equations for some soil hydraulic properties , 1978 .

[6]  G. D. Miller,et al.  Microbial metabolism of chlorophenolic compounds in ground water aquifers , 1985 .

[7]  J. Rees,et al.  Biotransformations of selected alkylbenzenes and halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbons in methanogenic aquifer material: a microcosm study. , 1986, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  H. Løkke Leaching of ethylene glycol and ethanol in subsoils , 1984 .

[9]  D. Cooper,et al.  Surface-Active Compounds from Microorganisms , 1980 .

[10]  S. Waksman BACTERIAL NUMBERS IN SOILS, AT DIFFERENT DEPTHS, AND IN DIFFERENT SEASONS OF THE YEAR , 1916 .

[11]  J. Schnoor,et al.  Microbial transformations of substituted benzenes during infiltration of river water to groundwater: Laboratory column studies , 1985 .

[12]  T. E. Ward Characterizing the aerobic and anaerobic microbial activities in surface and subsurface soils , 1985 .

[13]  Peter M. Martin,et al.  MICROBIAL POPULATIONS IN A JET-FUEL-CONTAMINATED SHALLOW AQUIFER AT TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA , 1985 .

[14]  G. D. Miller,et al.  Relationship between the ATP content of subsurface material and the rate of biodegradation of alkylbenzenes and chlorobenzene , 1986 .

[15]  A. Bridié,et al.  Transport of mineral oil components to groundwater—II influence of lime, clay and organic soil components on the rate of transport , 1977 .

[16]  J. Perry Microbial cooxidations involving hydrocarbons. , 1979, Microbiological reviews.