NEURAL ENCODING OF ELECTRICAL SIGNALS a

Research on the cochlear prosthesis is increasingly concerned with the nature of sounds that we encounter and how we might encode them for introduction through a cochlear prosthesis. As we progressively define the physiological and technical limitations on extracting, transforming, and introducing information from these sounds in electrical form, the rules relating the electrical waveforms used to drive a prosthesis and afferent neural activity become a central concern to prosthesis operation. These rules act at the interface between local electrical events and the response of neural membranes, giving rise to questions about stimulus encoding as well as the central processing leading to perception and responses. This is a selective review of published and ongoing research on some topics especially relevant to the encoding of signals presented through a cochlear prosthesis. Its purpose is to summarize in an organized manner information that we view as important for understanding and optimizing prosthesis operation. Data from our laboratories on animal and mathematical models form much of the matrix for the discussion that follows.

[1]  J R Johnstone,et al.  Membrane resistance in endolymphatic walls of the first turn of the guinea-pig cochlea. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  W. Dobelle,et al.  Auditory Prostheses Research with Multiple Channel Intracochlear Stimulation in Man , 1978, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[3]  B M Clopton,et al.  Tissue impedance and current flow in the implanted ear. Implications for the cochlear prosthesis. , 1982, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[4]  R B Diegle,et al.  Studies of enhanced bone healing via electrical stimuli. Comparative effectiveness of various parameters. , 1977, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  B. Pfingst,et al.  RELATION OF COCHLEAR IMPLANT FUNCTION TO HISTOPATHOLOGY IN MONKEYS a , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[6]  L. Duckert,et al.  Acute Morphological Changes in Guinea Pig Cochlea following Electrical Stimulation , 1982, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[7]  B. Clopton,et al.  Estimates of Essential Neural Elements for Stimulation through a Cochlear Prosthesis , 1980, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[8]  S. B. Brummer,et al.  Electrical Stimulation with Pt Electrodes: II-Estimation of Maximum Surface Redox (Theoretical Non-Gassing) Limits , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  D. H. Johnson,et al.  The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  B M Clopton,et al.  Effectiveness of Middle Ear Electrical Stimulation for Activating Central Auditory Pathways , 1982, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[11]  B M Clopton,et al.  Neural mechanisms relevant to the design of an auditory prosthesis. Location and electrical characteristics. , 1982, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[12]  A. Huxley,et al.  The action potential in the myelinated nerve fibre of Xenopus laevis as computed on the basis of voltage clamp data , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  F B Simmons,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. , 1966, Archives of otolaryngology.

[14]  W. House,et al.  Symposium: Cochlear implant, 1978—fact or supposition. Bilateral cochlear implants: Histological findings in a pair of temporal bones , 1979, The Laryngoscope.

[15]  S. B. Brummer,et al.  Electrical Stimulation with Pt Electrodes: AMethod for Determination of "Real" Electrode Areas , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Electrocutaneous Nerve Stimulation-I: Model and Experiment , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Effect of Calcium, Temperature, and Polarizing Currents upon Alternating Current Excitation of Space-Clamped Squid Axons , 1971, The Journal of general physiology.

[18]  Design of the Cochlear Prosthesis: Effects of the Flow of Current in the Implanted Ear , 1980, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.