BackgroundRecording movement of the scapula by non-invasive techniques is fraught with technical difficulty. One convenient method involves placing a single marker on the skin overlying the acromion. The purpose of this study was to compare translatory discrepancies between marker and underlying bone for seven markers affixed to the skin overlying different parts of the scapula.MethodsThe markers were small plastic spheres filled with machine oil, clearly visible on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), placed over seven loci of the scapula, including the acromion, spine, medial border, lateral border, and inferior angle. Nine healthy men participated, assuming three positions in the MRI apparatus: (1) arm at the side of the trunk (starting position); (2) arm in full elevation over the head; and (3) hand placed behind the back at the thoracolumbar area. Visible markers and three loci of the scapula itself were digitized on each MRI scan, enabling calculation of changes in location of each marker relative to the scapula between the starting position and either of the other two positions.ResultsAmong the seven loci examined, the marker placed atop the acromion deviated least from its target, 39 ± 1mm (mean ± standard deviation) for full elevation and 15 ± 1mm for moving the hand behind the back. Markers along the medial border and at the inferior angle exhibited relatively large deviations, on the order of 8mm for full elevation and 3mm for moving the hand behind the back.ConclusionsFor the two movements studied, involving full range of motion in the shoulder complex, translation of the scapula is most accurately recorded if the marker is placed over the acromion, but the systematic error is too large for such tracking to be deemed precise.
[1]
G R Johnson,et al.
A method for the measurement of three-dimensional scapular movement.
,
1993,
Clinical biomechanics.
[2]
G L Smidt,et al.
Dynamic scapulohumeral rhythm: the effects of external resistance during elevation of the arm in the scapular plane.
,
1998,
The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.
[3]
C.G.M. Meskers,et al.
3D shoulder position measurements using a six-degree-of-freedom electromagnetic tracking device.
,
1998,
Clinical biomechanics.
[4]
F. V. D. van der Helm,et al.
Calibration of the "Flock of Birds" electromagnetic tracking device and its application in shoulder motion studies.
,
1999,
Journal of biomechanics.
[5]
T. Cook,et al.
Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement.
,
2000,
Physical therapy.
[6]
A R Karduna,et al.
Dynamic measurements of three-dimensional scapular kinematics: a validation study.
,
2001,
Journal of biomechanical engineering.
[7]
Thomas M Cook,et al.
Translations of the humerus in persons with shoulder impingement symptoms.
,
2002,
The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.
[8]
Andrew Karduna,et al.
Shoulder function and 3-dimensional kinematics in people with shoulder impingement syndrome before and after a 6-week exercise program.
,
2004,
Physical therapy.
[9]
Paula M Ludewig,et al.
Patterns of motion loss in subjects with idiopathic loss of shoulder range of motion.
,
2004,
Clinical biomechanics.