Identifying Uptake, Sessions, and Key Actors in a Socio-technical Network

This paper outlines an implementation of an analytic framework that addresses the need to understand socio-technical networks as intertwined processes at local and network levels of agency distributed across various media. We integrate data sources in a single abstract transcript of events, and identify empirical relationships between these events to build a graph of uptake relations -- how one act builds on another. We then use cohesive sub graph detection to identify "sessions" in the space-time dimensions represented by these graphs. Analysis can then focus on individual sessions and identify key actors within these sessions using sociometrics, or find relationships between sessions that might be vectors for the transmission of ideas or practices. An example is provided using data from the Tapped In educator professional network.

[1]  Franziska Frankfurter,et al.  Sociocultural Studies Of Mind , 2016 .

[2]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[3]  B. Rogoff Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship , 1995 .

[4]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Exposing Chat Features through Analysis of Uptake between Contributions , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[5]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  A unified framework for multi-level analysis of distributed learning , 2011, LAK.

[6]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  A framework for conceptualizing, representing, and analyzing distributed interaction , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[7]  Dan Suthers,et al.  Transcendent communities , 2007, CSCL.

[8]  Mark S. Schlager,et al.  Building Virtual Communities: Evolution of an Online Education Community of Practice , 2002 .

[9]  Traian Rebedea,et al.  A Polyphonic Model and System for Inter-animation Analysis in Chat Conversations with Multiple Participants , 2010, CICLing.

[10]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Discovery of Community Structures in a Heterogeneous Professional Online Network , 2013, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  Françoise Détienne,et al.  Thematic coherence and quotation practices in OSS design-oriented online discussions , 2005, GROUP.

[12]  Jon Trinder,et al.  The Humane Interface: New Directions for Designing Interactive Systems , 2002, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[13]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Theories of Communication Networks , 2003 .

[14]  Umer Farooq,et al.  Sustaining a Community Computing Infrastructure for Online Teacher Professional Development: A Case Study of Designing Tapped In , 2009, Learning in Communities.

[15]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Community detection in graphs , 2009, ArXiv.

[16]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[17]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  OpenOrd: an open-source toolbox for large graph layout , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[18]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[19]  J. Lemke Across the Scales of Time: Artifacts, Activities, and Meanings in Ecosocial Systems , 2000 .

[20]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[21]  Margaret Corbit,et al.  Social network analysis in virtual environments , 2009, HT '09.

[22]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.