Cervical joint position sense: an intra- and inter-examiner reliability study.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the intra- and inter-examiner reliability of neck active joint position sense measurements in different head movements. METHODS Participants had to reproduce actively a specific angle-target in all movements (flexion, right/left rotation, right/left side flexion) from two initial positions, sitting and standing by using a 3D ultrasound-based motion analysis device. Three tests were employed to assess intra-examiner reliability and two examiners used for the inter-examiner reliability. Absolute error (AE) and variable error (VE) indices were used to assess the repositioning accuracy. Intraclass correlation coefficient (I.C.C.(1,1)), standard error of measurement (S.E.M.), smallest detectable difference (S.D.D.) indices were calculated for the analysis of the results. RESULTS Both AE and VE yielded poor to moderate I.C.C.s in any movement and position (-0.01 to 0.50 and 0.01-0.25, respectively). AE presented higher I.C.C.s estimates than the VE but the S.D.D.s were similar for both indices. Regarding the AE, the standing position yielded higher I.C.C. estimates (0.15-0.68) than the sitting position (-0.01 to 0.43) but the S.E.M. (1.2-3.0 degrees and 1.5-3.5 degrees, respectively) and S.D.D. values (123.3-191.8% and 139.9-203.8%, respectively) showed no specific trend in favour of any position. The VE reliability indices showed that standing position was more reliable with less error than sitting. The inter-examiner data showed similar results to the intra-examiner study. CONCLUSIONS The statistical analysis of the present experiments showed that the method employed for measuring cervical joint position sense is unreliable. However, it needs further research to identify the discriminatory power of these tests or if they are clinically unacceptable.

[1]  C. Burnett,et al.  Injury and proprioception in the lower back. , 1994, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[2]  D. Hopper,et al.  Functional measurement of knee joint position sense after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  H V Heikkilä,et al.  Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility, active range of cervical motion, and oculomotor function in patients with whiplash injury. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  A. Mannion,et al.  Range of global motion of the cervical spine: intraindividual reliability and the influence of measurement device , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[5]  Z. Dvir,et al.  Maximal Versus Feigned Active Cervical Motion in Healthy Patients: The Coefficient of Variation as an Indicator for Sincerity of Effort , 2001, Spine.

[6]  G. Jull,et al.  Lumbar spine kinesthesia in patients with low back pain. , 1999, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[7]  Z Dvir,et al.  Reproducibility and instrument validity of a new ultrasonography-based system for measuring cervical spine kinematics. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  K. Lindgren,et al.  Recurrent thoracic outlet syndrome after first rib resection. , 1991, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  N. Strimpakos,et al.  Intratester and intertester reliability of neck isometric dynamometry. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  C. Lantz,et al.  Meta-analysis of normative cervical motion. , 1999, Spine.

[11]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[12]  H Heikkilä,et al.  Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility in patients with whiplash injury. , 1996, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[13]  D Buch,et al.  Clinical validity and stability of active and passive cervical range of motion with regard to total and unilateral uniplanar motion. , 1999, Spine.

[14]  L. Cohen Role of eye and neck proprioceptive mechanisms in body orientation and motor coordination. , 1961, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  G. Jull,et al.  Cervicocephalic kinaesthesia: reliability of a new test approach. , 2001, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[16]  Scott M. Lephart,et al.  The Role of Proprioception in the Management and Rehabilitation of Athletic Injuries , 1997, The American journal of sports medicine.

[17]  D. Connelly,et al.  Reliability and validity of ankle proprioceptive measures. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  M. Revel,et al.  Changes in cervicocephalic kinesthesia after a proprioceptive rehabilitation program in patients with neck pain: a randomized controlled study. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  Mary Ruhl,et al.  Ability to Reproduce Head Position After Whiplash Injury , 1997, Spine.

[20]  M. Johansson,et al.  Effects of acupuncture, cervical manipulation and NSAID therapy on dizziness and impaired head repositioning of suspected cervical origin: a pilot study. , 2000, Manual therapy.

[21]  J. Bagust,et al.  Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility in patients with chronic, nontraumatic cervical spine pain. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  W. Castro,et al.  Noninvasive three-dimensional analysis of cervical spine motion in normal subjects in relation to age and sex. An experimental examination. , 2000, Spine.

[23]  M J Callaghan,et al.  The Measurement of Lumbar Proprioception in Individuals With and Without Low Back Pain , 1998, Spine.

[24]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Motor Control and Learning , 2006 .

[25]  S. Taimela,et al.  The effect of lumbar fatigue on the ability to sense a change in lumbar position. A controlled study. , 1999, Spine.

[26]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[27]  G. Koumantakis,et al.  Thoracolumbar proprioception in individuals with and without low back pain: intratester reliability, clinical applicability, and validity. , 2002, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[28]  J. Harlaar,et al.  The application of generalizability theory to reliability assessment: an illustration using isometric force measurements. , 1993, Physical therapy.

[29]  G. Jull,et al.  A study of five cervicocephalic relocation tests in three different subject groups , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[30]  P. Loisel,et al.  Physical Impairments in Cervicogenic Headache: Traumatic Vs. Nontraumatic Onset , 2001, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[31]  M. Stokes,et al.  Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses , 1998, Clinical rehabilitation.

[32]  Scott M. Lephart,et al.  Proprioception and neuromuscular control in joint stability , 2000 .

[33]  C. André-deshays,et al.  Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility in patients with cervical pain. , 1991, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[34]  J. Jerosch,et al.  Proprioception and joint stability , 2005, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[35]  N. Strimpakos,et al.  Objective Measurements of Neck Function. A Critical Review of their Validity and Reliability , 2001 .

[36]  P. Dolan,et al.  Regional Assessment of Joint Position Sense in the Spine , 1998, Spine.