Predicted distribution of visible and near-infrared radiant flux above and below a transmittant leaf

Abstract The effects of background reflectance, leaf size, and leaf height above the background on upward and downward radiant flux ( φ u and φ d ) from a leaf were investigated using a computer model of a horizontal, isotropically scattering leaf. This research was conducted to determine how these variables influence the light environment above, below and adjacent to a leaf. Leaf spectral properties for big-leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum) were measured in the laboratory and used in the model. Model results were reported as relative radiant flux ( φ r ), defined as a percentage of the light entered into the model. The model showed that upward relative radiant flux φ ur from a leaf was highly dependent on the reflectance of the background and the wavelength of light. The greatest variation in φ ur was observed in the near infrared (NIR). The φ ur also varied depending upon the height of the leaf above the background and the size of the leaf. Leaves were brightest when placed the farthest distance above the background. Small leaves reached maximum brightness at lower heights than larger leaves. Finally, φ ur varied spatially. Leaf edges reflected more light than the leaf center except for leaves positioned very close to the background. Additional studies using the model showed that the intensity of light within a leaf shadow varied spatially, with the greatest downward relative radiant flux φ dr , occurring directly below the center of the leaf. Furthermore, φ dr within the shadow cast by the leaf decreased as the height of the leaf above the background increased. The rate of decrease depended upon the size of the leaf. The smaller the leaf, the greater was the change in φ dr with change in leaf height. These results imply that NIR canopy reflectance, due to leaf transmittance, may be highly dependent upon the reflectance of its background. Furthermore, architecturally different canopies may show different degrees of dependence upon background reflectance in the NIR. These results extend to closed canopies, in which leaf size and spacing may vary the reflectance of the canopy. Finally, these results suggest that the amount of light scattered to the side by leaves increases the amount of NIR light measured from adjacent, unshadowed backgrounds.

[1]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .

[2]  N. Bunnik The multispectral reflectance of shortwave radiation by agricultural crops in relation with their morphological and optical properties , 1978 .

[3]  Larry Biehl,et al.  Field Spectroscopy of Agricultural Crops , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  C. Tucker Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation , 1979 .

[5]  J. M. Norman,et al.  Leaf bidirectional reflectance and transmittance in corn and soybean , 1989 .

[6]  J. Norman,et al.  A Sunfleck Theory for Plant Canopies II. Penumbra Effect: Intensity Distributions along Sunfleck Segments1 , 1971 .

[7]  D. Kimes Modeling the directional reflectance from complete homogeneous vegetation canopies with various leaf-orientation distributions , 1984 .

[8]  A. J. Richardsons,et al.  DISTINGUISHING VEGETATION FROM SOIL BACKGROUND INFORMATION , 1977 .

[9]  A. Huete Soil‐Dependent Spectral Response in a Developing Plant Canopy1 , 1987 .

[10]  R. Jackson,et al.  Suitability of spectral indices for evaluating vegetation characteristics on arid rangelands , 1987 .

[11]  O. Lillesaeter,et al.  Spectral reflectance of partly transmitting leaves: Laboratory measurements and mathematical modeling , 1982 .

[12]  C. Jordan Derivation of leaf-area index from quality of light on the forest floor , 1969 .

[13]  Richard E. Carlson,et al.  An Evaluation of Two Methods for Obtaining Leaf Transmissivity from Leaf Reflectivity Measurements1 , 1971 .

[14]  R. Jackson,et al.  Spectral response of architecturally different wheat canopies , 1986 .

[15]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring the Vernal Advancement and Retrogradation (Green Wave Effect) of Natural Vegetation. [Great Plains Corridor] , 1973 .

[16]  R. Kauth,et al.  The tasselled cap - A graphic description of the spectral-temporal development of agricultural crops as seen by Landsat , 1976 .

[17]  A. Richardson,et al.  Interaction of Light with a Plant Canopy , 1968 .

[18]  H. T. Breece Iii,et al.  Bidirectional scattering characteristics of healthy green soybean and corn leaves in vivo. , 1971, Applied optics.

[19]  N. Goel Models of vegetation canopy reflectance and their use in estimation of biophysical parameters from reflectance data , 1988 .

[20]  Kriebel Kt,et al.  Measured spectral bidirectional reflection properties of four vegetated surfaces. , 1978 .

[21]  J. Norman,et al.  Contrasts among Bidirectional Reflectance of Leaves, Canopies, and Soils , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  R. Jackson,et al.  Spectral response of a plant canopy with different soil backgrounds , 1985 .