Multifocal Attention Filters Targets from Distracters within and beyond Primate MT Neurons' Receptive Field Boundaries

Visual attention has been classically described as a spotlight that enhances the processing of a behaviorally relevant object. However, in many situations, humans and animals must simultaneously attend to several relevant objects separated by distracters. To account for this ability, various models of attention have been proposed including splitting of the attentional spotlight into multiple foci, zooming of the spotlight over a region of space, and switching of the spotlight among objects. We investigated this controversial issue by recording neuronal activity in visual area MT of two macaques while they attended to two translating objects that circumvented a third distracter object located inside the neurons' receptive field. We found that when the attended objects passed through or nearby the receptive field, neuronal responses to the distracter were either decreased or remained unaltered. These results demonstrate that attention can split into multiple spotlights corresponding to relevant objects while filtering out interspersed distracters.

[1]  Jude F. Mitchell,et al.  Spatial Attention Modulates Center-Surround Interactions in Macaque Visual Area V4 , 2009, Neuron.

[2]  R. Klein,et al.  Splitting versus sharing focal attention: comment on Castiello and Umiltà (1992). , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  G. Orban,et al.  The spatial distribution of the antagonistic surround of MT/V5 neurons. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Giovanni Maria Carlomagno,et al.  Heat flux sensors and infrared thermography , 2007, J. Vis..

[5]  R. Gattass,et al.  Cortical visual areas in monkeys: location, topography, connections, columns, plasticity and cortical dynamics , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  T. Horowitz,et al.  Attentional enhancement during multiple-object tracking , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  Paul S Khayat,et al.  Attention Differentially Modulates Similar Neuronal Responses Evoked by Varying Contrast and Direction Stimuli in Area MT , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Spatial Summation Can Explain the Attentional Modulation of Neuronal Responses to Multiple Stimuli in Area V4 , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  S. Treue,et al.  Split of attentional resources in human visual cortex , 2007, Visual Neuroscience.

[11]  M. Barriopedro,et al.  New evidence for the zoom lens model using the RSVP technique , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  B. Motter Neural correlates of attentive selection for color or luminance in extrastriate area V4 , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Attention to both space and feature modulates neuronal responses in macaque area V4. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[15]  N. Lavie,et al.  Failures to Ignore Entirely Irrelevant Distractors , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[16]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[17]  T. Albright,et al.  Adaptive Surround Modulation in Cortical Area MT , 2007, Neuron.

[18]  P Jolicoeur,et al.  Manipulating the shape of distance effects in visual curve tracing: further evidence for the zoom lens model. , 1994, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[19]  B. C. Motter,et al.  Neural correlates of feature selective memory and pop-out in extrastriate area V4 , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  K. Cave,et al.  Split attention as part of a flexible attentional system for complex scenes: comment on Jans, Peters, and De Weerd (2010). , 2010, Psychological review.

[21]  J Allman,et al.  Direction- and Velocity-Specific Responses from beyond the Classical Receptive Field in the Middle Temporal Visual Area (MT) , 1985, Perception.

[22]  Lawrence Huang,et al.  Similar perceptual costs for dividing attention between retina- and space-centered targets in humans. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[23]  F. Bremmer,et al.  Visual receptive field modulation in the lateral intraparietal area during attentive fixation and free gaze. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  D C Van Essen,et al.  Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. I. Selectivity for stimulus direction, speed, and orientation. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Attention Reshapes Center-Surround Receptive Field Structure in Macaque Cortical Area MT , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  D. Wilkin,et al.  Neuron , 2001, Brain Research.

[27]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  Robert Desimone,et al.  Parallel and Serial Neural Mechanisms for Visual Search in Macaque Area V4 , 2005, Science.

[29]  Xin Huang,et al.  Stimulus Dependency and Mechanisms of Surround Modulation in Cortical Area MT , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  Dynamic binding of identity and location information: A serial model of multiple identity tracking , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  D. Heeger,et al.  The Normalization Model of Attention , 2009, Neuron.

[32]  G. Orban,et al.  Shape and Spatial Distribution of Receptive Fields and Antagonistic Motion Surrounds in the Middle Temporal Area (V5) of the Macaque , 1995, The European journal of neuroscience.

[33]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  P. De Weerd,et al.  Visual spatial attention to multiple locations at once: the jury is still out. , 2010, Psychological review.

[35]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Spatial Summation in the Receptive Fields of MT Neurons , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  D. Somers,et al.  Multiple Spotlights of Attentional Selection in Human Visual Cortex , 2004, Neuron.

[37]  D. Heeger,et al.  When size matters: attention affects performance by contrast or response gain , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  Todd S Horowitz,et al.  Distinguishing between parallel and serial accounts of multiple object tracking. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[39]  D. Bradley,et al.  Structure and function of visual area MT. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[40]  S. Treue,et al.  Feature-Based Attention Increases the Selectivity of Population Responses in Primate Visual Cortex , 2004, Current Biology.

[41]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space: An electrophysiological analysis , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Temporal dynamics of neuronal modulation during exogenous and endogenous shifts of visual attention in macaque area MT , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  G. Orban,et al.  Velocity sensitivity and direction selectivity of neurons in areas V1 and V2 of the monkey: influence of eccentricity. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  R. Desimone,et al.  Competitive Mechanisms Subserve Attention in Macaque Areas V2 and V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  田中 啓治 Analysis of Local and Wide-Field Movements in the Superior Temporal Visual Areas of the Macaque Monkey , 1987 .

[47]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Responses in area V4 depend on the spatial relationship between stimulus and attention. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  Carrie J. McAdams,et al.  Effects of Attention on the Reliability of Individual Neurons in Monkey Visual Cortex , 1999, Neuron.

[49]  Arno Villringer,et al.  A Physiological Correlate of the “Zoom Lens” of Visual Attention , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  T. Womelsdorf,et al.  Receptive Field Shift and Shrinkage in Macaque Middle Temporal Area through Attentional Gain Modulation , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  S. A. Hillyard,et al.  Sustained division of the attentional spotlight , 2003, Nature.

[52]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Dynamics of target selection in multiple object tracking (MOT). , 2006, Spatial vision.

[53]  Michael A. Cohen,et al.  The speed of free will , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[54]  R. Andersen,et al.  Center–Surround Antagonism Based on Disparity in Primate Area MT , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  Junying Yuan,et al.  Selective gating of visual signals by microstimulation of frontal cortex , 2022 .

[56]  U. Castiello,et al.  Splitting focal attention. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.