Deep learning is effective for the classification of OCT images of normal versus Age-related Macular Degeneration

Objective The advent of Electronic Medical Records (EMR) with large electronic imaging databases along with advances in deep neural networks with machine learning has provided a unique opportunity to achieve milestones in automated image analysis. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is the most commonly obtained imaging modality in ophthalmology and represents a dense and rich dataset when combined with labels derived from the EMR. We sought to determine if deep learning could be utilized to distinguish normal OCT images from images from patients with Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD). Design EMR and OCT database study Subjects Normal and AMD patients who had a macular OCT. Methods Automated extraction of an OCT imaging database was performed and linked to clinical endpoints from the EMR. OCT macula scans were obtained by Heidelberg Spectralis, and each OCT scan was linked to EMR clinical endpoints extracted from EPIC. The central 11 images were selected from each OCT scan of two cohorts of patients: normal and AMD. Cross-validation was performed using a random subset of patients. Receiver operator curves (ROC) were constructed at an independent image level, macular OCT level, and patient level. Main outcome measure Area under the ROC. Results Of a recent extraction of 2.6 million OCT images linked to clinical datapoints from the EMR, 52,690 normal macular OCT images and 48,312 AMD macular OCT images were selected. A deep neural network was trained to categorize images as either normal or AMD. At the image level, we achieved an area under the ROC of 92.78% with an accuracy of 87.63%. At the macula level, we achieved an area under the ROC of 93.83% with an accuracy of 88.98%. At a patient level, we achieved an area under the ROC of 97.45% with an accuracy of 93.45%. Peak sensitivity and specificity with optimal cutoffs were 92.64% and 93.69% respectively. Conclusions Deep learning techniques achieve high accuracy and is effective as a new image classification technique. These findings have important implications in utilizing OCT in automated screening and the development of computer aided diagnosis tools in the future.

[1]  M. Abràmoff,et al.  Improved Automated Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy on a Publicly Available Dataset Through Integration of Deep Learning. , 2016, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  Hiroshi Murata,et al.  Detecting Preperimetric Glaucoma with Standard Automated Perimetry Using a Deep Learning Classifier. , 2016, Ophthalmology.

[3]  F. Mériaudeau,et al.  Classification of SD-OCT Volumes Using Local Binary Patterns: Experimental Validation for DME Detection , 2016, Journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  Sven Loncaric,et al.  Segmentation of the foveal microvasculature using deep learning networks , 2016, Journal of biomedical optics.

[5]  M. Nassisi,et al.  Microperimetric Assessment after Epiretinal Membrane Surgery: 4-Year Follow-Up , 2016, Journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  Stephen Lin,et al.  Automatic Feature Learning to Grade Nuclear Cataracts Based on Deep Learning , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Sina Farsiu,et al.  Fully automated detection of diabetic macular edema and dry age-related macular degeneration from optical coherence tomography images. , 2014, Biomedical optics express.

[8]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition , 2014, ICLR.

[9]  Heber MacMahon,et al.  Geographic Variation in Radiologist Capacity and Widespread Implementation of Lung Cancer CT Screening , 2014, Journal of medical screening.

[10]  G. Pron,et al.  Optical Coherence Tomography Monitoring Strategies for A-VEGF-Treated Age-Related Macular Degeneration: An Evidence-Based Analysis. , 2014, Ontario health technology assessment series.

[11]  Armin Wolf,et al.  Visual acuity and central retinal thickness: fulfilment of retreatment criteria for recurrent neovascular AMD in routine clinical care , 2014, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[12]  Rob Fergus,et al.  Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks , 2013, ECCV.

[13]  Grant M Comer,et al.  Diffusion of technologies for the care of older adults with exudative age-related macular degeneration. , 2013, American journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[15]  P. Keane,et al.  Evaluation of age-related macular degeneration with optical coherence tomography. , 2012, Survey of ophthalmology.

[16]  B. van Ginneken,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis: how to move from the laboratory to the clinic. , 2011, Radiology.

[17]  James M. Rehg,et al.  Automated macular pathology diagnosis in retinal OCT images using multi-scale spatial pyramid and local binary patterns in texture and shape encoding , 2011, Medical Image Anal..

[18]  Y-Lan Boureau,et al.  Learning Convolutional Feature Hierarchies for Visual Recognition , 2010, NIPS.

[19]  Derek C. Rose,et al.  Deep Machine Learning - A New Frontier in Artificial Intelligence Research [Research Frontier] , 2010, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[20]  Xavier Glorot,et al.  Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks , 2010, AISTATS.

[21]  Srinivas R Sadda,et al.  Evaluation of optical coherence tomography retinal thickness parameters for use in clinical trials for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  Sumit Sharma,et al.  Comparison of spectral-domain versus time-domain optical coherence tomography in management of age-related macular degeneration with ranibizumab. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[23]  P. Patel,et al.  Ophthalmic imaging. , 2014, British medical bulletin.

[24]  G. Ripandelli,et al.  Optical coherence tomography. , 1998, Seminars in ophthalmology.