Varieties of sameness: the impact of relational complexity on perceptual comparisons

The fundamental relations that underlie cognitive comparisons—“same” and “different”—can be defined at multiple levels of abstraction, which vary in relational complexity. We compared response times to decide whether or not two sequentially-presented patterns, each composed of two pairs of colored squares, were the same at three levels of abstraction: perceptual, relational, and system (higher order relations). For both 150 ms and 5 s inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs), both with and without a masking stimulus, decision time increased with level of abstraction. Sameness at lower complexity levels contributed to decisions based on the higher levels. The pattern of comparison times across levels was not predictable solely from encoding times. The results indicated that relations at multiple levels of complexity can be

[1]  G. Halford.  Children's Understanding: The Development of Mental Models , 1993 .

[2]  J. Desmond,et al.  Neural Substrates of Fluid Reasoning: An fMRI Study of Neocortical Activation during Performance of the Raven's Progressive Matrices Test , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[4]  D. Premack,et al.  Spontaneous transfer of matching by infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[5]  A. Tversky.  Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[6]  Robert L. Goldstone.  Similarity, interactive activation, and mapping , 1994 .

[7]  R. K. Thompson,et al.  Language-naive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) judge relations between relations in a conceptual matching-to-sample task. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[8]  David P. Salmon,et al.  Processing of identity and conditional relations in monkeys (Cebus apella) and pigeons (Columba livid) , 1986 .

[9]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  A Structural Account of Global and Local Processing , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Brian Falkenhainer,et al.  The Structure-Mapping Engine: Algorithm and Examples , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[11]  Linda B. Smith.  From global similarities to kinds of similarities: the construction of dimensions in development , 1989 .

[12]  B. Julesz.  Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions , 1981, Nature.

[13]  D. Gentner,et al.  Language and the career of similarity. , 1991 .

[14]  David Premack,et al.  The codes of man and beasts , 1983, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  M R D'Amato,et al.  Symmetry and transitivity of conditional relations in monkeys (Cebus apella) and pigeons (Columba livia). , 1985, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[16]  G. Miller,et al.  Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.

[17]  James K. Kroger,et al.  Rostrolateral Prefrontal Cortex Involvement in Relational Integration during Reasoning , 2001, NeuroImage.

[18]  Anthony A. Wright,et al.  Auditorysame/different concept learning by monkeys , 1990 .

[19]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought , 1994 .

[20]  Mark T. Keane,et al.  The Incremental Analogy Machine: A Computational Model of Analogy , 1988, EWSL.

[21]  B Julesz,et al.  Experiments in the visual perception of texture. , 1975, Scientific American.

[22]  Kazuo Fujita,et al.  An analysis of stimulus control in two-color matching-to-sample behaviors of Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata fuscata) , 1982 .

[23]  Claus Bundesen,et al.  Visual Selective Attention: Outlines of a Choice Model, a Race Model and a Computational Theory , 1998 .

[24]  G. Halford,et al.  A category theory approach to cognitive development , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  R. Shepard.  The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. II , 1962 .

[26]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[27]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Time Course of Comparison , 1994 .

[28]  K. Holyoak,et al.  A symbolic-connectionist theory of relational inference and generalization. , 2003, Psychological review.

[29]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[30]  R. Shepard.  The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I. , 1962 .

[31]  John E. Hummel,et al.  Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. , 1997 .

[32]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Relational similarity and the nonindependence of features in similarity judgments , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  Similarity and analogical reasoning: Similarity and Analogical Reasoning , 1989 .

[34]  K J Holyoak,et al.  Forms of Reasoning: Insight into Prefrontal Functions? a , 1995, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[35]  D. Gentner,et al.  Structural Alignment during Similarity Comparisons , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  Stephen H. Baer.  Mental leaps: Keith J. Holyoak and Paul Thagard Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 265 pp., $24.95, hardcover , 1995 .

[37]  G. F. Tremblay,et al.  The Prefrontal Cortex , 1989, Neurology.

[38]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  Structure and Functions of the Human Prefrontal Cortex , 1996 .

[39]  James K. Kroger,et al.  Recruitment of anterior dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in human reasoning: a parametric study of relational complexity. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  D. Gentner.  Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy* , 1983 .

[41]  K. Holyoak,et al.  A System for Relational Reasoning in Human Prefrontal Cortex , 1999 .

[42]  D. Gentner,et al.  The analogical mind : perspectives from cognitive science , 2001 .

[43]  Melanie Mitchell,et al.  The Copycat project: a model of mental fluidity and analogy-making , 1995 .

[44]  John E. Hummel,et al.  The Proper Treatment of Symbols in a Connectionist Architecture , 2000 .

[45]  J. S. Blum,et al.  Analysis of matching behavior in chimpanzee. , 1948, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[46]  J M Fuster,et al.  Auditory memory cells in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. , 1996, Neuroreport.