Cellular Electrophysiological Changes Induced In Vitro by Radiofrequency Current: Comparison with Electrical Ablation

The purpose of this study was to examine the cellular electrophysiological effects of radiofrequency energy delivery in an in vitro canine epicardial preparation and compare the effects to those of high energy electrical ablation in a similar preparation. Ten joules of direct current energy or 40 volts of radiofrequency energy were delivered by a 6 French 2‐mm tip catheter to the epicardial surface of 2 × 3 cm epicardial strips superfused with Tyrode's solution. Direct current energy delivery produced a crater and central zone of necrosis surrounded by a border zone of viable but damaged tissue that extended up to 10–12 mm from the site of energy delivery. Cellular electrophysiological abnormalities that included a less negative resting membrane potential, decreased peak dV/dT, decreased action potential amplitude, and decreased action potential duration (APD) were approximately linearly related to the distance from the crater edge. In addition, viable and inexcitable cells were frequently interspersed. Between 2 and 5 mm from the crater edge, 36.4% of the cells were inexcitable whereas others displayed normal action potential characteristics. In contrast, radiofrequency current produced a central zone of necrosis surrounded by a smaller border zone. Cellular damage that was qualitatively similar to that produced by direct current energy extended only up to 6–8 mm from the edge of the crater. In addition, severe abnormalities were noted in intracellular potentials recorded within 2 mm of the ablation site, and only minor abnormalities further away. Lesions were relatively homogeneous. Between 2 and 5 mm from the ablation site only 2.6% of the cells were inexcitable (P < 0.05 vs direct current). In conclusion, radiofrequency current produces lesions that are smaller and more homogeneous than those produced by direct current ablation. Although the border zone is small, a region of partially depolarized but viable myocardium is present after radiofrequency current energy delivery. These findings provide a cellular basis for several clinical observations that have been made following radiofrequency current energy delivery.

[1]  S. Huang Advances in Applications of Radiofrequency Current to Catheter Ablation Therapy , 1991, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[2]  M. Scheinman,et al.  Catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction: a report of the percutaneous mapping and ablation registry. , 1984, Circulation.

[3]  F. Morady,et al.  Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia with intracardiac shocks: results in 33 patients. , 1987, Circulation.

[4]  D D Watson,et al.  Electrode radius predicts lesion radius during radiofrequency energy heating. Validation of a proposed thermodynamic model. , 1990, Circulation research.

[5]  J Jenkins,et al.  An Automatic Microcomputer System for Analysis of Monophasic Action Potentials , 1990, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[6]  D. Haines,et al.  Observations on electrode-tissue interface temperature and effect on electrical impedance during radiofrequency ablation of ventricular myocardium. , 1990, Circulation.

[7]  R. Lazzara,et al.  Catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathways (Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) by radiofrequency current. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  M. Haissaguerre,et al.  Catheter ablation of accessory pathways with a direct approach. Results in 35 patients. , 1988, Circulation.

[9]  J. Spear,et al.  The cellular electrophysiologic changes induced by ablation: comparison between argon laser photoablation and high-energy electrical ablation. , 1987, Circulation.

[10]  D D Watson,et al.  Tissue Heating During Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: A Thermodynamic Model and Observations in Isolated Perfused and Superfused Canine Right Ventricular Free Wall , 1989, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[11]  J. Langberg,et al.  Recurrence of conduction in accessory atrioventricular connections after initially successful radiofrequency catheter ablation. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  B B Lerman,et al.  Myocardial injury and induction of arrhythmia by direct current shock delivered via endocardial catheters in dogs. , 1984, Circulation.

[13]  J. Spear,et al.  The cellular electrophysiologic changes induced by high-energy electrical ablation in canine myocardium. , 1986, Circulation.

[14]  J. Langberg,et al.  Diagnosis and cure of the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome or paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias during a single electrophysiologic test. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  S. Deshpande,et al.  Catheter ablation for supraventricular tachycardia. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  M. Haissaguerre,et al.  Closed-chest ablation of retrograde conduction in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  S. Lévy,et al.  Predictors of In‐Hospital Mortality After DC Catheter Ablation of Atrioventricular Junction: Results of a Prospective, International, Multicenter Study , 1991, Circulation.