Glucose effectiveness and insulin sensitivity from the minimal models: consequences of undermodeling assessed by Monte Carlo simulation

The unlabeled (cold) minimal model (MM) and the labeled (hot) minimal model (HMM) are a powerful tool to investigate in vivo metabolism from a standard intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) or hot IVGTT (HIVGTT). They allow to estimate metabolic indexes of the glucose-insulin system, namely glucose effectiveness (GE) and insulin sensitivity (IS) (of uptake and production those of MM, and of uptake only these of HMM). Here, the consequences of the single-compartment glucose kinetics approximation used in the MM's are investigated via Monte Carlo simulation, using a physiologic reference model (RM) of the system, RM allows to generate noisy synthetic plasma concentrations of glucose, tracer glucose, and insulin during IVGTT and HIVGTT, which are then analyzed with MM and HMM. The MM and HMM CE and IS are then compared with the RM ones. Results of 400 runs show that: (1) correlation of MM GE with the RM index is weak; (2) MM IS is well correlated with the RM index, but severely underestimates it; (3) HMM clearance rate is correlated with RM clearance; and (4) HMM IS is well correlated and only slightly overestimates the RM index. These results demonstrate that GE of MM is most affected by the single-compartment approximation and the indexes of HMM are more robust than those of MM.

[1]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  The hot IVGTT two-compartment minimal model: indexes  of glucose effectiveness and insulin sensitivity. , 1997, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[2]  R N Bergman,et al.  Assessment of insulin sensitivity in vivo. , 1985, Endocrine reviews.

[3]  C Cobelli,et al.  Estimation of β-Cell Sensitivity From Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test C-Peptide Data: Knowledge of the Kinetics Avoids Errors in Modeling the Secretion , 1995, Diabetes.

[4]  M. Quon,et al.  Non-Insulin-Mediated Glucose Disappearance in Subjects With IDDM: Discordance Between Experimental Results and Minimal Model Analysis , 1994, Diabetes.

[5]  Ewart R. Carson,et al.  The mathematical modeling of metabolic and endocrine systems : model formulation, identification, and validation , 1983 .

[6]  C. Cobelli,et al.  A Minimal Model of Insulin During Insulin Modified IVGTT: Assessment of Hepatic Insulin Extraction , 1997 .

[7]  P Vicini,et al.  The hot but not the cold minimal model allows precise assessment of insulin sensitivity in NIDDM subjects. , 1996, The American journal of physiology.

[8]  R N Bergman,et al.  Reassessment of Glucose Effectiveness and Insulin Sensitivity From Minimal Model Analysis: A Theoretical Evaluation of the Single-Compartment Glucose Distribution Assumption , 1997, Diabetes.

[9]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  A model of glucose kinetics and their control by insulin, compartmental and noncompartmental approaches , 1984 .

[10]  C Cobelli,et al.  Stable-Label Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test Minimal Model , 1989, Diabetes.

[11]  Richard M Watanabe,et al.  A Comparison Between the Minimal Model and the Glucose Clamp in the Assessment of Insulin Sensitivity Across the Spectrum of Glucose Tolerance , 1994, Diabetes.

[12]  C Cobelli,et al.  Tracer-to-tracee ratio for analysis of stable isotope tracer data: link with radioactive kinetic formalism. , 1992, The American journal of physiology.

[13]  R N Bergman,et al.  Glucose effectiveness assessed under dynamic and steady state conditions. Comparability of uptake versus production components. , 1997, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[14]  D. Finegood,et al.  Reduced glucose effectiveness associated with reduced insulin release: an artifact of the minimal-model method. , 1996, The American journal of physiology.

[15]  C Cobelli,et al.  Minimal Models of Glucose Disappearance: Lessons from the Labelled IVGTT , 1991, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[16]  C Cobelli,et al.  Hepatic glucose production during the labeled IVGTT: estimation by deconvolution with a new minimal model. , 1993, The American journal of physiology.

[17]  D. Owens,et al.  Comparison of Estimates of Insulin Sensitivity From Minimal Model Analysis of the Insulin-Modified Frequently Sampled Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test and the Isoglycemic Hyperinsulinemic Clamp in Subjects With NIDDM , 1995, Diabetes.

[18]  If the minimal model is too minimal, who suffers more: SG or SI? , 1997, Diabetologia.

[19]  R. Rizza,et al.  Effects of Plasma Glucose Concentration on Glucose Utilization and Glucose Clearance in Normal Man , 1981, Diabetes.

[20]  R N Bergman,et al.  Equivalence of the insulin sensitivity index in man derived by the minimal model method and the euglycemic glucose clamp. , 1987, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[21]  Y. Z. Ider,et al.  Quantitative estimation of insulin sensitivity. , 1979, The American journal of physiology.

[22]  C Cobelli,et al.  Estimation of insulin sensitivity and glucose clearance from minimal model: new insights from labeled IVGTT. , 1986, The American journal of physiology.