Pollen dispersal of oilseed rape: estimation of the dispersal function and effects of field dimension

Summary 1. Debate continues regarding the ecological impacts of genetically modified (GM) crops and their coexistence with non-GM crops in Europe. In this debate, quantitative predictions of gene dispersal by pollen are necessary, and as a result numerous plot-to-plot gene flow experiments have been performed with various crops. However, plot-to-plot cross-pollination rates (CPR) depend on spatial configuration of plots, implying that (i) they are difficult to compare among experiments and (ii) functions directly fitted on CPR data are inappropriate for predictions in other spatial contexts. 2. Modelling pollen dispersal via an individual dispersal function (IDF) circumvents these problems by accounting for spatial designs. We detail for oilseed rape how this approach can be used to both estimate an IDF from field data and predict CPR between two neighbouring fields of various sizes and shapes. Predictions were used to investigate the sensitivity of CPR to the family of IDF, the uncertainty in parameter estimates and the effects of field dimensions and isolation distances. 3. We fitted a range of families of IDF, including several types of tails, on previously published data. The best IDF was a fat-tailed power-law function, meaning frequent long-distance dispersal. 4. The choice of IDF appeared crucial when predicting CPR between fields, occasionally being even more important than the distance between fields. Width of the source field and depth of the recipient field were next in importance. When approximated CPR were calculated without considering field dimensions, using distance between field centres gave better performance than field margins. 5. Synthesis and applications. This study demonstrates the value of IDF for quantitative predictions of pollen flow in variable spatial configurations. A spatially explicit model of agro-ecosystems used to define management rules for the commercial release of GM crops in Europe already employs IDF but underestimates long-distance dispersal for oilseed rape. These new parameter estimates will refine the performance of these models. Moreover, the detailed guidelines for estimating an IDF should encourage such statistical analysis of other dispersal data, enabling comparisons of dispersal data obtained for different environments and species and providing new IDF for management models.

[1]  P. Walklate,et al.  A model of pollen–mediated gene flow for oilseed rape , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Linda Hall,et al.  Pollen flow between herbicide-resistant Brassica napus is the cause of multiple-resistant B. napus volunteers1 , 2000, Weed Science.

[3]  Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): The significance of gene flow through pollen transfer , 2002 .

[4]  B. Godelle,et al.  A pollen-dispersal experiment with transgenic oilseed rape. Estimation of the average pollen dispersal of an individual plant within a field , 1998, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[5]  M. Pham-Delègue,et al.  Effects of herbicide‐tolerant transgenic oilseed rape genotypes on honey bees and other pollinating insects under field condtions , 2003 .

[6]  Nathalie Colbach,et al.  GeneSys: a model of the influence of cropping system on gene escape from herbicide tolerant rapeseed crops to rape volunteers: II. Genetic exchanges among volunteer and cropped populations in a small region , 2001 .

[7]  Cyril Dutech,et al.  Using genetic markers to estimate the pollen dispersal curve , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[8]  M. Renard,et al.  RAPESEED (BRASSICA NAPUS L.) PRODUCTIVITY : THE EFFECT OF HONEYBEES (APIS MELLIFERA L.) AND DIFFERENT POLLINATION CONDITIONS IN CAGE AND FIELD TESTS , 1988 .

[9]  A. Raybould,et al.  Genetically modified crops and hybridization with wild relatives: a UK perspective , 1993 .

[10]  C. Lavigne,et al.  High diversity of oilseed rape pollen clouds over an agro‐ecosystem indicates long‐distance dispersal , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[11]  J. Sweet,et al.  Introgression from Genetically Modified Plants into Wild Relatives , 2004 .

[12]  Philip J. Dale,et al.  Frequency and distance of pollen dispersal from transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus) , 1993, Transgenic Research.

[13]  James S. Clark,et al.  Invasion by Extremes: Population Spread with Variation in Dispersal and Reproduction , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[14]  M. A. Patrick,et al.  Aerodynamics of wind pollination in a zoophilous flower, Brassica napus , 2004 .

[15]  A. Gray Ecology and government policies: the GM crop debate* , 2004 .

[16]  S. Engen,et al.  Stochastic Dispersal Processes in Plant Populations , 1997, Theoretical population biology.

[17]  J. Beringer Releasing genetically modified organisms: will any harm outweigh any advantage? , 2000 .

[18]  J. W. Crawford,et al.  Regional patterns of gene flow and its consequence for GM oilseed rape , 1999 .

[19]  Jeremy Sweet,et al.  Hybridization Between Brassica napus and B. rapa on a National Scale in the United Kingdom , 2003, Science.

[20]  J. Osborne,et al.  A model of pollinator‐mediated gene flow between plant populations with numerical solutions for bumblebees pollinating oilseed rape , 2002 .

[21]  X. Reboud Effect of a gap on gene flow between otherwise adjacent transgenic Brassica napus crops , 2003, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[22]  J. Osborne,et al.  The effect of patch size and separation on bumblebee foraging in oilseed rape: implications for gene flow , 2004 .

[23]  N. Hautekèete,et al.  Transgenic weed beets: possible, probable, avoidable? , 2002 .

[24]  Hugh J. Beckie,et al.  GENE FLOW IN COMMERCIAL FIELDS OF HERBICIDE‐RESISTANT CANOLA (BRASSICA NAPUS) , 2003 .

[25]  Nathalie Colbach,et al.  GENESYS : a model of the influence of cropping system on gene escape from herbicide tolerant rapeseed crops to rape volunteers. I. Temporal evolution of a population of rapeseed volunteers in a field , 2001 .

[26]  Robin P. White,et al.  The pollination requirements of oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.) , 1986, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[27]  P. Gouyon,et al.  Potential and limits of modelling to predict the impact of transgenic crops in wild species. , 2004 .

[28]  M. J. Wilkinson,et al.  Risks from transgenic crops , 1996, Nature.

[29]  E. Shields,et al.  An aerobiological framework for assessing cross-pollination in maize , 2003 .

[30]  Philip J. Dale,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of isolation distances for field plots of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) using a herbicide‐resistance transgene as a selectable marker , 1995 .

[31]  Christopher Preston,et al.  Pollen-Mediated Movement of Herbicide Resistance Between Commercial Canola Fields , 2002, Science.

[32]  P. Gouyon,et al.  CORN POLLEN DISPERSAL: QUASI‐MECHANISTIC MODELS AND FIELD EXPERIMENTS , 2003 .

[33]  D. Hemming Gene flow and agriculture: relevance for transgenic crops. , 1999 .

[34]  Janneke HilleRisLambers,et al.  Seed Dispersal Near and Far: Patterns Across Temperate and Tropical Forests , 1999 .

[35]  P. McVetty,et al.  Effectiveness of border areas in confining the spread of transgenic Brassica napus pollen , 2000 .