Performance effects of venture capital firm networks

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the networking effects of venture capital (VC) firms on portfolio companies. VCs can bring specific skills and abilities to their ongoing relationships with their portfolio companies and thus add value by influencing key portfolio company operations. High levels of engagement also translate into giving advice and support, helping with the team culture, creating strategic alliances, or exercising corporate governance. A particular mechanism through which these support services are delivered is syndication investment.Design/methodology/approach – Using network theory tools the paper investigates the effects of syndication on VC firm performance.Findings – The paper finds that networked VC firms are better placed to benefit from their investments.Originality/value – The paper sheds light on the importance of network relationships in the venture capital industry.

[1]  Priscilla Chu.  Social Network Models of Overseas Chinese Entrepreneurship: The Experience in Hong Kong and Canada , 2009 .

[2]  William J. Wilhelm,et al.  Scaling the Hierarchy: How and Why Investment Banks Compete for Syndicate Co-Management Appointments , 2005 .

[3]  Yael V. Hochberg,et al.  Whom You Know Matters: Venture Capital Networks and Investment Performance , 2004 .

[4]  R. Burt.  The Social Structure of Competition , 2004 .

[5]  Joachim Henkel,et al.  What you are is what you like—similarity biases in venture capitalists' evaluations of start-up teams , 2006 .

[6]  Antoinette Schoar,et al.  Private Equity Performance: Returns, Persistence and Capital Flows , 2003 .

[7]  Theo J. B. M. Postma,et al.  Strategy and performance of new ventures: A contingency model of the role and influence of the venture capitalist , 2003 .

[8]  Raphael Amit,et al.  Venture‐Capital Syndication: Improved Venture Selection vs. The Value‐Added Hypothesis , 2002 .

[9]  David Knoke,et al.  How Organizational Field Networks Shape Interorganizational Tie-Formation Rates , 2002 .

[10]  Antoinette Schoar,et al.  Private Equity Returns : Persistence and Capital Flows , 2002 .

[11]  Mike Wright,et al.  The syndication of venture capital investments , 2001 .

[12]  Francesca Cornelli,et al.  Bookbuilding and Strategic Allocation , 1999 .

[13]  Keith G. Provan,et al.  Networks within networks: Service link overlap, organizational cliques, and network effectiveness , 1998 .

[14]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[15]  Royston Greenwood,et al.  VENTURE CAPITALIST RELATIONSHIPS IN THE DEAL STRUCTURING AND POST-INVESTMENT STAGES OF NEW FIRM CREATION , 1995 .

[16]  B. Elango,et al.  How venture capital firms differ , 1995 .

[17]  Kanak Gautam,et al.  The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change , 1994 .

[18]  Edgar Norton,et al.  The Effects of Venture Capitalists' Characteristics on the Structure of the Venture Capital Deal , 1993 .

[19]  Andrea L. Larson.  Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships , 1992 .

[20]  R. Eccles,et al.  Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action , 1992 .

[21]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[22]  W. A. Sahlman,et al.  The structure and governance of venture-capital organizations , 1990 .

[23]  W. A. Sahlman,et al.  What do venture capitalists do , 1989 .

[24]  William D. Bygrave,et al.  The structure of the investment networks of venture capital firms , 1988 .

[25]  J. Johanson,et al.  Interorganizational relations in industrial systems: a network approach compared with the transaction cost approach , 1987 .

[26]  P. Bonacich.  Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[27]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Entrepreneurship Through Social Networks , 1986 .

[28]  S. Birley.  The Role of Networks in the Entrepreneurial Process , 1985 .

[29]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[30]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[31]  N. Shulman.  Network Analysis: A New Addition to an Old Bag of Tricks , 1976 .

[32]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[33]  Robert B. Wilson.  THE THEORY OF SYNDICATES , 1968 .