Time Urgency and the Type A Coronary‐Prone Behavior Pattern1

Two experiments were conducted to examine behavioral consequences of a sense of time urgency, which presumably characterizes individuals classified as manifesting a so-called “Type A” coronary-prone behavior pattern. Experiment I indicated that time-urgent Type A Ss were reliably less successful than noncoronary-prone “Type Bs” in performing a task requiring a low rate of response for reinforcement (DRL). Type As were not only unable to delay their responses; they also showed greater evidence of tension and hyperactivity than Type Bs during DRL performance. Experiment II extended these results to the interpersonal domain. Time-urgent Ss became more impatient and irritated than less urgent Ss when both types were systematically slowed down in their efforts to reach a solution on a joint decision-making task. The results were discussed in terms of a conceptualization of the A-B dimension as reflecting differential expectations of and needs for environmental control. Additional evidence was presented in support of this approach. Consideration was also given to possible physiologic mechanisms mediating the relationship between psychological variables such as the Type A pattern and actual occurrence of coronary heart disease.

[1]  R. Rosenman,et al.  The measurement of pattern A behavior. , 1967, Journal of chronic diseases.

[2]  C. Jenkins,et al.  Coronary heart disease in the Western collaborative group study. A follow-up experience of two years. , 1966, JAMA.

[3]  M. Friedman,et al.  Association of specific overt behavior pattern with blood and cardiovascular findings; blood cholesterol level, blood clotting time, incidence of arcus senilis, and clinical coronary artery disease. , 1959, Journal of the American Medical Association.

[4]  T. H. Holmes,et al.  The Social Readjustment Rating Scale. , 1967, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[5]  A. Moss,et al.  Psychosocial aspects of sudden death. A preliminary report. , 1972, Archives of internal medicine.

[6]  D. Bem,et al.  Group influence on individual risk taking. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[7]  Jenkins Cd,et al.  Psychologic and social precursors of coronary disease (first of two parts). , 1971 .

[8]  D Singh Effect of level of manifest anxiety and type of pretraining on timing behavior. , 1971, The American journal of psychology.

[9]  Melvin L. Snyder,et al.  Helplessness, stress level, and the coronary-prone behavior pattern , 1974 .

[10]  M Frankenhaeuser,et al.  Behavior and circulating catecholamines. , 1971, Brain research.

[11]  C. Jenkins,et al.  Recurring and fatal myocardial infarction in the Western Collaborative Group Study. , 1967, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  R. Rahe,et al.  Behavior and life satisfactions characteristics of Swedish subjects with myocardial infarction. , 1972, Journal of chronic diseases.

[13]  J. Rotter Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[14]  E. E. Jones,et al.  Changes in interpersonal perception as a means of reducing cognitive dissonance. , 1960, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[15]  M. Friedman,et al.  Changes in the Serum Cholesterol and Blood Clotting Time in Men Subjected to Cyclic Variation of Occupational Stress , 1958, Circulation.

[16]  S J Zyzanski,et al.  Basic dimensions within the coronary-prone behavior pattern. , 1970, Journal of chronic diseases.

[17]  S J Zyzanski,et al.  Progress Toward Validation of a Computer‐Scored Test for the Type A Coronary‐Prone Behavior Pattern , 1971, Psychosomatic medicine.

[18]  D. Singh Role of response habits and cognitive factors in determination of behavior of obese humans. , 1973, Journal of personality and social psychology.