A novel approach for left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Intraprocedural integration of coronary venous electroanatomic mapping with delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND Placing the left ventricular (LV) lead at a site of late electrical activation remote from scar is desired to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to integrate coronary venous electroanatomic mapping (EAM) with delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (DE-CMR) enabling LV lead guidance to the latest activated vein remote from scar. METHODS Eighteen CRT candidates with focal scar on DE-CMR were prospectively included. DE-CMR images were semi-automatically analyzed. Coronary venous EAM was performed intraprocedurally and integrated with DE-CMR to guide LV lead placement in real time. Image integration accuracy and electrogram parameters were evaluated offline. RESULTS Integration of EAM and DE-CMR was achieved using 8.9 ± 2.8 anatomic landmarks and with accuracy of 4.7 ± 1.1 mm (mean ± SD). Maximal electrical delay ranged between 72 and 197ms (57%-113% of QRS duration) and was heterogeneously located among individuals. In 12 patients, the latest activated vein was located outside scar, and placing the LV lead in the latest activated vein remote from scar was accomplished in 10 patients and prohibited in 2 patients. In the other 6 patients, the latest activated vein was located in scar, and targeting alternative veins was considered. Unipolar voltages were on average lower in scar compared to nonscar (6.71 ± 3.45 mV vs 8.18 ± 4.02 mV [median ± interquartile range), P <.001) but correlated weakly with DE-CMR scar extent (R -0.161, P <.001) and varied widely among individual patients. CONCLUSION Integration of coronary venous EAM with DE-CMR can be used during CRT implantation to guide LV lead placement to the latest activated vein remote from scar, possibly improving CRT.

[1]  Frits W. Prinzen,et al.  Non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: the magnitude of the problem and the issues. , 2011, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[2]  Reza Razavi,et al.  Cardiac magnetic resonance-derived anatomy, scar, and dyssynchrony fused with fluoroscopy to guide LV lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a comparison with acute haemodynamic measures and echocardiographic reverse remodelling. , 2013, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[3]  Frits W Prinzen,et al.  Influence of left ventricular lead position relative to scar location on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a model study. , 2014, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[4]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. , 2002, Circulation.

[5]  Katja Zeppenfeld,et al.  Head-to-head comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and electroanatomical voltage mapping to assess post-infarct scar characteristics in patients with ventricular tachycardias: real-time image integration and reversed registration. , 2011, European heart journal.

[6]  M. Akhtar,et al.  Three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping of the coronary veins during cardiac resynchronization therapy implant: feasibility and possible applications , 2014, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[7]  David Begley,et al.  Targeted left ventricular lead placement to guide cardiac resynchronization therapy: the TARGET study: a randomized, controlled trial. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  Lluís Mont,et al.  2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). , 2013, European heart journal.

[9]  Marcus Carlsson,et al.  Combined preoperative information using a bullseye plot from speckle tracking echocardiography, cardiac CT scan, and MRI scan: targeted left ventricular lead implantation in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2014, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[10]  Kevin Vernooy,et al.  Left ventricular lead placement in the latest activated region guided by coronary venous electroanatomic mapping. , 2015, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[11]  Angelo Auricchio,et al.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by late gadolinium-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[12]  Jagmeet P. Singh,et al.  QRS morphology, left ventricular lead location, and clinical outcome in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2013, European heart journal.

[13]  Aashish Goela,et al.  Influence of Pacing Site Characteristics on Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[14]  Kenneth A. Ellenbogen,et al.  The relationship between ventricular electrical delay and left ventricular remodelling with cardiac resynchronization therapy , 2011, European heart journal.

[15]  Dan W Rettmann,et al.  Accurate and Objective Infarct Sizing by Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Canine Myocardial Infarction Model , 2022 .