Using 10AFC to further improve the efficiency of the quick CSF method.

The contrast sensitivity function (CSF) provides a fundamental characterization of spatial vision, important for basic and clinical applications, but its long testing times have prevented easy, widespread assessment. The original quick CSF method was developed using a two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) grating orientation identification task (Lesmes, Lu, Baek, & Albright, 2010), and obtained precise CSF assessments while reducing the testing burden to only 50 trials. In this study, we attempt to further improve the efficiency of the quick CSF method by exploiting the properties of psychometric functions in multiple-alternative forced choice (m-AFC) tasks. A simulation study evaluated the effect of the number of alternatives m on the efficiency of the sensitivity measurement by the quick CSF method, and a psychophysical study validated the quick CS method in a 10AFC task. We found that increasing the number of alternatives of the forced-choice task greatly improved the efficiency of CSF assessment in both simulation and psychophysical studies. The quick CSF method based on a 10-letter identification task can assess the CSF with an averaged standard deviation of 0.10 decimal log unit in less than 2 minutes.

[1]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  Enabling high grayscale resolution displays and accurate response time measurements on conventional computers. , 2012, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[2]  W N Charman,et al.  Choice of spatial frequency for contrast sensitivity evaluation after corneal refractive surgery. , 2001, Journal of refractive surgery.

[3]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the contrast sensitivity function: the quick CSF method. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[4]  G B Arden,et al.  A simple grating test for contrast sensitivity: preliminary results indicate value in screening for glaucoma. , 1978, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  B. R. Shelton,et al.  Two-alternative versus three-alternative procedures for threshold estimation , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Pradeep Y. Ramulu,et al.  Precision of contrast sensitivity testing in glaucoma , 2015 .

[7]  Chang-Bing Huang,et al.  qCSF in clinical application: efficient characterization and classification of contrast sensitivity functions in amblyopia. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  Jesse Richman,et al.  Importance of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in patients with glaucoma. , 2010, Archives of ophthalmology.

[9]  Luis A. Lesmes,et al.  Development of pattern vision following early and extended blindness , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  A. Watson,et al.  A standard model for foveal detection of spatial contrast. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[11]  S. Klein,et al.  Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: A commentary , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Linda Lundström,et al.  Quick contrast sensitivity measurements in the periphery. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[13]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  How arousal modulates the visual contrast sensitivity function. , 2014, Emotion.

[14]  M. O'Mahony,et al.  d′ and variance of d′ for four-alternative forced choice (4-AFC). , 2010 .

[15]  D. H. Kelly,et al.  A study of sine-wave contrast sensitivity by two psychophysical methods , 1973 .

[16]  Chang-Bing Huang,et al.  The external noise normalized gain profile of spatial vision. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[17]  Javad Heravian Shandiz,et al.  Contrast Sensitivity versus Visual Evoked Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis , 2010, Journal of ophthalmic & vision research.

[18]  R. F. Hess,et al.  The threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: Evidence for a two type classification , 1977, Vision Research.

[19]  J R Heron,et al.  Variability of visual threshold in multiple sclerosis: effect of background luminance on frequency of seeing. , 1980, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  M. García-Pérez,et al.  The role of parametric assumptions in adaptive Bayesian estimation. , 2004, Psychological methods.

[21]  Kazunori Miyata,et al.  Contrast sensitivity function and ocular higher-order wavefront aberrations in normal human eyes. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[22]  Tuomas J. Lukka,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation: The next dimension , 2006 .

[23]  Peter J. Bex,et al.  The Reliability of the quick CSF Method for Contrast Sensitivity Assessment in Low Vision , 2013 .

[24]  Robert Rosen,et al.  Contrast sensitivity in patients with macular degeneration , 2015 .

[25]  L O Harvey,et al.  Identification confusions among letters of the alphabet. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Sergei Gepshtein,et al.  Sensory adaptation as optimal resource allocation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  G. Legge,et al.  Comparing reading speed for horizontal and vertical English text. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[28]  K. Alexander,et al.  Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[29]  Mark A. Pitt,et al.  A Hierarchical Adaptive Approach to Optimal Experimental Design , 2014, Neural Computation.

[30]  B. Dosher,et al.  External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms , 1998, Vision Research.

[31]  B. Treutwein.  Adaptive psychophysical procedures , 1995, Vision Research.

[32]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Reward breaks through the inhibitory region around attentional focus. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[33]  Arnulf Remole,et al.  VISUAL MASKING: AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH , 1985 .

[34]  B. Dosher,et al.  Characterizing human perceptual inefficiencies with equivalent internal noise. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[35]  V Zemon,et al.  Contrast sensitivity testing: A more complete assessment of vision , 1989, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[36]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. IV. Figures of merit for model performance in multiple-alternative forced-choice detection tasks with correlated responses. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[37]  Robert Montés-Micó,et al.  Contrast sensitivity function in children: normalized notation for the assessment and diagnosis of diseases , 2001, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[38]  Arthur P. Ginsburg,et al.  Contrast Sensitivity and Functional Vision , 2003, International ophthalmology clinics.

[39]  M. M. Taylor.  On the efficiency of psychophysical measurement. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  C A Hazel,et al.  The usefulness of Vistech and FACT contrast sensitivity charts for cataract and refractive surgery outcomes research , 2003, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[41]  Peter G. J. Barten,et al.  Contrast sensitivity of the human eye and its e ects on image quality , 1999 .

[42]  Kenneth R. Alexander,et al.  Contrast sensitivity for letter optotypes vs. gratings under conditions biased toward parvocellular and magnocellular pathways , 2006, Vision Research.

[43]  M. M. Taylor,et al.  PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions , 1967 .

[44]  M F Marmor,et al.  Effect of visual blur on contrast sensitivity. Clinical implications. , 1988, Ophthalmology.

[45]  S. Onal,et al.  FACT contrast sensitivity as a diagnostic tool in glaucoma , 2008, International Ophthalmology.

[46]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your Institution's Administrator. All Other Uses, Reproduction and Distribution, including without Limitation Comm , 2022 .

[47]  C. Tyler,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold , 1999, Vision Research.

[48]  E. Midena,et al.  Macular function impairment in eyes with early age-related macular degeneration. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[49]  Russell L. Woods,et al.  The role of contrast sensitivity charts and contrast letter charts in clinical practice , 1995 .

[50]  S. Onal,et al.  Assessment of spatial–contrast function and short-wavelength sensitivity deficits in patients with migraine , 2007, Eye.

[51]  Michael Dorr,et al.  Visual Psychophysics and Physiological Optics Rapid and Reliable Assessment of the Contrast Sensitivity Function on an iPad , 2013 .

[52]  Leah Blau,et al.  Statistical Models In Epidemiology , 2016 .

[53]  F. Jäkel,et al.  Spatial four-alternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for naïve observers. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[54]  K. May,et al.  Four Theorems on the Psychometric Function , 2013, PloS one.

[55]  Luis A. Lesmes,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of threshold versus contrast external noise functions: The quick TvC method , 2006, Vision Research.

[56]  Yifeng Zhou,et al.  A unified framework and normative dataset for second-order sensitivity using the quick Contrast Sensitivity Function (qCSF) , 2014 .

[57]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  Visual Psychophysics: From Laboratory to Theory , 2013 .

[58]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[59]  Shane T. Mueller,et al.  Alphabetic letter identification: effects of perceivability, similarity, and bias. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[60]  B. Dosher,et al.  Characterizing observers using external noise and observer models: assessing internal representations with external noise. , 2008, Psychological review.

[61]  T E Hanna,et al.  Estimation of psychometric functions from adaptive tracking procedures , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[62]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[63]  Rocío Alcalá Quintana,et al.  The role of parametric assumptions in adaptive Bayesian estimation. , 2004 .

[64]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast detection and near-threshold discrimination in human vision , 1981, Vision Research.

[65]  Luis A. Lesmes,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the sensory memory decay function: the quick Partial Report method , 2014 .

[66]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification in central and peripheral vision , 2002, Vision Research.

[67]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[68]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  Generating high gray-level resolution monochrome displays with conventional computer graphics cards and color monitors , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[69]  M F Marmor,et al.  Contrast sensitivity versus visual acuity in retinal disease. , 1986, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[70]  Marmor Mf.  Contrast sensitivity and retinal disease. , 1981 .

[71]  J. L. Hall,et al.  A procedure for detecting variability of psychophysical thresholds. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[72]  P. King-Smith,et al.  Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: Theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation , 1994, Vision Research.

[73]  M F Marmor,et al.  Contrast sensitivity and retinal disease. , 1981, Annals of ophthalmology.

[74]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A revised table of d’ for M-alternative forced choice , 1979 .

[75]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  Temporal tuning characteristics of the perceptual template and endogenous cuing of spatial attention , 2004, Vision Research.

[76]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[77]  R A Applegate,et al.  Corneal aberrations and visual performance after radial keratotomy. , 1998, Journal of refractive surgery.

[78]  G. Legge,et al.  Contrast discrimination in noise. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[79]  Peter J. Bex,et al.  Clinical Application Of A Novel Contrast Sensitivity Test To A Low Vision Population: The Quick CSF Method , 2012 .