Experimental validation of rigorous, 3D profile models for negative-tone develop resists

The extension of 193nm immersion lithography to the 14nm node and beyond directly encounters a significant reduction in image quality. One of the consequences is that the resist profile varies noticeably, impacting the already limited process window. Resist top-loss, top-rounding, T-top and footing all play significant roles in the subsequent etch process. Therefore, a reliable rigorous model with the capability to correctly predict resist 3D (R3D) profiles is acquiring higher importance. In this paper, we will present a calibrated rigorous model of a negative-tone develop resist. Resist profiles can be well simulated through focus and dose, and cases that match well to the experimental wafer data are validated. Such a model can not only provide early investigation of insights into process limitation and optimization, but can also complement existing OPC models to become R3D-aware in process development.

[1]  Will Conley,et al.  Three-dimensional physical photoresist model calibration and profile-based pattern verification , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[2]  Takeyoshi Ohashi,et al.  Three-dimensional profile extraction from CD-SEM image and top/bottom CD measurement by line-edge roughness analysis , 2013, Advanced Lithography.

[3]  Rolf Seltmann,et al.  Role of 3D photo-resist simulation for advanced technology nodes , 2013, Advanced Lithography.

[4]  Thomas Mülders,et al.  Application of an inverse Mack model for negative tone development simulation , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[5]  Qing Yang,et al.  3D resist profile modeling for OPC applications , 2013, Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Todd C. Bailey,et al.  3D lithography modeling for ground rule development , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[7]  S. Tarutani,et al.  Materials and Processes of Negative Tone Development for Double Patterning Process , 2009 .

[8]  Keita Katou,et al.  Resist material for negative tone development process , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[9]  Shinji Tarutani,et al.  Printing the metal and contact layers for the 32- and 22-nm node: comparing positive and negative tone development process , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Thomas Mülders,et al.  Calibration of physical resist models: methods, usability, and predictive power , 2009 .

[11]  Hiroki Kawada,et al.  Robust edge detection with considering three-dimensional sidewall feature by CD-SEM , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[12]  Will Conley,et al.  3D physical modeling for patterning process development , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[13]  Geert Vandenberghe,et al.  Comparing positive and negative tone development process for printing the metal and contact layers of the 32- and 22-nm nodes , 2010 .

[14]  András E. Vladár,et al.  Can we get 3D-CD metrology right? , 2012, Advanced Lithography.