The use of analogies in language teaching: Representing the content of teachers' practical knowledge

This study sought to determine how experienced language teachers use analogies to help students comprehend a text on the course of their regular teaching routines. It is assumed that analogies constitute one important component of the content of teachers' practical knowledge in the context of reading-comprehension instruction. The framework of the study drew from Shulman's notion of 'pedagogical content knowledge'; the perspective was the analogy-provider (e.g. teacher or textbook author). Eight lessons taught by eight different teachers were observed and analysed for the presence of analogies. The frequent use of analogies, continuously under discussion in the literature about science education, seems at least open to question. The research suggests that teacher education programmes for language teaching should include information about developing and evaluating instructional analogies.

[1]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  The use of analogies in written text , 1984 .

[2]  P. Grossman.  The Making of a Teacher: Teacher Knowledge and Teacher Education , 1990 .

[3]  N. Verloop,et al.  Exploring language teachers' practical knowledge about teaching reading comprehension , 1999 .

[4]  David F. Treagust,et al.  The evolution of an approach for using analogies in teaching and learning science , 1993 .

[5]  K. Denise Muth,et al.  Children's Comprehension of Text: Research into Practice. , 1989 .

[6]  Kim Pittman,et al.  Student-generated analogies: Another way of knowing? , 1999 .

[7]  P. David Pearson,et al.  Moving From the Old to the New: Research on Reading Comprehension Instruction , 1991 .

[8]  P. Grossman,et al.  A Study in Contrast: Sources of Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Secondary English , 1989 .

[9]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Teaching Science Effectively With Analogies: An Approach for Preservice and Inservice Teacher Education , 1998 .

[10]  Z. Dagher.  Analysis of analogies used by science teachers , 1995 .

[11]  L. Shulman.  Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[12]  Gaea Leinhardt,et al.  Wildflowrs, sheep, and democracy: the role of analogy in the teaching and learning of history , 2001 .

[13]  Kathryn F. Cochran,et al.  Pedagogical Content Knowing: An Integrative Model for Teacher Preparation , 1993 .

[14]  Diane F. Halpern,et al.  Analogies as an aid to understanding and memory , 1990 .

[15]  Kathryn Alesandrini,et al.  Generation of Summaries and Analogies and Analytic and Holistic Abilities , 1990 .

[16]  J. Vermunt,et al.  Congruence and friction between learning and teaching , 1999 .

[17]  Ralph T. Putnam,et al.  Learning to teach. , 1996 .

[18]  T. Mastrilli.  Instructional Analogies Used by Biology Teachers: Implications for Practice and Teacher Preparation , 1997 .

[19]  J. Stenton,et al.  Learning how to teach. , 1973, Nursing mirror and midwives journal.

[20]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Science teachers’ use of analogies: observations from classroom practice , 1992 .

[21]  J. Vermunt,et al.  Explicating Practical Knowledge: an extension of mentor teachers’ roles , 1998 .

[22]  R. Duit.  On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. , 1991 .

[23]  Student teachers’ use of analogies in science instruction , 1996 .

[24]  Ruth V. Curtis.  When is a science analogy like a social studies analogy? A comparison of text analogies across two disciplines , 1988 .

[25]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Using an analogical teaching approach to engender conceptual change , 1996 .

[26]  J. Stiehl,et al.  THE GENERIC NATURE OF PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE AMONG COLLEGE PROFESSORS , 1995 .

[27]  Ang Chen,et al.  Content knowledge transformation: An Examination of the relationship between content knowledge and curricula. , 1995 .

[28]  L. Shulman.  Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform , 1987 .