A Markov chain for numerical chromosomal instability in clonally expanding populations

Cancer cells frequently undergo chromosome missegregation events during mitosis, whereby the copies of a given chromosome are not distributed evenly among the two daughter cells, thus creating cells with heterogeneous karyotypes. A stochastic model tracing cellular karyotypes derived from clonal populations over hundreds of generations was recently developed and experimentally validated, and it was capable of predicting favorable karyotypes frequently observed in cancer. Here, we construct and study a Markov chain that precisely describes karyotypic evolution during clonally expanding cancer cell populations. The Markov chain allows us to directly predict the distribution of karyotypes and the expected size of the tumor after many cell divisions without resorting to computationally expensive simulations. We determine the limiting karyotype distribution of an evolving tumor population, and quantify its dependency on several key parameters including the initial karyotype of the founder cell, the rate of whole chromosome missegregation, and chromosome-specific cell viability. Using this model, we confirm the existence of an optimal rate of chromosome missegregation probabilities that maximizes karyotypic heterogeneity, while minimizing the occurrence of nullisomy. Interestingly, karyotypic heterogeneity is significantly more dependent on chromosome missegregation probabilities rather than the number of cell divisions, so that maximal heterogeneity can be reached rapidly (within a few hundred generations of cell division) at chromosome missegregation rates commonly observed in cancer cell lines. Conversely, at low missegregation rates, heterogeneity is constrained even after thousands of cell division events. This leads us to conclude that chromosome copy number heterogeneity is primarily constrained by chromosome missegregation rates and the risk for nullisomy and less so by the age of the tumor. This model enables direct integration of karyotype information into existing models of tumor evolution based on somatic mutations.

[1]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Genetic instability in colorectal cancers , 1997, Nature.

[2]  Alexey Khodjakov,et al.  Merotelic Kinetochore Orientation Is a Major Mechanism of Aneuploidy in Mitotic Mammalian Tissue Cells , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  Zoltan Szallasi,et al.  Tolerance of whole-genome doubling propagates chromosomal instability and accelerates cancer genome evolution. , 2014, Cancer discovery.

[4]  Nicolai J. Birkbak,et al.  Tracking the Evolution of Non‐Small‐Cell Lung Cancer , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Sergi Elizalde,et al.  Dynamics of Tumor Heterogeneity Derived from Clonal Karyotypic Evolution. , 2015, Cell reports.

[6]  Mary E. Edgerton,et al.  Multiclonal Invasion in Breast Tumors Identified by Topographic Single Cell Sequencing , 2018, Cell.

[7]  W. Dooley,et al.  Long-term dynamics of chromosomal instability in cancer: A transition probability model , 2001 .

[8]  Duane A. Compton,et al.  Examining the link between chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in human cells , 2008, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  Darawalee Wangsa,et al.  Chromosome mis-segregation and cytokinesis failure in trisomic human cells , 2015, eLife.

[10]  Z. Storchová,et al.  The consequences of tetraploidy and aneuploidy , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.

[11]  Jan O. Korbel,et al.  Negative Selection and Chromosome Instability Induced by Mad2 Overexpression Delay Breast Cancer but Facilitate Oncogene-Independent Outgrowth , 2016, Cell reports.

[12]  Thomas Ried,et al.  A comprehensive continuous-time model for the appearance of CGH signal due to chromosomal missegregations during mitosis. , 2005, Mathematical biosciences.

[13]  Erik A. van Doorn,et al.  Quasi-stationary distributions for reducible absorbing Markov chains in discrete time , 2008 .

[14]  Samuel F. Bakhoum,et al.  Chromosomal instability drives metastasis through a cytosolic DNA response , 2017, Nature.

[15]  W. Dooley,et al.  A stochastic model of chromosome segregation errors with reference to cancer cells , 2000 .

[16]  A. McKenna,et al.  Absolute quantification of somatic DNA alterations in human cancer , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  Angelika Amon,et al.  Chromosome Mis-segregation Generates Cell-Cycle-Arrested Cells with Complex Karyotypes that Are Eliminated by the Immune System. , 2017, Developmental cell.

[18]  Samuel F. Bakhoum,et al.  Genome stability is ensured by temporal control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[19]  D. Landau,et al.  Chromosomal Instability as a Driver of Tumor Heterogeneity and Evolution. , 2017, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine.

[20]  Angelika Amon,et al.  Single-chromosome Gains Commonly Function as Tumor Suppressors. , 2017, Cancer cell.

[21]  Prabhjot Kaur,et al.  Chromosomal Instability Substantiates Poor Prognosis in Patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[22]  S. Elledge,et al.  Cumulative Haploinsufficiency and Triplosensitivity Drive Aneuploidy Patterns and Shape the Cancer Genome , 2013, Cell.

[23]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Genetic instabilities in human cancers , 1998, Nature.

[24]  Gun Ho Jang,et al.  A renewed model of pancreatic cancer evolution based on genomic rearrangement patterns , 2016, Nature.

[25]  Duane A. Compton,et al.  Proliferation of aneuploid human cells is limited by a p53-dependent mechanism , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.