Robustness and flexibility in nematode vulva development.

The Caenorhabditis elegans vulva has served as a paradigm for how conserved developmental pathways, such as EGF-Ras-MAPK, Notch and Wnt signaling, participate in networks driving animal organogenesis. Here, we discuss an emerging direction in the field, which places vulva research in a quantitative and microevolutionary framework. The final vulval cell fate pattern is known to be robust to change, but only recently has the variation of vulval traits been measured under stochastic, environmental or genetic variation. Whereas the resulting cell fate pattern is invariant among rhabditid nematodes, recent studies indicate that the developmental system has accumulated cryptic variation, even among wild C. elegans isolates. Quantitative differences in the signaling network have emerged through experiments and modeling as the driving force behind cryptic variation in Caenorhabditis species. On a wider evolutionary scale, the establishment of new model species has informed about the presence of qualitative variation in vulval signaling pathways.

[1]  J. Sulston,et al.  Post-embryonic cell lineages of the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1977, Developmental biology.

[2]  W. Blanckenhorn,et al.  HIGH TEMPERATURES REVEAL CRYPTIC GENETIC VARIATION IN A POLYMORPHIC FEMALE SPERM STORAGE ORGAN , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  M. Lynch The evolution of genetic networks by non-adaptive processes , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[4]  A. Stetak,et al.  Cell fate‐specific regulation of EGF receptor trafficking during Caenorhabditis elegans vulval development , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[5]  A. Wagner,et al.  Robustness and evolution: concepts, insights and challenges from a developmental model system , 2008, Heredity.

[6]  Henri E. Bal,et al.  Executing multicellular differentiation: quantitative predictive modelling of C.elegans vulval development , 2009, Bioinform..

[7]  Paul W. Sternberg,et al.  Predicting Phenotypic Diversity and the Underlying Quantitative Molecular Transitions , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[8]  Edwin Munro,et al.  Quantitative Variation in Autocrine Signaling and Pathway Crosstalk in the Caenorhabditis Vulval Network , 2011, Current Biology.

[9]  A. Wagner Robustness and Evolvability in Living Systems , 2005 .

[10]  Greg Gibson,et al.  Uncovering cryptic genetic variation , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[11]  Thomas R Clandinin,et al.  Different Levels of the C. elegans growth factor LIN-3 promote distinct vulval precursor fates , 1995, Cell.

[12]  R. Sommer,et al.  Novel cell-cell interactions during vulva development in Pristionchus pacificus. , 2000, Development.

[13]  M. Félix,et al.  Phenotypic neighborhood and micro-evolvability. , 2004, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[14]  P. Sternberg,et al.  Signal Transduction during Caenorhabditis elegans Vulval Determination , 1993 .

[15]  Paul W. Sternberg,et al.  Multiple intercellular signalling systems control the development of the Caenorhabditis elegans vulva , 1991, Nature.

[16]  R. Sommer,et al.  Wnt Signaling Induces Vulva Development in the Nematode Pristionchus pacificus , 2008, Current Biology.

[17]  Stuart K. Kim,et al.  The beta-catenin homolog BAR-1 and LET-60 Ras coordinately regulate the Hox gene lin-39 during Caenorhabditis elegans vulval development. , 1998, Development.

[18]  M. Félix,et al.  High sensitivity of C. elegans vulval precursor cells to the dose of posterior Wnts. , 2011, Developmental biology.

[19]  I. Greenwald,et al.  Spatial Regulation of lag-2 Transcription During Vulval Precursor Cell Fate Patterning in Caenorhabditis eleganslag-2 , 2011, Genetics.

[20]  M. Lynch,et al.  Comparative evolutionary genetics of spontaneous mutations affecting fitness in rhabditid nematodes. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Paul W. Sternberg,et al.  The combined action of two intercellular signaling pathways specifies three cell fates during vulval induction in C. elegans , 1989, Cell.

[22]  R. Sommer,et al.  Antagonism of LIN-17/Frizzled and LIN-18/Ryk in Nematode Vulva Induction Reveals Evolutionary Alterations in Core Developmental Pathways , 2011, PLoS biology.

[23]  R. Sommer,et al.  Changes of induction and competence during the evolution of vulva development in nematodes. , 1994, Science.

[24]  R. Sommer Evolution of development in nematodes related to C. elegans. , 2005, WormBook : the online review of C. elegans biology.

[25]  J. Doebley,et al.  Genetic variation for phenotypically invariant traits detected in teosinte: implications for the evolution of novel forms. , 2002, Genetics.

[26]  Alexander van Oudenaarden,et al.  Neuroblast migration along the anteroposterior axis of C. elegans is controlled by opposing gradients of Wnts and a secreted Frizzled-related protein , 2011, Development.

[27]  Ning Chen,et al.  The lateral signal for LIN-12/Notch in C. elegans vulval development comprises redundant secreted and transmembrane DSL proteins. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[28]  P. Sternberg,et al.  Control of vulval cell division number in the nematode Oscheius/Dolichorhabditis sp. CEW1. , 2001, Genetics.

[29]  J Kimble,et al.  Alterations in cell lineage following laser ablation of cells in the somatic gonad of Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1981, Developmental biology.

[30]  M. Félix,et al.  Role of Pleiotropy in the Evolution of a Cryptic Developmental Variation in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2012, PLoS biology.

[31]  W. Cresko,et al.  CRYPTIC GENETIC VARIATION AND BODY SIZE EVOLUTION IN THREESPINE STICKLEBACK , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  P. Sternberg,et al.  unc-101, a gene required for many aspects of Caenorhabditis elegans development and behavior, encodes a clathrin-associated protein. , 1994, Genes & Development.

[33]  Paul W Sternberg,et al.  Intercellular coupling amplifies fate segregation during Caenorhabditis elegans vulval development , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Christian Braendle,et al.  Plasticity and errors of a robust developmental system in different environments. , 2008, Developmental cell.

[35]  Greg Gibson,et al.  Decanalization and the origin of complex disease , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[36]  M. Siegal,et al.  Robustness: mechanisms and consequences. , 2009, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[37]  G. Gibson,et al.  Evidence that Egfr Contributes to Cryptic Genetic Variation for Photoreceptor Determination in Natural Populations of Drosophila melanogaster , 2003, Current Biology.

[38]  H. Korswagen,et al.  Activation of Wnt signaling bypasses the requirement for RTK/Ras signaling during C. elegans vulval induction. , 2002, Genes & development.

[39]  P. Sternberg,et al.  Two nested gonadal inductions of the vulva in nematodes. , 1997, Development.

[40]  R. Sommer,et al.  Evolution of vulva development in the Cephalobina (Nematoda). , 2000, Developmental biology.

[41]  Karin Kiontke,et al.  Trends, Stasis, and Drift in the Evolution of Nematode Vulva Development , 2007, Current Biology.

[42]  Amir Pnueli,et al.  A scenario-based approach to modeling development: a prototype model of C. elegans vulval fate specification. , 2008, Developmental biology.

[43]  Masao Nagasaki,et al.  Simulation-based model checking approach to cell fate specification during Caenorhabditis elegans vulval development by hybrid functional Petri net with extension , 2009, BMC Systems Biology.

[44]  S. K. Kim,et al.  Signal transduction and cell fate specification during Caenorhabditis elegans vulval development. , 1994, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[45]  Min Han,et al.  SynMuv genes redundantly inhibit lin-3/EGF expression to prevent inappropriate vulval induction in C. elegans. , 2006, Developmental cell.

[46]  David Harel,et al.  Computational insights into Caenorhabditis elegans vulval development. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  B. Gupta,et al.  Evolution of Developmental Control Mechanism Conserved mechanism of Wnt signaling function in the specification of vulval precursor fates in C. elegans and C. briggsae , 2010 .

[48]  M. Félix,et al.  Intraspecific evolution of the intercellular signaling network underlying a robust developmental system. , 2008, Genes & development.

[49]  Carola B. Sigrist,et al.  Vulva formation in Pristionchus pacificus relies on continuous gonadal induction , 1999, Development Genes and Evolution.

[50]  P. Sternberg,et al.  Caenorhabditis elegans HOM-C genes regulate the response of vulval precursor cells to inductive signal. , 1997, Developmental biology.

[51]  M. Félix,et al.  The two steps of vulval induction in Oscheius tipulae CEW1 recruit common regulators including a MEK kinase. , 2004, Developmental biology.

[52]  H. Horvitz,et al.  Postembryonic nongonadal cell lineages of the nematode Panagrellus redivivus: description and comparison with those of Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1982, Developmental biology.

[53]  Xiaoyun Sun,et al.  Computational modeling of Caenorhabditis elegans vulval induction , 2007, ISMB/ECCB.

[54]  G. Gibson,et al.  Genomic Consequences of Background Effects on scalloped Mutant Expressivity in the Wing of Drosophila melanogaster , 2009, Genetics.

[55]  R. Sommer,et al.  Conservation and diversification of Wnt signaling function during the evolution of nematode vulva development , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[56]  M. Sundaram,et al.  The love-hate relationship between Ras and Notch. , 2005, Genes & development.

[57]  Marie-Anne Félix,et al.  Cryptic Quantitative Evolution of the Vulva Intercellular Signaling Network in Caenorhabditis , 2007, Current Biology.

[58]  Channing J Der,et al.  Ras effector switching promotes divergent cell fates in C. elegans vulval patterning. , 2011, Developmental cell.

[59]  M. Félix,et al.  Polymorphism and evolution of vulval precursor cell lineages within two nematode genera, Caenorhabditis and Oscheius , 2001, Current Biology.

[60]  Thomas A. Henzinger,et al.  Predictive Modeling of Signaling Crosstalk during C. elegans Vulval Development , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[61]  E. Szyleyko,et al.  Multiple redundant Wnt signaling components function in two processes during C. elegans vulval development. , 2006, Developmental biology.

[62]  R. Sommer,et al.  HAIRY-like Transcription Factors and the Evolution of the Nematode Vulva Equivalence Group , 2006, Current Biology.

[63]  C. Kenyon,et al.  The role of lin-22, a hairy/enhancer of split homolog, in patterning the peripheral nervous system of C. elegans. , 1997, Development.

[64]  J. Massagué TGF-beta signal transduction. , 1998, Annual review of biochemistry.

[65]  Paul W. Sternberg,et al.  Pattern formation during vulval development in C. elegans , 1986, Cell.

[66]  A. Stoltzfus,et al.  Bias in the introduction of variation as an orienting factor in evolution , 2001, Evolution & development.

[67]  R. Sommer,et al.  Distinct patterns of genetic variation in Pristionchus pacificus and Caenorhabditis elegans, two partially selfing nematodes with cosmopolitan distribution , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[68]  M. Félix,et al.  Evolution of a system sensitive to stochastic noise: P3.p cell fate in Caenorhabditis. , 2011, Developmental biology.

[69]  Iva Greenwald,et al.  Wnt signal from multiple tissues and lin-3/EGF signal from the gonad maintain vulval precursor cell competence in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[70]  M. Félix,et al.  Bias and Evolution of the Mutationally Accessible Phenotypic Space in a Developmental System , 2010, PLoS genetics.