Melting curves of ice polymorphs in the vicinity of the liquid-liquid critical point.

The possible existence of a liquid-liquid critical point in deeply supercooled water has been a subject of debate in part due to the challenges associated with providing definitive experimental evidence. Pioneering work by Mishima and Stanley [Nature 392, 164 (1998) and Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 334 (2000)] sought to shed light on this problem by studying the melting curves of different ice polymorphs and their metastable continuation in the vicinity of the expected location of the liquid-liquid transition and its associated critical point. Based on the continuous or discontinuous changes in slope of the melting curves, Mishima suggested that the liquid-liquid critical point lies between the melting curves of ice III and ice V. Here, we explore this conjecture using molecular dynamics simulations with a purely-predictive machine learning model based on ab initio quantum-mechanical calculations. We study the melting curves of ices III, IV, V, VI, and XIII using this model and find that the melting lines of all the studied ice polymorphs are supercritical and do not intersect the liquid-liquid transition locus. We also find a pronounced, yet continuous, change in slope of the melting lines upon crossing of the locus of maximum compressibility of the liquid. Finally, we analyze critically the literature in light of our findings, and conclude that the scenario in which melting curves are supercritical is favored by the most recent computational and experimental evidence. Thus, although the preponderance of experimental and computational evidence is consistent with the existence of a second critical point in water, the behavior of the melting lines of ice polymorphs does not provide strong evidence in support of this viewpoint, according to our calculations.

[1]  O. Mishima,et al.  Equation of State of Liquid Water Written by Simple Experimental Polynomials and the Liquid-Liquid Critical Point. , 2023, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[2]  P. Debenedetti,et al.  Liquid-Liquid Transition in Water from First Principles. , 2022, Physical review letters.

[3]  P. Piaggi,et al.  Phase diagram of the TIP4P/Ice water model by enhanced sampling simulations. , 2022, The Journal of chemical physics.

[4]  P. Debenedetti,et al.  Liquid-liquid criticality in the WAIL water model. , 2022, The Journal of chemical physics.

[5]  A. Nilsson Origin of the anomalous properties in supercooled water based on experimental probing inside “no-man's land” , 2022, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids: X.

[6]  P. Debenedetti,et al.  Homogeneous ice nucleation in an ab initio machine-learning model of water , 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  W. E,et al.  Deep Potentials for Materials Science , 2022, Materials Futures.

[8]  Steven J. Plimpton,et al.  LAMMPS - A flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales , 2021, Computer Physics Communications.

[9]  T. Loerting,et al.  Experimental evidence for glass polymorphism in vitrified water droplets , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  A. Michaelides,et al.  Machine learning potentials for complex aqueous systems made simple , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  T. Hansen The everlasting hunt for new ice phases , 2021, Nature Communications.

[12]  A. Fortes,et al.  Structural characterization of ice XIX as the second polymorph related to ice VI , 2021, Nature communications.

[13]  W. E,et al.  Phase Diagram of a Deep Potential Water Model. , 2021, Physical review letters.

[14]  P. Debenedetti,et al.  Phase Equilibrium of Water with Hexagonal and Cubic Ice Using the SCAN Functional. , 2021, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[15]  Bingqing Cheng,et al.  Quantum-mechanical exploration of the phase diagram of water , 2020, Nature Communications.

[16]  A. Nilsson,et al.  Experimental observation of the liquid-liquid transition in bulk supercooled water under pressure , 2020, Science.

[17]  Hajime Tanaka,et al.  The anomalies and criticality of liquid water , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  P. Debenedetti,et al.  Signatures of a liquid–liquid transition in an ab initio deep neural network model for water , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  P. Debenedetti,et al.  Second critical point in two realistic models of water , 2020, Science.

[20]  Michele Parrinello,et al.  Unified Approach to Enhanced Sampling , 2020, 2007.03055.

[21]  J. Perdew,et al.  Self-interaction error overbinds water clusters but cancels in structural energy differences , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Frank Noé,et al.  Machine learning for molecular simulation , 2019, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[23]  Jakub Rydzewski,et al.  Promoting transparency and reproducibility in enhanced molecular simulations , 2019, Nature Methods.

[24]  P. Piaggi,et al.  Calculation of phase diagrams in the multithermal-multibaric ensemble. , 2019, The Journal of chemical physics.

[25]  C. Salzmann Advances in the experimental exploration of water's phase diagram. , 2018, The Journal of chemical physics.

[26]  Michele Parrinello,et al.  Multithermal-Multibaric Molecular Simulations from a Variational Principle. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[27]  A. Pfeifer,et al.  Electronic Supplementary Material , 2019, The Development Dimension.

[28]  P. Debenedetti,et al.  Advances in Computational Studies of the Liquid-Liquid Transition in Water and Water-Like Models. , 2018, Chemical reviews.

[29]  E Weinan,et al.  End-to-end Symmetry Preserving Inter-atomic Potential Energy Model for Finite and Extended Systems , 2018, NeurIPS.

[30]  E Weinan,et al.  DeePMD-kit: A deep learning package for many-body potential energy representation and molecular dynamics , 2017, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[31]  Hideki Tanaka,et al.  GenIce: Hydrogen‐Disordered Ice Generator , 2017, J. Comput. Chem..

[32]  E Weinan,et al.  Deep Potential Molecular Dynamics: a scalable model with the accuracy of quantum mechanics , 2017, Physical review letters.

[33]  F. Sciortino,et al.  Supercooled and glassy water: Metastable liquid(s), amorphous solid(s), and a no-man’s land , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  M. Klein,et al.  Ab initio theory and modeling of water , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Jianwei Sun,et al.  Accurate first-principles structures and energies of diversely bonded systems from an efficient density functional. , 2016, Nature chemistry.

[36]  H. Stanley,et al.  Water: A Tale of Two Liquids , 2016, Chemical reviews.

[37]  S. Schmidt,et al.  Robust structural identification via polyhedral template matching , 2016, 1603.05143.

[38]  Andrew H. Nguyen,et al.  Identification of Clathrate Hydrates, Hexagonal Ice, Cubic Ice, and Liquid Water in Simulations: the CHILL+ Algorithm. , 2015, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[39]  Adrienn Ruzsinszky,et al.  Strongly Constrained and Appropriately Normed Semilocal Density Functional. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[40]  P. Debenedetti,et al.  Metastable liquid–liquid transition in a molecular model of water , 2014, Nature.

[41]  Massimiliano Bonomi,et al.  PLUMED 2: New feathers for an old bird , 2013, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[42]  Ulf R. Pedersen,et al.  Computing Gibbs free energy differences by interface pinning , 2013, 1302.5263.

[43]  J. Finney,et al.  How many amorphous ices are there? , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[44]  A. Stukowski Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the Open Visualization Tool , 2009 .

[45]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[46]  H. Stanley,et al.  Relation between the Widom line and the dynamic crossover in systems with a liquid-liquid phase transition. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  C. Vega,et al.  A potential model for the study of ices and amorphous water: TIP4P/Ice. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[48]  Pablo G. Debenedetti,et al.  Supercooled and glassy water , 2003 .

[49]  Mishima,et al.  Liquid-liquid critical point in heavy water , 2000, Physical review letters.

[50]  H. Eugene Stanley,et al.  Decompression-induced melting of ice IV and the liquid–liquid transition in water , 1998, Nature.

[51]  Steve Plimpton,et al.  Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics , 1993 .

[52]  David A. Kofke,et al.  Gibbs-Duhem integration: a new method for direct evaluation of phase coexistence by molecular simulation , 1993 .

[53]  H. Eugene Stanley,et al.  Phase behaviour of metastable water , 1992, Nature.

[54]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method , 1981 .

[55]  H. Callen Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics , 1988 .