A practical guide to effective behavior change : How to identify what to change in the first place

ehps.net/ehp In 1947, mathematician John von Neuman remarked that mathematics is simple, supporting this claim with a comparison with something infinitely more complicated: "If people do not believe that mathematics is simple, it is only because they do not realize how complicated life is" (Alt, 1972). Behavior change scientists who study behavior change or who develop behavior change interventions operate in between these two extremes of overwhelming complexity and, well, at least relative simplicity. Effective behavior change methods (Peters, de Bruin, & Crutzen, 2014) employ theorybased1 processes of change to influence psychological variables that are postulated to determine behavior. Because, bar physical coercion, no behavior change method operates directly on behavior, this means that identifying the relevant determinants and beliefs to influence is a crucial step in the development, or evaluation, of any behavior change method/technique. The current contribution intends to pave the way for more in-depth discussion of behavior change by outlining basic guidelines for establishing which determinants, and, maybe even more importantly, which beliefs, to influence. This document has been set up to be useful when explaining the basics of behavior change to, for example, students, early-career Ph.D. candidates, or practitioners. Therefore, it will start with outlining, assuming very little knowledge of psychology, why it is imperative to map beliefs and determinants before even thinking about how to change a given behavior. In the second part, practical pointers will be given as to how to actually do this – map beliefs and determinants. In other words, first I’ll explain what to change; and then, how to identify what to change.

[1]  G. Antes,et al.  Five Steps to Conducting a Systematic Review , 2003, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[2]  P. Gollwitzer Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. , 1999 .

[3]  G. Kok,et al.  The development of an adolescent smoking cessation intervention—an Intervention Mapping approach to planning , 2011, Health education research.

[4]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement , 2009, BMJ.

[5]  C. Abraham,et al.  Full Disclosure: Doing behavioural science necessitates sharing , 2015 .

[6]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour: A manual for health services researchers , 2004 .

[7]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  Standard care quality determines treatment outcomes in control groups of HAART-adherence intervention studies: implications for the interpretation and comparison of intervention effects. , 2009, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[8]  Ralf Schwarzer,et al.  Modelando el cambio en el comportamiento de salud: Cómo predecir y modificar la adopción y el mantenimiento de comportamientos de salud/Modeling Health Behavior Change: How to Predict and Modify the Adoption and Maintenance of Health Behaviors , 2009 .

[9]  A. Luszczynska,et al.  Planning interventions for behaviour change: A protocol for establishing best practice through consensus , 2014 .

[10]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  The Ecological Approach in Health Promotion Programs: A Decade Later , 2008, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[11]  K. McDermott,et al.  Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. , 1995 .

[12]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach , 2009 .

[13]  G. Kok A practical guide to effective behavior change: How to apply theory- and evidence-based behavior change methods in an intervention , 2014 .

[14]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  Condom use in steady and casual sexual relationships: Planning, preparation and willingness to take risks among adolescents , 2006, Psychology & health.

[15]  A. Bandura Social cognitive theory of self-regulation☆ , 1991 .

[16]  Gjalt-Jorn Peters,et al.  The alpha and the omega of scale reliability and validity: Why and how to abandon Cronbach’s alpha and the route towards more comprehensive assessment of scale quality , 2014 .

[17]  J. Gutmann Qualitative research practice: : a guide for social science students and researchers (2nd edn). , 2014 .

[18]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  Decoding health education interventions: The times are a-changin’ , 2009 .

[19]  Benjamin Schüz,et al.  Action planning and coping planning for long-term lifestyle change: Theory and assessment , 2005 .

[20]  Rik Crutzen,et al.  UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Everything should be as simple as possible, but no simpler: towards a protocol for accumulating evidence regarding the active content of health behaviour change interventions , 2015 .

[21]  Franz L. Alt,et al.  Archaelogy of computers: reminiscences, 1945-1947 , 1972, CACM.

[22]  Maria E. Fernandez,et al.  Planning Health Promotion Programs: An Intervention Mapping Approach , 2006 .

[23]  Frederico A. C. Azevedo,et al.  Equal numbers of neuronal and nonneuronal cells make the human brain an isometrically scaled‐up primate brain , 2009, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[24]  G. Kok,et al.  A structured review of reasons for ecstasy use and related behaviours: pointers for future research , 2009, BMC public health.

[25]  C. Abraham,et al.  Social cognitive determinants of ecstasy use to target in evidence-based interventions: a meta-analytical review , 2008, Addiction.

[26]  G. Kok,et al.  Queermasters: Developing a Theory‐ and Evidence‐Based Internet HIV‐Prevention Intervention to Promote HIV‐Testing among Men who have Sex with Men (MSM) , 2008 .