The scientific status of metazoan cladistics: why current research practice must change

Jenner, R. A. (2004). The scientific status of metazoan cladistics: why current research practice must change. —Zoologica Scripta, 33, 293–310.

[1]  A D Chisholm,et al.  Cell Lineage , 1898, The American Naturalist.

[2]  A. H. Clark,et al.  Animal evolution , 1981 .

[3]  L. Hyman.  Invertebrate Zoology. (Book Reviews: The Invertebrates: Platyhelminthes and Rhynchocoela. The Acoelomate Bilateria) , 1951 .

[4]  P. Hofstaetter.  [Similarity]. , 2020, Psyche.

[5]  Arnold G. Kluge,et al.  A Numerical Approach to Phylogenetic Systematics , 1970 .

[6]  S. Gould,et al.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[7]  S. Morris,et al.  THE ORIGINS AND EVOLUTION OF THE ACANTHOCEPHALA , 1982 .

[8]  M. Midgley.  Sociobiology. , 1984, Journal of medical ethics.

[9]  The Nephridium of the Bonellia viridis Male (Echiura) , 1990 .

[10]  R. Lewontin,et al.  Twenty-five years ago in Genetics: electrophoresis in the development of evolutionary genetics: milestone or millstone? , 1991, Genetics.

[11]  D. Eernisse,et al.  Annelida and Arthropoda are Not Sister Taxa: A Phylogenetic Analysis of Spiralian Metazoan Morphology , 1992 .

[12]  C. Nielsen.  Larval and Adult Characters in Animal Phytogeny , 1994 .

[13]  Michael S. Y. Lee.  Historical Burden In Systematics And The Interrelationships Of ‘Parareptiles’ , 1995 .

[14]  F. Schram.  Animal evolution: Interrelationships of living Phyla , 1995 .

[15]  Peter J. Bowler,et al.  Life's splendid drama , 1996 .

[16]  L. Salvini-Plawen.  Synapomorphies and synplesiomorphies in higher classification of Mollusca , 1996 .

[17]  A. Crossman.  Biology Takes Form. Animal Morphology and the German Universities, 1800-1900 , 1996 .

[18]  N. Scharff,et al.  CLADISTIC ANALYSES OF THE ANIMAL KINGDOM , 1996 .

[19]  The chordoid larva of Symbion pandora (Cycliophora) is a modified trochophore , 1996, Journal of morphology.

[20]  C. Ricci,et al.  A Cladistic Analysis of Pseudocoelomate (Aschelminth) Morphology , 1996 .

[21]  P. Medawar,et al.  The strange case of the spotted mice and other classic essays on science , 1996 .

[22]  R. A. Dewel,et al.  The brain of Echiniscus viridissimus Peterfi, 1956 (Heterotardigrada): a key to understanding the phylogenetic position of tardigrades and the evolution of the arthropod head , 1996 .

[23]  A. Kluge,et al.  Testability and the Refutation and Corroboration of Cladistic Hypotheses , 1997, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[24]  David Oldroyd,et al.  Life's splendid drama: evolutionary biology and the reconstruction of life's ancestry, 1860–1940 , 1997, Medical History.

[25]  Michael S. Y. Lee.  The phylogeny of varanoid lizards and the affinities of snakes , 1997 .

[26]  J. Hawkins,et al.  Primary Homology Assessment, Characters and Character States , 1997, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[27]  G. Rouse,et al.  Cladistics and polychaetes , 1997 .

[28]  A. Kluge.  Sophisticated falsification and research cycles: Consequences for differential character weighting in phylogenetic systematics , 1997 .

[29]  Bergström Jan.  1. Origin of high-rank groups of organisms , 1997 .

[30]  Michael S. Y. Lee,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EVOLUTIONARY THEORY AND PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS , 1997, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[31]  M. Siddall,et al.  Probabilism and Phylogenetic Inference , 1997, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[32]  A. Bezděk,et al.  Phylogeny of the Metazoa Based on Morphological and 18S Ribosomal DNA Evidence , 1998, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[33]  T. Cavalier-smith,et al.  A revised six‐kingdom system of life , 1998, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[34]  Michael S. Y. Lee.  Convergent evolution and character correlation in burrowing reptiles: towards a resolution of squamate relationships , 1998 .

[35]  G. Budd,et al.  The organization of the subesophageal nervous system in tardigrades: Insights into the evolution of the arthropod hypostome and tritocerebrum , 1999 .

[36]  Ellen E. Strong,et al.  Character Coding and Inapplicable Data , 1999 .

[37]  O. Rieppel,et al.  THE ORIGIN AND EARLY EVOLUTION OF TURTLES , 1999 .

[38]  Trochophore concepts: ciliary bands and the evolution of larvae in spiralian Metazoa , 1999 .

[39]  R. Jenner,et al.  The grand game of metazoan phylogeny: rules and strategies , 1999 .

[40]  E. Willerslev,et al.  On the phylogeny of the Metazoa in the light of Cycliophora and Micrognathozoa. , 2000 .

[41]  G. Budd,et al.  Onychophoran cephalic nerves and their bearing on our understanding of head segmentation and stem-group evolution of Arthropoda. , 2000, Arthropod structure & development.

[42]  Julie A. Hawkins,et al.  A survey of primary homology assessment: different botanists perceive and define characters in different ways , 2000 .

[43]  P. Funch,et al.  Micrognathozoa: A new class with complicated jaws like those of Rotifera and Gnathostomulida , 2000, Journal of morphology.

[44]  R. Jenner.  Evolution of animal body plans: the role of metazoan phylogeny at the interface between pattern and process , 2000, Evolution & development.

[45]  G. Rouse.  The epitome of hand waving? Larval feeding and hypotheses of metazoan phylogeny , 2000, Evolution & development.

[46]  W. Wheeler,et al.  Triploblastic relationships with emphasis on the acoelomates and the position of Gnathostomulida, Cycliophora, Plathelminthes, and Chaetognatha: a combined approach of 18S rDNA sequences and morphology. , 2000, Systematic biology.

[47]  G. Purschke,et al.  The phylogenetic position of the Clitellata and the Echiura - on the problematic assessment of absent characters* , 2000 .

[48]  M. Martindale,et al.  The unique developmental program of the acoel flatworm, Neochildia fusca. , 2000, Developmental biology.

[49]  B. Dayrat,et al.  Taxon sampling, character sampling and systematics: how gradist presuppositions created additional ganglia in gastropod euthyneuran taxa , 2000 .

[50]  W. Westheide,et al.  Structure of the nervous system of Myzostoma cirriferum (Annelida) as revealed by immunohistochemistry and cLSM analyses , 2000, Journal of morphology.

[51]  P. Forey,et al.  Conodont affinity and chordate phylogeny , 2000, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[52]  G. Haszprunar.  Is the Aplacophora Monophyletic? a Cladistic Point of View , 2000 .

[53]  G. Rouse.  Bias? What bias? The evolution of downstream larval‐feeding in animals , 2000 .

[54]  Évin,et al.  Symposium: Reconstructing Ancestral Character States The Assumptions and Challenges of Ancestral State Reconstructions , 2000 .

[55]  J F Allen,et al.  Bioinformatics and discovery: induction beckons again , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[56]  J. Zrzavý.  The interrelationships of metazoan parasites: a review of phylum-and higher-level hypotheses from recent morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses. , 2001, Folia parasitologica.

[57]  R. Jenner.  Bilaterian phylogeny and uncritical recycling of morphological data sets. , 2001, Systematic biology.

[58]  V. Hypša,et al.  Myzostomida Are Not Annelids: Molecular and Morphological Support for a Clade of Animals with Anterior Sperm Flagella , 2001, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[59]  K. Peterson,et al.  Animal phylogeny and the ancestry of bilaterians: inferences from morphology and 18S rDNA gene sequences , 2001, Evolution & development.

[60]  Lamellisabellidae,et al.  A cladistic analysis of Siboglinidae Caullery , 1914 ( Polychaeta , Annelida ) : formerly the phyla Pogonophora and Vestimentifera , 2001 .

[61]  M. Martindale,et al.  The origin of mesoderm in phoronids. , 2002, Developmental biology.

[62]  N. Patel,et al.  Cell lineage analysis of the amphipod crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis reveals an early restriction of cell fates , 2002, Development.

[63]  I. Ruiz-Trillo,et al.  A phylogenetic analysis of myosin heavy chain type II sequences corroborates that Acoela and Nemertodermatida are basal bilaterians , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[64]  W. Westheide,et al.  Are Echiura derived from a segmented ancestor? Immunohistochemical analysis of the nervous system in developmental stages of Bonellia viridis , 2002, Journal of morphology.

[65]  Gonzalo Giribet,et al.  Current advances in the phylogenetic reconstruction of metazoan evolution. A new paradigm for the Cambrian explosion? , 2002, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[66]  I. Ruiz-Trillo,et al.  The Nemertodermatida are basal bilaterians and not members of the Platyhelminthes , 2002 .

[67]  R. Lewontin.  Directions in evolutionary biology. , 2002, Annual review of genetics.

[68]  A. Wanninger,et al.  Neurogenesis in the mossy chiton, Mopalia muscosa (gould) (polyplacophora): Evidence against molluscan metamerism , 2002, Journal of morphology.

[69]  L. Nyhart.  Learning from history: Morphology's challenges in Germany ca. 1900 , 2002, Journal of morphology.

[70]  C. Nielsen.  The Phylogenetic Position of Entoprocta, Ectoprocta, Phoronida, and Brachiopoda1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[71]  J. M. Turbeville.  Progress in Nemertean Biology: Development and Phylogeny1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[72]  A. Wanninger,et al.  Chiton myogenesis: Perspectives for the development and evolution of larval and adult muscle systems in molluscs , 2002, Journal of morphology.

[73]  R. Hessling.  Metameric organisation of the nervous system in developmental stages of Urechis caupo (Echiura) and its phylogenetic implications , 2002, Zoomorphology.

[74]  R. Jenner.  Boolean logic and character state indentity: pitfalls of character coding in metazoan cladistics , 2002 .

[75]  M. Obst,et al.  Dwarf male of symbion pandora (cycliophora) , 2003, Journal of morphology.

[76]  J. Zrzavý.  Gastrotricha and metazoan phylogeny , 2003 .

[77]  R. Jenner.  Unleashing the Force of Cladistics? Metazoan Phylogenetics and Hypothesis Testing1 , 2003, Integrative and comparative biology.

[78]  J. Farris.  The Logical Basis of Phylogenetic Analysis , 2004 .

[79]  R. Jenner.  Towards a phylogeny of the Metazoa: evaluating alternative phylogenetic positions of Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, and Gnathostomulida, with a critical reappraisal of cladistic characters , 2004 .

[80]  C. Lemburg,et al.  Ultrastructure of the introvert and associated structures of the larvae of Halicryptus spinulosus (Priapulida) , 1995, Zoomorphology.

[81]  R. Rieger.  A new group of interstitial worms, Lobatocerebridae nov. fam. (Annelida) and its significance for metazoan phylogeny , 1980, Zoomorphologie.

[82]  The nervous system ofNectonema munidae andGordius aquaticus, with implications for the ground pattern of the Nematomorpha , 1996, Zoomorphology.

[83]  C. R,et al.  Twenty-Five Years Ago in GENETICS : Electrophoresis in the Development of Evolutionary Genetics : Milestone or Millstone ? , 2022 .

[84]  Rotifera , eLS.