Air pollution policies in Europe: efficiency gains from integrating climate effects with damage costs to health and crops.

Emissions of air pollutants cause damage to health and crops, but several air pollutants also have an effect on climate through radiative forcing. We investigate efficiency gains achieved by integrating climate impacts of air pollutants into air quality strategies for the EU region. The pollutants included in this study are SO2 ,N H3, VOC, CO, NOx, black carbon, organic carbon, PM2.5, and CH4. We illustrate the relative importance of climate change effects compared to damage to health and crops, as well as monetary gains of including climate change contributions. The analysis considers marginal abatement costs and compares air quality and climate damage in Euros. We optimize abatement policies with respect to both climate and health impacts, which imply implementingall measures that yield a netbenefit. The efficiency gains of the integrated policy are in the order of 2.5 billion Euros, compared to optimal abatement based on health and crop damage only, justifying increased abatement efforts of close to 50%. Climate effect of methane is the single most important factor. If climate change is considered on a 20- instead of a 100-year time-scale, the efficiency gain almost doubles. Our results indicate that air pollution policies should be supplemented with climate damage considerations. # 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

[1]  R. Betts,et al.  Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. Chapter 2 , 2007 .

[2]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[3]  R. Carel.  Chapter 3 – Health Aspects of Air Pollution , 1998 .

[4]  M. Holland,et al.  ExternE: externalities of energy: volume 7: methodology, 1998 update , 1999 .

[5]  Nadine Unger,et al.  Climate forcing and air quality change due to regional emissions reductions by economic sector , 2008 .

[6]  Kaarle Kupiainen,et al.  Scenarios of global anthropogenic emissions of air pollutants and methane until 2030 , 2007 .

[7]  Z. Klimont,et al.  Primary emissions of fine carbonaceous particles in Europe , 2007 .

[8]  T. Berntsen,et al.  Abatement of Greenhouse Gases: Does Location Matter? , 2006 .

[9]  G. Boer,et al.  Climate sensitivity and response , 2003 .

[10]  Daniel J. Jacob,et al.  Introduction to Atmospheric Chemistry , 1999 .

[11]  N. Stern.  The Economics of Climate Change: Implications of Climate Change for Development , 2007 .

[12]  R. Burnett,et al.  Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. , 2002, JAMA.

[13]  B. O’Neill,et al.  Climate change impacts are sensitive to the concentration stabilization path. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Robert Sausen,et al.  Metrics of Climate Change: Assessing Radiative Forcing and Emission Indices , 2003 .

[15]  David Pearce,et al.  POLICY FRAMEWORKS FOR THE ANCILLARY BENEFITS OF CLIMATE CHANGE POLICIES , 2000 .

[16]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[17]  Jesper Munksgaard,et al.  An environmental performance index for products reflecting damage costs , 2007 .

[18]  Denise L Mauzerall,et al.  Global health benefits of mitigating ozone pollution with methane emission controls. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Kristin Aunan,et al.  Tropospheric ozone and aerosols in climate agreements: scientific and political challenges , 2005 .

[20]  Paul Ekins,et al.  How large a carbon tax is justified by the secondary benefits of CO2 abatement , 1996 .

[21]  A. Chambers,et al.  World Energy Outlook 2008 , 2008 .

[22]  Torben K. Mideksa,et al.  Costs and global impacts of black carbon abatement strategies , 2009 .

[23]  A. Stohl.  Characteristics of atmospheric transport into the Arctic troposphere , 2006 .