Benchmarking analysis of three multimedia models: RESRAD, MMSOILS, and MEPAS

Multimedia modelers from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the United States Department of Energy (DOE) collaborated to conduct a comprehensive and quantitative benchmarking analysis of three multimedia models. The three models-RESRAD (DOE), MMSOILS (EPA), and MEPAS (DOE)-represent analytically based tools that are used by the respective agencies for performing human exposure and health risk assessments. The study is performed by individuals who participate directly in the ongoing design, development, and application of the models. A list of physical/chemical/biological processes related to multimedia-based exposure and risk assessment is first presented as a basis for comparing the overall capabilities of RESRAD, MMSOILS, and MEPAS. Model design, formulation, and function are then examined by applying the models to a series of hypothetical problems. Major components of the models (e.g., atmospheric, surface water, groundwater) are evaluated separately and then studied as part of an integrated system for the assessment of a multimedia release scenario to determine effects due to linking components of the models. Seven modeling scenarios are used in the conduct of this benchmarking study: (1) direct biosphere exposure, (2) direct release to the air, (3) direct release to the vadose zone, (4) direct release to the saturated zone, (5) direct release to surface water, (6) surface water hydrology, and (7) multimedia release. Study results show that the models differ with respect to (1) environmental processes included (i.e., model features) and (2) the mathematical formulation and assumptions related to the implementation of solutions (i.e., parameterization).

[1]  D. L. Strenge,et al.  Overview of the remedial action priority system (RAPS) , 1986 .

[2]  Washington Dc Usdoe,et al.  Demonstration of a computer model for residual radioactive material guidelines, RESRAD , 1989 .

[3]  C. Yu,et al.  Manual for implementing residual radioactive material guidelines using RESRAD, Version 5.0 , 1993 .

[4]  D. L. Strenge,et al.  Supplemental mathematical formulations: The Multimedia Environmental Pollutant Assessment System (MEPAS) , 1989 .

[5]  D. L. Strenge,et al.  Chemical data bases for the Multimedia Environmental Pollutant Assessment System (MEPAS) , 1989 .

[6]  W. B. Healy,et al.  Ingestion of soil by dairy cows , 1968 .

[7]  K. F. Eckerman,et al.  External exposure to radionuclides in air, water, and soil , 1996 .

[8]  E. Faillace,et al.  Data collection handbook to support modeling the impacts of radioactive material in soil , 1993 .

[9]  D. L. Strenge,et al.  Risk computation for environmental restoration activities , 1993 .

[10]  D. L. Strenge,et al.  Multimedia Environmental Pollutant Assessment System (MEPAS) application guidance , 1989 .

[11]  David J. LePoire,et al.  RESRAD-BUILD: A computer model for analyzing the radiological doses resulting from the remediation and occupancy of buildings contaminated with radioactive material , 1994 .

[12]  J. L. Stroh,et al.  Accounting for time-varying vadose-zone water fluxes caused by infiltration caps using the MEPAS transport, exposure, and risk assessment model , 1993 .

[13]  C. Yu.  A computer program for deriving soil cleanup criteria , 1990 .

[14]  C. W. Thornthwaite,et al.  Instructions and tables for computing potential evapotranspiration and the water balance , 1955 .

[15]  P. G. Doctor,et al.  Multimedia Environmental Pollutant Assessment System (MEPAS) sensitivity analysis of computer codes , 1990 .

[16]  Charley Yu,et al.  Methodology for setting cleanup criteria , 1993 .