Falling Weight Deflectometer for Estimating Subgrade Elastic Moduli

Subgrade soil characterization in terms of resilient modulus (M R ) is essential for pavement design/evaluation. Due to the complexity of the laboratory M R test procedure, highway agencies have been exploring nondestructive tests, such as the falling weight deflectometer. In this study, 12 test sections with subgrade reflecting a range of soil types (fine- and coarse-grain soils) were tested. Falling weight deflector measurements were conducted directly on the prepared subgrade, followed by thin-wall Shelby tube samples from depths up to 1.5 m for laboratory M R tests. Deflection measurements were repeated at the same locations after completion of pavement construction. Results showed that the backcalculated moduli of the prepared subgrade are in good agreement with the laboratory values. Due primarily to confinement and overburden pressure, the backcalculated subgrade modulus, based on deflection measurements on the finished pavement, increases approximately 40 and 100% for fine- and coarse-grain soil, respectively. The modulus increase is substantiated by complementary studies of 20 Mississippi long-term pavement performance sections. In light of these results, the AASHTO factor of 0.33 to adjust for the backcalculated moduli, computed from deflection measurements on finished pavements, warrants further scrutiny and revision.

[1]  W Heukelom,et al.  DYNAMIC TESTING AS A MEANS OF CONTROLLING PAVEMENTS DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION , 1962 .

[2]  Hugh W. Coleman,et al.  Experimentation and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers , 1989 .

[3]  K H Stokoe,et al.  DYNAMIC INTERPRETATION OF DYNAFLECT AND FALLING WEIGHT DEFLECTOMETER TESTS ON PAVEMENT SYSTEMS. INTERIM REPORT , 1985 .

[4]  D E Newcomb COMPARISONS OF FIELD AND LABORATORY ESTIMATED RESILIENT MODULI OF PAVEMENT MATERIALS (WITH DISCUSSION) , 1987 .

[5]  Frazier Parker,et al.  ESTIMATION OF PAVING MATERIALS DESIGN MODULI FROM FALLING WEIGHT DEFLECTOMETER MEASUREMENTS , 1991 .

[6]  Tom Scullion,et al.  MODULUS: A MICROCOMPUTER-BASED BACKCALCULATION SYSTEM , 1990 .

[7]  Robert L. Lytton,et al.  ACCURACY AND CONSISTENCY OF BACKCALCULATED PAVEMENT LAYER MODULI , 1991 .

[8]  H Von Quintus,et al.  DESIGN PAMPHLET FOR THE BACKCALCULATION OF PAVEMENT LAYER MODULI IN SUPPORT OF THE 1993 AASHTO GUIDE FOR THE DESIGN OF PAVEMENT STRUCTURES , 1997 .

[9]  N Paul Khosla,et al.  DETERMINATION OF LAYER MODULI USING A FALLING WEIGHT DEFLECTOMETER , 1987 .

[10]  Thomas R Burnham,et al.  INITIAL CHARACTERIZATION OF SUBGRADE SOILS AND GRANULAR BASE MATERIALS AT THE MINNESOTA ROAD RESEARCH PROJECT , 1995 .

[11]  Yang H. Huang,et al.  Pavement Analysis and Design , 1997 .

[12]  G. W. Snedecor Statistical Methods , 1964 .

[13]  William N. Houston,et al.  Laboratory versus Nondestructive Testing for Pavement Design , 1992 .

[14]  Trevor G Davies,et al.  THEORETICAL RESPONSE OF MULTILAYER PAVEMENT SYSTEMS TO DYNAMIC NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING. , 1985 .

[15]  G Chai,et al.  THE STRUCTURAL RESPONSE AND BEHAVIOUR PREDICTION OF SUBGRADE SOILS USING THE FALLING WEIGHT DEFLECTOMETER IN PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION , 1998 .

[16]  Rohan W. S. Perera,et al.  IMPACT OF NATURAL SITE VARIABILITY ON NONDESTRUCTIVE TEST DEFLECTION BASINS , 1991 .