Does preoperative patellofemoral joint state affect medial unicompartmental arthroplasty survival?

One contested contraindication to medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been status of the patellofemoral joint. Surgeons have avoided UKA when the patellofemoral joint has radiographic evidence of arthritic changes. However, recent studies advocate ignoring patellofemoral joint status when considering UKA. The purpose of this study was to compare the failure rate of mobile-bearing, medial UKA in patients with and without preoperative radiographic evidence of patellofemoral joint degeneration. Preoperative radiographs from a random selection of 503 patients (638 knees) treated with UKA for anteromedial osteoarthritis were assessed by an observer blinded to clinical outcome. The patellofemoral joint was graded using the modified Altman classification from 0 to 3 with 0 being no evidence of changes and 3 being severe, and identified 396 grade 0, 168 grade 1, 65 grade 2, and 9 grade 3 knees. At 1- to 7-year follow-up, there have been 17 revisions for overall survivorship of 97.3%. Kaplan-Meier analysis predicted 97.9% survival in knees with patellofemoral joint disease and 93.8% survival in knees without patellofemoral joint disease at 70 months (P=.1). Failure requiring revision occurred in 3.5% (14/396) of grade 0 knees, 1.2% (2/168) of grade 1, 1.5% (1/65) of grade 2, and 0% (0/9) of grade 3. No survival difference was noted between knees with medial or lateral patellofemoral joint disease (P=.1). No knees were revised for progression of disease in the patellofemoral joint or anterior knee pain. In light of this investigation and the work of others, preoperative radiographic changes in the patellofemoral joint can be safely ignored when considering patients for medial UKA without compromising survivorship.

[1]  H. Gill,et al.  The influence of the presence and severity of pre-existing patellofemoral degenerative changes on the outcome of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  D. Murray,et al.  Pre-operative clinical and radiological assessment of the patellofemoral joint in unicompartmental knee replacement and its influence on outcome. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  G. Gold,et al.  Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis, revised. , 2007, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[4]  A. Lombardi,et al.  Liberal indications for minimally invasive oxford unicondylar arthroplasty provide rapid functional recovery and pain relief. , 2007, Surgical technology international.

[5]  P. Lewis,et al.  Patient-Perceived Outcomes and Return to Sport and Work: TKA Versus Mini-Incision Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty , 2010, The journal of knee surgery.

[6]  D. Murray,et al.  Simultaneous in vitro measurement of patellofemoral kinematics and forces following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  M. Agarwal,et al.  Sporting and physical activity following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. , 2006, The Knee.

[8]  M Lequesne,et al.  Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis. , 1995, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[9]  S. Stern,et al.  Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. An evaluation of selection criteria. , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  J. Goodfellow,et al.  Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  R. Scott,et al.  Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  J. O'Connor,et al.  Clinical results of the Oxford knee. Surface arthroplasty of the tibiofemoral joint with a meniscal bearing prosthesis. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.