Sarcasm Detection : Building a Contextual Hierarchy

The conundrum of understanding and classifying sarcasm has been dealt with by the traditional theorists as an analysis of a sarcastic utterance and the ironic situation that surrounds it. The problem with such an approach is that it is too narrow, as it is unable to sufficiently utilize the two indispensable agents in making such an utterance, viz. the speaker and the listener. It undermines the necessary context required to comprehend a sarcastic utterance. In this paper, we propose a novel approach towards understanding sarcasm in terms of the existing knowledge hierarchy between the two participants, which forms the basis of the context that both agents share. The difference in relationship of the speaker of the sarcastic utterance and the disparate audience found on social media, such as Twitter, is also captured. We then apply our model on a corpus of tweets to achieve significant results and consequently, shed light on subjective nature of context, which is contingent on the relation between the speaker and the listener.

[1]  Horacio Saggion,et al.  Modelling Sarcasm in Twitter, a Novel Approach , 2014, WASSA@ACL.

[2]  Rob Hopkins,et al.  Mimesis As Make‐Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts , 1992 .

[3]  Deirdre Wilson,et al.  The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence? , 2006 .

[4]  Dan Sperber,et al.  Verbal irony: Pretense or echoic mention? , 1984 .

[5]  David Bamman,et al.  Contextualized Sarcasm Detection on Twitter , 2015, ICWSM.

[6]  Paolo Rosso,et al.  SemEval-2015 Task 11: Sentiment Analysis of Figurative Language in Twitter , 2015, *SEMEVAL.

[7]  Nina Wacholder,et al.  Identifying Sarcasm in Twitter: A Closer Look , 2011, ACL.

[8]  Dipti Misra Sharma,et al.  Shallow Parsing Pipeline - Hindi-English Code-Mixed Social Media Text , 2016, NAACL.

[9]  Christopher Potts,et al.  Recursive Deep Models for Semantic Compositionality Over a Sentiment Treebank , 2013, EMNLP.

[10]  S. Glucksberg,et al.  How about another piece of pie: the allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  Benny P.H. Lee,et al.  Mutual knowledge, background knowledge and shared beliefs: Their roles in establishing common ground , 2001 .

[12]  H. Grice Reasoning: Further Notes on Logic and Conversation , 2008 .

[13]  Ellen Riloff,et al.  Sarcasm as Contrast between a Positive Sentiment and Negative Situation , 2013, EMNLP.

[14]  Elisabeth Camp Sarcasm, Pretense, and The Semantics/ Pragmatics Distinction ∗ , 2012 .

[15]  Pushpak Bhattacharyya,et al.  Harnessing Context Incongruity for Sarcasm Detection , 2015, ACL.

[16]  Gregory Currie Why Irony is Pretence , 2006 .

[17]  Ari Rappoport,et al.  Semi-Supervised Recognition of Sarcasm in Twitter and Amazon , 2010, CoNLL.

[18]  Paolo Rosso,et al.  Figurative messages and affect in Twitter: Differences between #irony, #sarcasm and #not , 2016, Knowl. Based Syst..

[19]  Ari Rappoport,et al.  ICWSM - A Great Catchy Name: Semi-Supervised Recognition of Sarcastic Sentences in Online Product Reviews , 2010, ICWSM.

[20]  Brendan T. O'Connor,et al.  Part-of-Speech Tagging for Twitter: Annotation, Features, and Experiments , 2010, ACL.

[21]  Mihaela Popa-Wyatt Pretence and Echo: Towards an Integrated Account of Verbal Irony , 2014 .

[22]  Richard J. Gerrig,et al.  On the pretense theory of irony. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.