Pattern electroretinograms and visual-evoked potentials in glaucoma and multiple sclerosis.

Steady-state visual-evoked potentials and electroretinograms were simultaneously recorded in four patients with glaucoma and in five patients with multiple sclerosis. The stimuli included a homogenous field and a 2.3 cycles per degree sinusoidal grating that were counter-phase modulated at the rate of 7.5 Hz. We used narrow bandwidth spectral analysis to measure the response amplitudes and signal-to-noise ratios. Transient pattern visual-evoked potentials (1 Hz) were also measured for latency in each eye. We found abnormal pattern electroretinograms, based on the absence of a significant second harmonic component, in three of the four glaucomatous eyes although the homogenous field electroretinograms were normal. In the patients with multiple sclerosis, the pattern electroretinograms were abnormal in two eyes, but the transient visual-evoked potential latency had the highest diagnostic yield (seven of ten eyes).

[1]  J. Dowling,et al.  Intracellular responses of the Müller (glial) cells of mudpuppy retina: their relation to b-wave of the electroretinogram. , 1970, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  J. Sherman SIMULTANEOUS PATTERN‐REVERSAL ELECTRORETINOGRAMS AND VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIALS IN DISEASES OF THE MACULA AND OPTIC NERVE , 1980 .

[3]  K. Brown,et al.  The electroretinogram: its components and their origins. , 1968, UCLA forum in medical sciences.

[4]  C. D. Hendley,et al.  Visual evoked potentials and the visuogram in multiple sclerosis , 1979, Annals of neurology.

[5]  M. Ebe,et al.  CLINICAL EVALUATION OF ELECTRICAL RESPONSES OF RETINA AND VISUAL CORTEX TO PHOTIC STIMULATION IN OPHTHALMIC DISEASES. , 1964, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine.

[6]  G. Westheimer,et al.  The spatial properties of the human electroretinogram. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  D. Spinelli,et al.  The ERG in response to alternating gratings in patients with diseases of the peripheral visual pathway. , 1981, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  A. Fiorentini,et al.  Electroretinographic responses to alternating gratings before and after section of the optic nerve. , 1981, Science.

[9]  Henkes He The electroretinogram in glaucoma. , 1951 .

[10]  W. Dawson,et al.  Human pattern-evoked retinal responses are altered by optic atrophy. , 1982, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  I. Bodis-Wollner,et al.  Abnormalities of the Visual System in Ocular Hypertension and Glaucoma: Seeing Beyond Routine Perimetry , 1983 .

[12]  J. May,et al.  Loss in pattern-elicited electroretinograms in optic nerve dysfunction. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  D. Alvis Electroretinographic changes in controlled chronic open-angle glaucoma. , 1966, American journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  Vaegan,et al.  CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE THAT THE PATTERN ELECTRORETINOGRAM (PERG) IS GENERATED IN MORE PROXIMAL RETINAL LAYERS THAN THE FOCAL ELECTRORETINOGRAM (FERG) , 1980, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[15]  S. Coupland,et al.  Abnormal pattern electroretinograms with macular cherry-red spots: evidence for selective ganglion cell damage. , 1981, Current eye research.

[16]  D. Regan,et al.  COMPARISON OF TRANSIENT AND STEADY‐STATE METHODS * , 1980, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.