Unpredictable Reconfigurations: The Dilemma of the Post-Merger Information Systems Integration1

A merger is the result of a strategic decision aimed at creating synergy. Notwithstanding mergers’ expected benefits, their outcomes are often beset by problems such as employees’ high levels of stress, dissatisfaction and resistance. Research suggests that these problems are often related to the issue of boundary management during the post-merger integration phase (PMI), which refers to the degree of integration required among the merging parties and the degree of autonomy, that each must retain for the merger to achieve synergy. The literature identifies information systems (IS) as being a key enabler of successful mergers and suggests that during PMI, new ISs that span the boundaries of the previously independent firms need to be implemented to facilitate a specific level of integration. Yet, there is a paucity of studies on the issue of boundary management at the information technology (IT) level during PMI. Adopting a sociomaterial perspective and based on a qualitative study within a healthcare organization, the authors find that post-merger practices were the result of dialectic processes of resistance to, and negotiation of, the IS reconfiguration after its implementation.

[1]  Jian Chen,et al.  What leads to post-implementation success of ERP? An empirical study of the Chinese retail industry , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[2]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[3]  Mark Shanley,et al.  Agreement between top management teams and expectations for post acquisition performance , 1992 .

[4]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  A Longitudinal Model of Continued IS Use: An Integrative View of Four Mechanisms Underlying Postadoption Phenomena , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Sue Newell,et al.  Understanding Project Survival in an ES Environment: A Sociomaterial Practice Perspective , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Cross-Business Information Technology Integration and Acquirer Value Creation in Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[8]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[9]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  S. Finkelstein,et al.  Integrating Strategic, Organizational, and Human Resource Perspectives on Mergers and Acquisitions: a Case Study of Synergy Realization , 1999 .

[11]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[12]  A. Pettigrew WHAT IS A PROCESSUAL ANALYSIS. , 1997 .

[13]  Mitchell Lee Marks,et al.  Making mergers and acquisitions work: Strategic and psychological preparation , 2001 .

[14]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[16]  Terri L. Griffith Technology Features as Triggers for Sensemaking , 1999 .

[17]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[18]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  An assessment of package–organisation misalignment: institutional and ontological structures , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: post‐acquisition strategies and integration capability in U.S. bank mergers , 2004 .

[20]  Amy L. Pablo Determinants of acquisition integration level: A decision-making perspective. , 1994 .

[21]  Chian-Son Yu,et al.  Causes influencing the effectiveness of the post-implementation ERP system , 2005, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[22]  W. Orlikowski Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[23]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Closing the gap: towards a process model of post‐merger knowledge sharing , 2007, Inf. Syst. J..

[24]  K. Brown,et al.  Using order statistics to estimate real estate bid distributions , 1986 .

[25]  Sung S. Kim,et al.  Out of Dedication or Constraint? A Dual Model of Post-Adoption Phenomena and its Empirical Test in the Context of Online Services , 2009, MIS Q..

[26]  Sue Newell,et al.  Accounting logics, reconfiguration of ERP systems and the emergence of new accounting practices: A sociomaterial perspective , 2011 .

[27]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  An Institutional Analysis of Pluralistic Responses to Enterprise System Implementations , 2007, ICIS.

[28]  Lars Schweizer ORGANIZATIONAL INTEGRATION OF ACQUIRED BIOTECHNOLOGY COMPANIES INTO PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES: THE NEED FOR A HYBRID APPROACH , 2005 .

[29]  Philip Yetton,et al.  Integrating information technology divisions in a bank merger Fit, compatibility and models of change , 1996, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[30]  W. Orlikowski Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[31]  Ben Light,et al.  A stage maturity model for enterprise resource planning systems use , 2001, DATB.

[32]  Annette L. Ranft,et al.  Acquiring New Technologies and Capabilities: A Grounded Model of Acquisition Implementation , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[33]  Ben Light,et al.  A Critical Success Factors Model for ERP Implementation , 1999, IEEE Softw..

[34]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[35]  Stefan Henningsson,et al.  Managing the IT Integration of Acquisitions by Multi-Business Organizations , 2011, ICIS.

[36]  David M. Schweiger,et al.  Integrating mergers and acquisitions: An international research review , 2000 .

[37]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Moving Beyond Intentions and Toward the Theory of Trying: Effects of Work Environment and Gender on Post-Adoption Information Technology Use , 2005, MIS Q..

[38]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..