NAPR: a Cloud-Based Framework for Neuroanatomical Age Prediction

The availability of cloud computing services has enabled the widespread adoption of the “software as a service” (SaaS) approach for software distribution, which utilizes network-based access to applications running on centralized servers. In this paper we apply the SaaS approach to neuroimaging-based age prediction. Our system, named “NAPR” (Neuroanatomical Age Prediction using R), provides access to predictive modeling software running on a persistent cloud-based Amazon Web Services (AWS) compute instance. The NAPR framework allows external users to estimate the age of individual subjects using cortical thickness maps derived from their own locally processed T1-weighted whole brain MRI scans. As a demonstration of the NAPR approach, we have developed two age prediction models that were trained using healthy control data from the ABIDE, CoRR, DLBS and NKI Rockland neuroimaging datasets (total N = 2367, age range 6–89 years). The provided age prediction models were trained using (i) relevance vector machines and (ii) Gaussian processes machine learning methods applied to cortical thickness surfaces obtained using Freesurfer v5.3. We believe that this transparent approach to out-of-sample evaluation and comparison of neuroimaging age prediction models will facilitate the development of improved age prediction models and allow for robust evaluation of the clinical utility of these methods.

[1]  Stuart J. Ritchie,et al.  Brain age predicts mortality , 2017, Molecular Psychiatry.

[2]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  Predicting brain-age from multimodal imaging data captures cognitive impairment , 2016, NeuroImage.

[3]  E. Feczko,et al.  Motion‐related artifacts in structural brain images revealed with independent estimates of in‐scanner head motion , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[4]  Stefan Klöppel,et al.  Estimating the age of healthy subjects from T1-weighted MRI scans using kernel methods: Exploring the influence of various parameters , 2010, NeuroImage.

[5]  Daniel P. Kennedy,et al.  The Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange: Towards Large-Scale Evaluation of the Intrinsic Brain Architecture in Autism , 2013, Molecular Psychiatry.

[6]  J. Giedd,et al.  Subtle in‐scanner motion biases automated measurement of brain anatomy from in vivo MRI , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[7]  Christian Gaser,et al.  Gender-specific impact of personal health parameters on individual brain aging in cognitively unimpaired elderly subjects , 2014, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[8]  Arno Klein,et al.  Large-scale evaluation of ANTs and FreeSurfer cortical thickness measurements , 2014, NeuroImage.

[9]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  Predicting brain-age from multimodal imaging data captures cognitive impairment , 2016 .

[10]  Bing Chen,et al.  An open science resource for establishing reliability and reproducibility in functional connectomics , 2014, Scientific Data.

[11]  P. Matthews,et al.  Multimodal population brain imaging in the UK Biobank prospective epidemiological study , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  kernlab - An S4 Package for Kernel Methods in R , 2004 .

[13]  A M Dale,et al.  Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  David N. Kennedy,et al.  The Three NITRCs: A Guide to Neuroimaging Neuroinformatics Resources , 2015, Neuroinformatics.

[15]  Janaina Mourão Miranda,et al.  PRoNTo: Pattern Recognition for Neuroimaging Toolbox , 2013, Neuroinformatics.

[16]  Wiepke Cahn,et al.  Accelerated Brain Aging in Schizophrenia: A Longitudinal Pattern Recognition Study. , 2016, The American journal of psychiatry.

[17]  Robert Leech,et al.  Prediction of brain age suggests accelerated atrophy after traumatic brain injury , 2015, Annals of neurology.

[18]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Prediction of Individual Brain Maturity Using fMRI , 2010, Science.

[19]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[20]  Jeroen Ooms,et al.  The OpenCPU System: Towards a Universal Interface for Scientific Computing through Separation of Concerns , 2014, ArXiv.

[21]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[22]  Christopher K. I. Williams,et al.  Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning) , 2005 .

[23]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  BIDS apps: Improving ease of use, accessibility, and reproducibility of neuroimaging data analysis methods , 2016, bioRxiv.

[24]  Heath R. Pardoe,et al.  Motion and morphometry in clinical and nonclinical populations , 2016, NeuroImage.

[25]  M. Dylan Tisdall,et al.  Head motion during MRI acquisition reduces gray matter volume and thickness estimates , 2015, NeuroImage.

[26]  Giovanni Montana,et al.  Predicting brain age with deep learning from raw imaging data results in a reliable and heritable biomarker , 2016, NeuroImage.

[27]  D. Belsky,et al.  Quantification of biological aging in young adults , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Eileen Luders,et al.  Brain maturation: Predicting individual BrainAGE in children and adolescents using structural MRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[29]  Julio Acosta-Cabronero,et al.  Brain-predicted age in Down syndrome is associated with beta amyloid deposition and cognitive decline , 2017, Neurobiology of Aging.

[30]  E. Crone,et al.  Sex differences and structural brain maturation from childhood to early adulthood , 2013, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  Margaret D. King,et al.  The NKI-Rockland Sample: A Model for Accelerating the Pace of Discovery Science in Psychiatry , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[32]  Eileen Luders,et al.  Estimating brain age using high-resolution pattern recognition: Younger brains in long-term meditation practitioners , 2016, NeuroImage.

[33]  Yaroslav O. Halchenko,et al.  Open is Not Enough. Let's Take the Next Step: An Integrated, Community-Driven Computing Platform for Neuroscience , 2012, Front. Neuroinform..

[34]  Denise C. Park,et al.  &bgr;-Amyloid burden in healthy aging: Regional distribution and cognitive consequences , 2012, Neurology.

[35]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Accelerated brain aging in schizophrenia and beyond: a neuroanatomical marker of psychiatric disorders. , 2014, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[36]  George Eastman House,et al.  Sparse Bayesian Learning and the Relevance Vector Machine , 2001 .

[37]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Nipype: A Flexible, Lightweight and Extensible Neuroimaging Data Processing Framework in Python , 2011, Front. Neuroinform..

[38]  R. Woods,et al.  Sex differences in cortical thickness mapped in 176 healthy individuals between 7 and 87 years of age. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  Beatriz Luna,et al.  The Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange (ABIDE) consortium: open sharing of autism resting state fMRI data , 2012 .

[40]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments , 2016, Scientific Data.

[41]  Sun I. Kim,et al.  Gender difference analysis of cortical thickness in healthy young adults with surface-based methods , 2006, NeuroImage.

[42]  David N. Kennedy,et al.  Neuroimaging Informatics Tools and Resources Clearinghouse (NITRC) Resource Announcement , 2009, Neuroinformatics.

[43]  Michael W. L. Chee,et al.  Brain Structure in Young and Old East Asians and Westerners: Comparisons of Structural Volume and Cortical Thickness , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  Stefan Klöppel,et al.  BrainAGE in Mild Cognitive Impaired Patients: Predicting the Conversion to Alzheimer’s Disease , 2013, PloS one.