Children use non-verbal cues to learn new words from robots as well as people

Abstract Social robots are innovative new technologies that have considerable potential to support children’s education as tutors and learning companions. Given this potential, it behooves us to study the mechanisms by which children learn from social robots, as well as the similarities and differences between children’s learning from robots as compared to human partners. In the present study, we examined whether young children will attend to the same nonverbal social cues from a robot as from a human partner during a word learning task, specifically gaze and bodily orientation to an unfamiliar referent. Thirty-six children viewed images of unfamiliar animals with a human and with a robot. The interlocutor (human or robot) oriented toward, and provided names for, some of the animals, and children were given a posttest to assess their recall of the names. We found that children performed equally well on the recall test whether they had been provided with names by the robot or by the human. Moreover, in each case, their performance was constrained by the spatial distinctiveness of nonverbal orientation cues available to determine which animal was being referred to during naming.

[1]  H. Wellman,et al.  Infants' ability to connect gaze and emotional expression to intentional action , 2002, Cognition.

[2]  Javier R. Movellan,et al.  Sociable robot improves toddler vocabulary skills , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[3]  David Willoughby,et al.  Do ABC eBooks boost engagement and learning in preschoolers? An experimental study comparing eBooks with paper ABC and storybook controls , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Evidence for referential understanding in the emotions domain at twelve and eighteen months. , 2001, Child development.

[5]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  The Robot Who Tried Too Hard: Social Behaviour of a Robot Tutor Can Negatively Affect Child Learning , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[6]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Can a Social Robot Stimulate Science Curiosity in Classrooms? , 2015, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[7]  Brian T. Gill,et al.  "Robovie, you'll have to go into the closet now": children's social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. , 2012, Developmental psychology.

[8]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Young Children Treat Robots as Informants , 2016, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[9]  Adam Setapen,et al.  Creating robotic characters for long-term interaction , 2012 .

[10]  Diane Poulin-Dubois,et al.  Can Infants Use a Nonhuman Agent's Gaze Direction to Establish Word-Object Relations? , 2009, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[11]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Infants' ability to consult the speaker for clues to word reference , 1993, Journal of Child Language.

[12]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  The Interplay of Robot Language Level with Children's Language Learning during Storytelling , 2015, HRI.

[13]  L. Markson,et al.  Evidence against a dedicated system for word learning in children , 1997, Nature.

[14]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  A Comparison of Children Learning New Words from Robots , Tablets , & People , 2015 .

[15]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Infants' contribution to the achievement of joint reference. , 1991, Child development.

[16]  P. Kuhl Social Mechanisms in Early Language Acquisition: Understanding Integrated Brain Systems Supporting Language , 2011 .

[17]  Larissa K. Samuelson,et al.  Fast Mapping but Poor Retention by 24-Month-Old Infants. , 2008, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[18]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Robotic learning companions for early language development , 2013, ICMI '13.

[19]  Mohammad Obaid,et al.  Comparing a humanoid tutor to a human tutor delivering an instructional task to children , 2014, 2014 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[20]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  Heart vs hard drive: Children learn more from a human tutor than a social robot , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[21]  Jacqueline Kory,et al.  Storytelling with robots : effects of robot language level on children's language learning , 2014 .

[22]  Natalie Anne Freed,et al.  "This is the fluffy robot that only speaks French" : language use between preschoolers, their families, and a social robot while sharing virtual toys , 2012 .

[23]  F. F. Strayer,et al.  The Emergence of Same-Sex Affiliative Preferences among Preschool Peers: A Developmental/Ethological Perspective. , 1984 .

[24]  F. Tanaka,et al.  Children teach a care-receiving robot to promote their learning , 2012, J. Hum. Robot Interact..

[25]  P. Kuhl Is speech learning 'gated' by the social brain? , 2007, Developmental science.

[26]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  "Social" robots are psychological agents for infants: A test of gaze following , 2010, Neural Networks.

[27]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Grounding Word Learning in Space , 2011, PloS one.

[28]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Joint Attention without Gaze Following: Human Infants and Their Parents Coordinate Visual Attention to Objects through Eye-Hand Coordination , 2013, PloS one.

[29]  Fabio Tesser,et al.  Multimodal child-robot interaction: building social bonds , 2013, HRI 2013.

[30]  Jonathan D. Lane,et al.  Infants Understand How Testimony Works , 2013, Topoi.

[31]  Roger K. Moore,et al.  Towards a Synthetic Tutor Assistant: The EASEL Project and its Architecture , 2016, Living Machines.

[32]  Wolmet Barendregt,et al.  Robots Tutoring Children: Longitudinal Evaluation of Social Engagement in Child-Robot Interaction , 2016, NordiCHI.