Specification and initial evaluation of a multiple application teleradiology system.

The digitization and transmission of medical images is becoming increasingly more important and available. The selection of appropriate clinical applications for teleradiology systems is an important factor in determining the success of such ventures. In this paper, the selection of such applications and the evaluation of the teleradiology system is described. The system (LIAISON, CAPTEC Ltd, Malahide, Ireland) is PC based and is capable of digitization and transmission of three categories of medical images: (1) plain film radiographs; (2) CT film data and (3) video sequences such as ultrasound scans. A comprehensive technical evaluation was carried out on the acquisition and display station in which various parameters such as spatial resolution, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and distortion were investigated. Results showed that the system performed well within specifications. An exploratory clinical evaluation was performed using a case mix of subtle fractures, chests and dislocations, and CT scans. Here the system performed well with a diagnostic accuracy of 95% for the digital image compared with the analogue image.

[1]  G. Mancini,et al.  Quantitative coronary angiography , 1994 .

[2]  F A DiBianca,et al.  The effect of varying spatial resolution on the detectability of diffuse pulmonary nodules. Assessment with digitized conventional radiographs. , 1981, Radiology.

[3]  M D Murphey,et al.  Digital skeletal radiography: spatial resolution requirements for detection of subperiosteal resorption. , 1989, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  H. Feigenbaum.  A digital echocardiographic laboratory. , 1994, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[5]  P M Lams,et al.  Spatial resolution requirements for digital chest radiographs: an ROC study of observer performance in selected cases. , 1986, Radiology.

[6]  Clinical diagnosis from digital displays: results and conclusions from the St Mary's evaluation project. , 1994, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  P R Mueller,et al.  New high-resolution teleradiology system: prospective study of diagnostic accuracy in 685 transmitted clinical cases. , 1993, Radiology.

[8]  D R Aberle,et al.  Comparison of 2048-line digital display formats and conventional radiographs: an ROC study. , 1989, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  K Doi,et al.  Digital Mammography: ROC Studies of the Effects of Pixel Size and Unsharp-Mask Filtering on the Detection of Subtle Microcalcifications , 1987 .

[10]  C. Carl Jaffe.  Lecture to American College of Radiology , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  John R. Bentsen,et al.  Neuroradiology viewing station , 1990, Medical Imaging.

[12]  J R Yarwood,et al.  Image processing of digital chest ionograms. , 1988, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  Stephen Baiter,et al.  Digital imaging of the chest , 1985, Radiology.

[14]  W D Foley,et al.  Digital and conventional chest images: observer performance with Film Digital Radiography System. , 1986, Radiology.

[15]  S C Kao,et al.  Teleradiology for a family practice center. , 1989, JAMA.

[16]  D W Piraino,et al.  Comparison of digital and conventional musculoskeletal radiography: an observer performance study. , 1990, Radiology.

[17]  D Magid,et al.  Subtle orthopedic fractures: teleradiology workstation versus film interpretation. , 1993, Radiology.

[18]  C. Flagle,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis of fracture and pneumonia detection: comparison of laser-digitized workstation images and conventional analog radiographs. , 1993, Radiology.

[19]  Bruce Kuo Ting Ho,et al.  ROC comparison of compressed images to original analog film and digital hardcopy , 1990, Medical Imaging.

[20]  S J Dwyer,et al.  Nondisplaced fractures: spatial resolution requirements for detection with digital skeletal imaging. , 1990, Radiology.