Effectiveness as Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Conceptions of Organizational Effectiveness

Attention to the subject of organizational effectiveness has been increasing in the last several years as popular management books have extolled management excellence, almost two million jobs have been lost due to poor U.S. competitiveness, and economic conditions have put pressure on organizations to become more accountable with their resources. However, despite its popularity, much confusion continues in the organizational literature regarding the definition, circumscription, and appropriate criteria for assessing effectiveness. In this paper, I summarize what areas are becoming consensual among most writers on effectiveness, and I point out continuing areas of disagreement and conflict. The five statements summarizing consensual characteristics of effectiveness and the three statements summarizing areas of continuing conflict point out that agreement about effectiveness is mainly an agreement to disagree. Conflicts center mainly on the incompatibility and inappropriateness of commonly selected criteria. The main theme of the paper, however, is a discussion of an inherent, but largely ignored, characteristic of effectiveness in organizations-the paradoxical nature of effectiveness criteria. This discussion illustrates that the most effective organizations are also those characterized by paradoxes-i.e., contradictions, simultaneous opposites, and incompatibilities. Taking account of this characteristic helps explain one reason why so much confusion and disagreement continues to surround effectiveness, and it uncovers a new set of research questions that can guide future investigations. Some suggestions are provided for how research on paradoxes in effectiveness might be pursued in the future.

[1]  A. Lewin,et al.  Determining organizational effectiveness: another look, and an agenda for research , 1986 .

[2]  N. Tichy.  Managing strategic change: Technical, political, and cultural dynamics , 1985 .

[3]  K. Cameron.  Cultural Congruence, Strength, and Type: Relationships to Effectiveness , 1985 .

[4]  G. Huber.  The Nature and Design of Post-Industrial Organizations , 1984 .

[5]  K. Cameron,et al.  Organizational Adaptation and Higher Education. , 1984 .

[6]  E. Chaffee.  Successful Strategic Management in Small Private Colleges. , 1984 .

[7]  D. Whetten,et al.  Organizational Effectiveness: A Comparison of Multiple Models , 1984 .

[8]  K. Cameron.  Strategic Responses to Conditions of Decline: Higher Education and the Private Sector. , 1983 .

[9]  Kim S. Cameron,et al.  A Study of Organizational Effectiveness and Its Predictors. ASHE 1983 Annual Meeting Paper. , 1983 .

[10]  John Rohrbaugh,et al.  A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis , 1983 .

[11]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  7 – On the Demise of Organizational Effectiveness Studies1 , 1983 .

[12]  Noel M. Tichy,et al.  Managing strategic change , 1983 .

[13]  Walter R. Nord,et al.  5 – A Political–Economic Perspective on Organizational Effectiveness , 1983 .

[14]  K. Cameron,et al.  Organizational Life Cycles and Shifting Criteria of Effectiveness: Some Preliminary Evidence , 1983 .

[15]  K. Cameron,et al.  Coffin nails and corporate strategies , 1982 .

[16]  R. Guzzo.  Improving group decision making in organizations : approaches from theory and research , 1982 .

[17]  David A. Whetten,et al.  Perceptions of Organizational Effectiveness Across Organizational Life Cycles. , 1981 .

[18]  D. Whetten.  Organizational Responses to Scarcity: Exploring the Obstacles to Innovative Approaches.to Retrenchment in Education , 1981 .

[19]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  Organizational Effectiveness and Organizational Behavior: A Critical Perspective. , 1981 .

[20]  John Rohrbaugh,et al.  Operationalizing the Competing Values Approach: Measuring Performance in the Employment Service , 1981 .

[21]  Gareth Morgan,et al.  The Schismatic Metaphor and Its Implications for Organizational Analysis , 1981 .

[22]  James Martin.  Telematic society: A challenge for tomorrow , 1981 .

[23]  Wendell Bell,et al.  The Third Wave. , 1982 .

[24]  Michael Keeley,et al.  Organizational Analogy: A Comparison of Organismic and Social Contract Models. , 1980 .

[25]  Peter F. Drucker,et al.  Managing in Turbulent Times , 1980 .

[26]  Kim S. Cameron,et al.  Measuring Organizational Effectiveness in Institutions of Higher Education. , 1978 .

[27]  David A. Whetten,et al.  Coping with Incompatible Expectations: An Integrated View of Role Conflict. , 1978 .

[28]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[29]  M Keeley,et al.  A social-justice approach to organizational evaluation. , 1978, Administrative science quarterly.

[30]  D. Whetten.  COPING WITH INCOMPATIBLE EXPECTATIONS:: ROLE CONFLICT AMONG DIRECTORS OF MANPOWER AGENCIES , 1978 .

[31]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[32]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[33]  E. F. Schumacher,et al.  A Guide for the Perplexed , 1977 .

[34]  C. H. Waddington,et al.  Evolution and Consciousness: Human Systems in Transition , 1976 .

[35]  O. Williamson.  Markets and Hierarchies , 1975 .

[36]  D. Bell.  The Coming of the Post-Industrial Society , 1973 .

[37]  K. Arrow.  Higher education as a filter , 1973 .

[38]  Zbigniew Brzezinski,et al.  Between two ages : America's role in the technetronic era , 1972 .

[39]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approaches to the Study of Information Processing in Judgment. , 1971 .

[40]  F. Friedlander,et al.  Components of Effectiveness in Small Organizations , 1968 .

[41]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[42]  E. Johnsen.  Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[43]  Magoroh Maruyama,et al.  THE SECOND CYBERNETICS Deviation-Amplifying Mutual Causal Processes , 1963 .

[44]  C. Lindblom.  THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGH , 1959 .

[45]  C. Bernard.  Medical Classic. (Book Reviews: An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine) , 1957 .