Visual detection of signals in the presence of continuous and pulsed backqrounds

The detectability of intensity increments in the presence of continuous and pulsed backgrounds was investigated using a two-alternative, temporal, forced-choice procedure. Differences were found in intensity-duration reciprocity relations, the form of the Weber function, and the shape of the psychometric function between continuous- and pulsed-detection conditions. In a second study, signals were added either to a steady background (simple detection) or to background plus pedestal (pedestal detection). Two unusual phenomena were noted, namely, “negative masking” and the “pedestal effect.” The interpretation of the results in terms of a simple, Poisson-detection model is discussed.

[1]  N. R. Bartlett,et al.  The discrimination of two simultaneously presented brightnesses. , 1942 .

[2]  H. Vries.  The quantum character of light and its bearing upon threshold of vision, the differential sensitivity and visual acuity of the eye , 1943 .

[3]  A. Rose.  The sensitivity performance of the human eye on an absolute scale. , 1948, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[4]  C. G. Mueller,et al.  Quantum concepts in visual intensity-discrimination. , 1950, The American journal of psychology.

[5]  R. M. Herrick.  Foveal luminance discrimination as a function of the duration of the decrement or increment in luminance. , 1956 .

[6]  A. Rosenfalck,et al.  Spectral energy calibration of a light flash source used in physiological experiments. , 1957, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[7]  H B BARLOW,et al.  Increment thresholds at low intensities considered as signal/noise discriminations , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  P. B. Elliott,et al.  Tables of d , 1959 .

[9]  D. M. Green,et al.  Psychoacoustics and Detection Theory , 1960 .

[10]  David M. Green,et al.  Effects of Background Noise on Auditory Detection of Noise Bursts , 1962 .

[11]  H R BLACKWELL,et al.  Neural theories of simple visual discriminations. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[12]  J. P. Egan.  Masking‐Level Differences as a Function of Interaural Disparities in Intensity of Signal and of Noise , 1964 .

[13]  T. Cornsweet,et al.  Luminance discrimination of brief flashes under various conditions of adaptation , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  Masker Level and Sinusoidal-Signal Detection , 1965 .

[15]  Effect of Duration on Detection of a Noise Signal , 1966 .

[16]  Micheal Treisman,et al.  A statistical decision model for sensory discrimination which predicts Weber’s law and other sensory laws: Some results of a computer simulation , 1966 .

[17]  E. Baumgardt,et al.  Facilitation effect of background light on target detection: a test of theories of absolute threshold. , 1965, Vision research.

[18]  Shifts in auditory thresholds produced by ipsilateral and contralateral maskers at low-intensity levels. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Effect of Duration upon Detection with Gated and Continuous Noise and Signal , 1966 .

[20]  B. Leshowitz,et al.  Effects of Stimulus Duration on the Detection of Sinusoids Added to Continuous Pedestals , 1966 .

[21]  Comments on “Effects of Waveform Correlation and Signal Duration on Detection of Noise Bursts in Continuous Noise” [D. H. Raab, E. Osman, and E. Rich, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 35, 1942–1946 (1963)] , 1966 .

[22]  Photosensitization and intrinsic noise in the visual system. , 1966, Vision research.

[23]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .