Facets of operational performance in an emergency room (ER)

This paper, using detailed time measurements of patients complemented by interviews with hospital management and staff, examines three facets of an emergency room's (ER) operational performance: (1) effectiveness of the triage system in rationing patient treatment; (2) factors influencing ER's operational performance in general and the trade-offs in flow times, inventory levels (that is the number of patients waiting in the system), and resource utilization; (3) the impacts of potential process and staffing changes to improve the ER's performance. Specifically, the paper discusses four proposals for streamlining the patient flow: establishing designated tracks ("fast track," "diagnostic track"), creating a "holding" area for certain type of patients, introducing a protocol that would reduce the load on physicians by allowing a registered nurse to order testing and treatment for some patients, and potentially and in the longer term, moving from non-ER specialist physicians to ER specialists. The paper's findings are based on analyzing the paths and flow times of close to two thousand patients in the emergency room of the Medical Center of Leeuwarden (MCL), The Netherlands. Using exploratory data analysis the paper presents generalizable findings about the impacts of various factors on ER's lead-time performance and shows how the proposals fit with well-documented process improvement theories.

[1]  Sándor Kerekes,et al.  Evaluation of corporate environmental management approaches: A framework and application , 1996 .

[2]  J. McMillan,et al.  Satisfaction with hospital emergency department as a function of patient triage , 1986, Health care management review.

[3]  Gerard FitzGerald,et al.  Emergency department triage revisited , 2009, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[4]  E H Dykstra,et al.  International models for the practice of emergency care. , 1997, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[5]  R Steinbrook,et al.  The role of the emergency department. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  D. King,et al.  Redesigning emergency department patient flows: Application of Lean Thinking to health care , 2006, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[7]  Behnam Malakooti,et al.  Integrated group technology, cell formation, process planning, and production planning with application to the emergency room , 2004 .

[8]  S Read,et al.  Differences in priorities assigned to patients by triage nurses and by consultant physicians in accident and emergency departments. , 1993, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[9]  Walalce J. Hopp.  Supply Chain Science , 1967 .

[10]  Margaret M McMahon,et al.  Emergency: ED triage. , 2003, The American journal of nursing.

[11]  S B Quinn.  ED triage. , 1998, RN.

[12]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[13]  S. Walter,et al.  Reliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: interrater agreement. , 1999, Annals of emergency medicine.

[14]  K. Alagappan,et al.  Analysis and applicability of the Dutch EMS system into countries developing EMS systems. , 2006, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[15]  D. Holden,et al.  Adding value to the patient experience in emergency medicine: What features of the emergency department visit are most important to patients? , 1999 .

[16]  R. Salluzzo,et al.  Variables That Affect Patient Throughput Times in an Academic Emergency Department , 1997, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[17]  M. Cooke,et al.  Does the Manchester triage system detect the critically ill? , 1999, Journal of accident & emergency medicine.

[18]  K Mackway-Jones,et al.  Don’t throw triage out with the bathwater , 2003, Emergency medicine journal : EMJ.

[19]  T. Butterworth,et al.  Triage: a literature review 1985–19930 , 1995 .

[20]  D W Yates,et al.  Triage: a literature review 1985-1993. , 1995, Accident and emergency nursing.

[21]  Julie Considine,et al.  The Australasian Triage Scale: examining emergency department nurses' performance using computer and paper scenarios. , 2004, Annals of emergency medicine.

[22]  P G Zimmermann,et al.  The case for a universal, valid, reliable 5-tier triage acuity scale for US emergency departments. , 2001, Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association.

[23]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[24]  Mark Little,et al.  Inter‐rater reliability of the National Triage Scale over 11,500 simulated occasions of triage , 2009 .

[25]  黄亚明.  eMedicine , 2009 .

[26]  E. John Orav,et al.  Triage decisions for emergency department patients with chest pain , 1995, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[27]  A. Cumming,et al.  Changes in plasma calcium during septic shock. , 1994, Journal of accident & emergency medicine.

[28]  C J Holliman,et al.  International Emergency Medicine Reference List. , 1999, The Journal of emergency medicine.