Seismic safety assessment of a masonry building according to Italian Guidelines on Cultural Heritage: simplified mechanical-based approach and pushover analysis

The seismic safety assessment of a case study of a masonry building located in Naples (Italy) was performed together with a critical appraisal of the methods used. Being built before the introduction of proper seismic code provisions, this unreinforced masonry building could be representative of many other vulnerable historic buildings in earthquake-prone urban areas. First, a simplified model of the global seismic response was analyzed according to the LV1 assessment level provided by the Italian Guidelines on Cultural Heritage. The results obtained using old and updated versions of these guidelines were compared. A good agreement was revealed with reference to the detection of the weaker direction and the prevailing failure mechanism, but some differences were found about the calculation of the base shear capacity and the corresponding ground acceleration. Then, the achieved results were compared with those obtained using a more refined approach of nonlinear static analysis according to the LV3 assessment level. The results were reported in terms of damage and collapse mechanisms of masonry walls, pushover curves and seismic safety indexes. A further comparison was carried out between the model with flexible horizontal structures and that with the assumption of all the floor diaphragms as completely rigid. Although the two assessment methods LV1 and LV3 are not alternative to each other, since belonging to two different levels of evaluation, some critical issues were addressed in order to derive useful information on the reliability and the limits of validity of the simplified mechanical model, characterized by a force-based approach.

[1]  G. Magenes MASONRY BUILDING DESIGN IN SEISMIC AREAS: RECENT EXPERIENCES AND PROSPECTS FROM A EUROPEAN STANDPOINT , 2006 .

[2]  Serena Cattari,et al.  TREMURI program: An equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings , 2013 .

[3]  Dina D'Ayala,et al.  Definition of Collapse Mechanisms and Seismic Vulnerability of Historic Masonry Buildings , 2003 .

[4]  Guido Magenes,et al.  The Effect of Stiffened Floor and Roof Diaphragms on the Experimental Seismic Response of a Full-Scale Unreinforced Stone Masonry Building , 2014 .

[5]  24 .-Some Experimental Results on the Strength of Brick Masonry Walls , 2022 .

[6]  Anil K. Agrawal,et al.  Seismic performance of flexible timber diaphragms: Damping, force–displacement and natural period , 2015 .

[7]  Serena Cattari,et al.  PERPETUATE guidelines for seismic performance-based assessment of cultural heritage masonry structures , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[8]  C. Casapulla,et al.  Critical Response of Free-Standing Rocking Blocks to the Intense Phase of an Earthquake , 2017 .

[9]  Antonella Saisi,et al.  VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS OF THE HISTORICAL BUILDINGS IN SEISMIC AREA BY A MULTILEVEL APPROACH , 2006 .

[10]  Claudia Casapulla,et al.  On the Resonance Conditions of Rigid Rocking Blocks , 2015 .

[11]  Climent Molins,et al.  Strength Capacity of Masonry Wall Structures by the Equivalent Frame Method , 2005 .

[12]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Comparison between rocking analysis and kinematic analysis for the dynamic out‐of‐plane behavior of masonry walls , 2015 .

[13]  C. Casapulla,et al.  In-plane frictional resistances in dry block masonry walls and rocking-sliding failure modes revisited and experimentally validated , 2018 .

[14]  Mjn Priestley,et al.  Performance based seismic design , 2000 .

[15]  C. Casapulla,et al.  3D macro and micro-block models for limit analysis of out-of-plane loaded masonry walls with non-associative Coulomb friction , 2014 .

[16]  Linda Giresini,et al.  Rocking analysis of masonry walls interacting with roofs , 2016 .

[17]  V. Bosiljkov,et al.  STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOR FACTOR FOR MASONRY STRUCTURES , 2002 .

[18]  D. D’Ayala,et al.  Non linear push over assessment of heritage buildings in Istanbul to define seismic risk , 2012, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[19]  Antonio Borri,et al.  A method for the analysis and classification of historic masonry , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[20]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Rocking and Kinematic Approaches for Rigid Block Analysis of Masonry Walls: State of the Art and Recent Developments , 2017 .

[21]  A. Borri,et al.  "L'indice di qualità muraria(IQM):evoluzione ed applicazione nell'ambito delle Norme Tecniche per lae Costruzioni del 2008". , 2009 .

[22]  C. Casapulla,et al.  The comparative role of friction in local out-of-plane mechanisms of masonry buildings. Pushover analysis and experimental investigation , 2016 .

[23]  C. Casapulla,et al.  A simplified equation of motion for free rocking rigid blocks , 2016 .

[24]  Thomas N. Salonikios,et al.  Comparative inelastic pushover analysis of masonry frames , 2003 .

[25]  Linda Giresini,et al.  Horizontally restrained rocking blocks: evaluation of the role of boundary conditions with static and dynamic approaches , 2016, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[26]  S. Resemini,et al.  Mechanical models for the seismic vulnerability assessment of churches , .

[27]  Mauro Sassu The Reinforced Cut Wall (RCW): A Low-Cost Base Dissipator for Masonry Buildings , 2006 .

[28]  Sergio Lagomarsino,et al.  Seismic assessment of rocking masonry structures , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[29]  Linda Giresini,et al.  Energy-based method for identifying vulnerable macro-elements in historic masonry churches , 2016, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[30]  C. Casapulla,et al.  Free Damped Vibrations of Rocking Rigid Blocks as Uniformly Accelerated Motions , 2017 .

[31]  Antonella Saisi,et al.  KNOWLEDGE OF THE BUILDING, ON SITE INVESTIGATION AND CONNECTED PROBLEMS , 2009 .

[32]  B. Taranath Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings , 2004 .

[33]  Serena Cattari,et al.  In‐plane strength of unreinforced masonry piers , 2009 .

[34]  Linda Giresini,et al.  Structural Analysis and Consolidation Strategy of the Historic Mediceo Aqueduct in Pisa (Italy) , 2013 .

[35]  C. Casapulla Dry Rigid Block Masonry: Safe Solutions InPresence Of Coulomb Friction , 2001 .

[36]  P. Lourenço,et al.  Reducing the seismic vulnerability of cultural heritage buildings , 2006 .

[38]  Guido Magenes,et al.  EXISTING MASONRY BUILDINGS: GENERAL CODE ISSUES AND METHODS OF ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT , 2009 .