Analysis of the debonding of the stem–cement interface in intramedullary fixation using a non-linear fracture mechanics approach

Abstract Implant loosening is one of the most important cause of long-term failure of total hip replacements. Fatigue failure of the stem–cement interface and the bulk cement may cause aseptic loosening of the femoral stem. In this work, both mechanisms of failure were simulated using finite elements. The stem–cement interface failure was modelled by means of the cohesive surface theory that was implemented into a specific interface element, while damage accumulation and creep in bone cement were formulated through the theory of Continuum Damage Mechanics. Model parameters, such as, the mechanical characteristics of the interface, damage accumulation rules both for the cement and the interface, crack closure effect and friction evolution law, were determined to simulate the subsidence patterns of the stem in the cement mantle from experimental tests. A parametric analysis was also performed observing how each parameter of the model influences the micromotions and damage accumulation in the cement mantle. Results of this study support the importance of simulating the progressive debonding of the stem–cement interface on the prediction of long-term implant loosening.

[1]  A R Ingraffea,et al.  Mechanical characteristics of the stem‐cement interface , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  Joshua R. Smith,et al.  Universal binding energy curves for metals and bimetallic interfaces , 1981 .

[3]  O. Hoffman The Brittle Strength of Orthotropic Materials , 1967 .

[4]  W J Maloney,et al.  The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[5]  M H Stone,et al.  Some factors affecting the strength of the cement-metal interface. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  R C Johnston,et al.  The outcome of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement after a minimum twenty-year follow-up. The results of one surgeon. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  W H Harris,et al.  Tensile bonding strength of the cement-prosthesis interface. , 1994, Orthopedics.

[8]  M. Crisfield,et al.  Finite element interface models for the delamination analysis of laminated composites: mechanical and computational issues , 2001 .

[9]  N Verdonschot,et al.  The effects of cement-stem debonding in THA on the long-term failure probability of cement. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Dennis K Collis,et al.  Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Rough and Polished Cemented Stems with Essentially the Same Geometry , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  W. Maloney,et al.  Autopsy studies of the bone-cement interface in well-fixed cemented total hip arthroplasties. , 1993, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  W H Harris,et al.  Is It Advantageous to Strengthen the Cement‐Metal Interface and Use a Collar for Cemented Femoral Components of Total Hip Replacements? , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  J. C. Simo,et al.  Strain- and stress-based continuum damage models—I. Formulation , 1987 .

[14]  N. Nuño,et al.  Residual stresses at the stem-cement interface of an idealized cemented hip stem. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  J. Galante,et al.  Wear Debris in Total Joint Replacements , 1994, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[16]  P. Prendergast,et al.  Residual stress due to curing can initiate damage in porous bone cement: experimental and theoretical evidence. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  G. Marshall,et al.  Factors affecting surgical alloy/bone cement interface adhesion. , 1980, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[18]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Migration, Stem Shape, and Surface Finish in Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Hip-joint and abductor-muscle forces adequately represent in vivo loading of a cemented total hip reconstruction. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Fornasier Vl,et al.  The femoral stem/cement interface in total hip replacement. , 1976 .

[21]  P. Colombi,et al.  Fatigue analysis of cemented hip prosthesis: damage accumulation scenario and sensitivity analysis , 2002 .

[22]  W H Harris,et al.  In vitro evaluation of bonding of the cement‐metal interface of a total hip femoral component using ultrasound , 1995, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[23]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Cement Debonding Process of Total Hip Arthroplasty Stems , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  T P Harrigan,et al.  A finite element study of the initiation of failure of fixation in cemented femoral total hip components , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[25]  T. Schmalzried,et al.  The significance of stem-cement loosening of grit-blasted femoral components. , 2000, Orthopedics.

[26]  L. Margolin A generalized Griffith criterion for crack propagation , 1984 .

[27]  R. Rose,et al.  On the stability of the mechanical properties of self-curing acrylic bone cement. , 1974, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  John R. Smith,et al.  Universal features of bonding in metals , 1983 .

[29]  W. Hozack,et al.  Failure of the cement-bone interface. A consequence of strengthening the cement-prosthesis interface? , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[30]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Evaluation of cement stresses in finite element analyses of cemented orthopaedic implants. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[31]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Creep behavior of hand-mixed Simplex P bone cement under cyclic tensile loading. , 1994, Journal of applied biomaterials : an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials.

[32]  N. Rushton Implant wear: the future of total joint replacement.: Edited by Timothy Wright and Stuart B. Goodman. Pp 150. Rosemont, Illinois: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 1996. ISBN: 0-89203-207-3. US$79.95. , 1999 .

[33]  T P Harrigan,et al.  A three-dimensional non-linear finite element study of the effect of cement-prosthesis debonding in cemented femoral total hip components. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Surface roughness of debonded straight-tapered stems in cemented THA reduces subsidence but not cement damage. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[35]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Effects of prosthesis surface roughness on the failure process of cemented hip implants after stem-cement debonding. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[36]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Dynamic creep behavior of acrylic bone cement. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[37]  T. Bauer,et al.  The pathology of total joint arthroplasty. I. Mechanisms of implant fixation. , 1999, Skeletal radiology.

[38]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Subsidence of THA stems due to acrylic cement creep is extremely sensitive to interface friction. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[39]  C. Howie,et al.  Localised endosteal bone lysis in relation to the femoral components of cemented total hip arthroplasties. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[40]  I. E. Ruyter,et al.  Creep studies of multiphase acrylic systems. , 1989, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[41]  J. Callaghan,et al.  Early loosening of the femoral component at the cement-prosthesis interface after total hip replacement. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[42]  Jean Lemaitre,et al.  A Course on Damage Mechanics , 1992 .

[43]  I. Heger,et al.  The mechanism of loosening in cemented hip prostheses determined from long-term results , 2004, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[44]  I A Stokes,et al.  Quantitative anatomy of the lumbar musculature. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[45]  W H Harris,et al.  Comparison of the fatigue characteristics of centrifuged and uncentrifuged simplex P bone cement , 1987, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[46]  L Ryd,et al.  Wear particle diffusion and tissue differentiation in TKA implant fibrous interfaces. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[47]  H. Amstutz,et al.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. , 1979, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[48]  D J Chwirut,et al.  Long-term compressive creep deformation and damage in acrylic bone cements. , 1984, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[49]  A. M. Ahmed,et al.  Metal/cement interface strength in cemented stem fixation , 1984, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[50]  W. Harris Long Term Results of Cemented Femoral Stems With Roughened Precoated Surfaces , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[51]  P J Prendergast,et al.  The relationship between stress, porosity, and nonlinear damage accumulation in acrylic bone cement. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[52]  W. Harris,et al.  Acrylic Fragmentation in Total Hip Replacements and Its Biological Consequences , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[53]  A. M. Ahmed,et al.  The quasistatic and fatigue performance of the implant/bone-cement interface. , 1981, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[54]  J. Hutchinson,et al.  The influence of plasticity on mixed mode interface toughness , 1993 .

[55]  J. Dienes Comments on “a generalized griffith criterion for crack propagation” by L. G. Margolin , 1986 .

[56]  J. G. Pinto,et al.  Fatigue Model to Characterize Cement‐Metal Interface in Dynamic Shear , 1998, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

[57]  R D Crowninshield,et al.  Cemented Femoral Component Surface Finish Mechanics , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[58]  M. Ortiz,et al.  Computational modelling of impact damage in brittle materials , 1996 .

[59]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Finite element simulation of anisotropic damage accumulation and creep in acrylic bone cement , 2004 .

[60]  F. Armero,et al.  Large‐scale modeling of localized dissipative mechanisms in a local continuum: applications to the numerical simulation of strain localization in rate‐dependent inelastic solids , 1999 .

[61]  H. Mckellop,et al.  Effects of cement creep on stem subsidence and stresses in the cement mantle of a total hip replacement. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[62]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Mechanical effects of stem cement interface characteristics in total hip replacement. , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[63]  J. B. Park,et al.  Pre-coated orthopedic implants with bone cement. , 1979, Biomaterials, medical devices, and artificial organs.

[64]  J. Fisher,et al.  Cement particles containing radio-opacifiers stimulate pro-osteolytic cytokine production from a human monocytic cell line. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[65]  John W. Hutchinson,et al.  Interface strength, work of adhesion and plasticity in the peel test , 1998 .

[66]  D L Bartel,et al.  Coulomb frictional interfaces in modeling cemented total hip replacements: a more realistic model. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[67]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Measurement of non-linear microcrack accumulation rates in polymethylmethacrylate bone cement under cyclic loading , 1999, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[68]  R. Spilker,et al.  Mixed and Penalty Finite Element Models for the Nonlinear Behavior of Biphasic Soft Tissues in Finite Deformation: Part I - Alternate Formulations. , 1997, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.