Transitions of Innovation Activities in Latecomer Countries: An Exploratory Case Study of South Korea

The main aim of this study is to explore the diverse route of innovation activities and key characteristics during the transition period of the emerging economies using the analytical framework of innovation system and product life cycle. Study distinguishes three archetypes of innovation activities: deepening of the process, architectural, and radical innovations. Study also argues that each route of innovation activities in the transition period of the emerging economies requires corresponding institutional frameworks, different base of capabilities, and different relationships among innovation actors to facilitate the transition from imitator to innovator. Finally, some policy implications of this attribute are considered.

[1]  Keun Lee,et al.  Technological Regimes, Catching-Up and Leapfrogging: Findings from the Korean Industries , 2001 .

[2]  D. Ernst,et al.  Global Production Networks, Knowledge Diffusion and Local Capability Formation , 2002 .

[3]  G. Dutrénit.  The transition from building‐up innovative technological capabilities to leadership by latecomer firms , 2007 .

[4]  Takahiro Fujimoto,et al.  Architecture-Based Comparative Advantage — A Design Information View of Manufacturing , 2007 .

[5]  Gabriela Dutrénit,et al.  Building Technological Capabilities in Latecomer Firms: A Review Essay , 2004 .

[6]  Yahong Li.  From imitation to innovation , 2007 .

[7]  B. Amable.  The Diversity Of Modern Capitalism , 2003 .

[8]  John Bessant,et al.  Approaching the innovation frontier in Korea: the transition phase to leadership , 2004 .

[9]  S. Lemon,et al.  IMPLICATIONS FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES , 2004 .

[10]  Byung-Yeon Kim,et al.  Both Institutions and Policies Matter but Differently for Different Income Groups of Countries: Determinants of Long-Run Economic Growth Revisited , 2009 .

[11]  M. Hobday,et al.  Local ‘Test Bed’ Market Demand in the Transition to Leadership: The Case of the Korean Mobile Handset Industry , 2011 .

[12]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[13]  Luc Soete,et al.  Catching up in technology: entry barriers and windows of opportunity , 1988 .

[14]  Fulvio Castellacci,et al.  Closing the Technology Gap? , 2011 .

[15]  H. Hwang,et al.  The technological innovation patterns of component suppliers in the post catching-up period : The case study of component suppliers in mobile phone industry , 2006 .

[16]  Youngrak Choi.  Dynamic Techno-Management Capability: The Case of Samsung Semiconductor Sector in Korea , 1996 .

[17]  Fulvio Castellacci,et al.  The dynamics of national innovation systems: A panel cointegration analysis of the coevolution between innovative capability and absorptive capacity , 2013 .

[18]  Sanjaya Lall,et al.  Technological Change and Industrialization in the Asian Newly Industrializing Economies: Achievements and Challenges , 2001 .

[19]  Keun Lee,et al.  Emerging digital technology as a window of opportunity and technological leapfrogging: catch-up in digital TV by the Korean firms , 2005, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[20]  Carl J. Dahlman,et al.  Managing technological development : lessons from the newly industrializing countries , 1987 .

[21]  P. Hall,et al.  Varieties of Capitalism , 2001 .

[22]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Competitiveness of Nations: Why Some Countries Prosper While Others Fall Behind , 2007 .

[23]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[24]  Alexandra Waluszewski,et al.  Managing Technological Development , 2002 .

[25]  Linsu Kim,et al.  Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning , 1997 .

[26]  Dieter Ernst,et al.  Global production networks and the changing geography of innovation systems. Implications for developing countries , 2002 .

[27]  M. Bell,et al.  Technological Accumulation and Industrial Growth: Contrasts Between Developed and Developing Countries , 1993 .

[28]  Michael Hobday,et al.  Innovation in East Asia: The Challenge to Japan , 1996, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[29]  J. Mathews,et al.  Enhancing the Role of Universities in Building National Innovative Capacity in Asia: The Case of Taiwan , 2007 .

[30]  Jae-Yong Choung,et al.  Role of formal standards in transition to the technology frontier: Korean ICT systems , 2011 .

[31]  F. List.  The National System of Political Economy , 1990 .

[32]  John A. Mathews,et al.  Competitive Advantages of the Latecomer Firm: A Resource-Based Account of Industrial Catch-Up Strategies , 2002 .

[33]  S. Lall.  Technological capabilities and industrialization , 1992 .

[34]  Myung-Hwan Rim,et al.  Transition of Latecomer Firms from Technology Users to Technology Generators: Korean Semiconductor Firms , 2000 .