论文信息 - BDI and BOID Argumentation

BDI and BOID Argumentation

In this discussion paper we are interested in the role of argumentation in the context of cognitive BDI and BOID agents, i.e., agents whose deliberation is based on beliefs, obligations, intentions and desires. We discuss argumentation issues for single agent deliberation, multiagent dialogues, and interaction between agents and their normative system. For each category we discuss examples and we give a personal view on their formalization.

Guido Boella | Leendert van der Torre

[1] Peter McBurney,et al. Games That Agents Play: A Formal Framework for Dialogues between Autonomous Agents , 2002, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[2] Nicholas R. Jennings,et al. Agents That Reason and Negotiate by Arguing , 1998, J. Log. Comput..

[3] Guido Boella,et al. Attributing mental attitudes to normative systems , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[4] Richmond H. Thomason,et al. Desires and Defaults: A Framework for Planning with Inferred Goals , 2000, KR.

[5] Mehdi Dastani,et al. Goal generation in the BOID architecture , 2002 .

[6] Guido Boella,et al. Permissions and obligations in hierarchical normative systems , 2003, ICAIL.

[7] Henry Prakken,et al. A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning , 1996, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[8] Mehdi Dastani,et al. Realistic desires , 2002, J. Appl. Non Class. Logics.

[9] Leila Amgoud,et al. A Formal Framework for Handling Conflicting Desires , 2003, ECSQARU.

[10] Guido Boella,et al. Rational norm creation: attributing mental attitudes to normative systems, part 2 , 2003, ICAIL.

[11] Leon van der Torre,et al. Input/Output Logics , 2000, J. Philos. Log..

[12] Simon Parsons,et al. Modelling dialogues using argumentation , 2000, Proceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems.

[13] Mehdi Dastani,et al. What is a Normative Goal ? , 2002 .

[14] Simon Parsons,et al. Arguments, Dialogue, and Negotiation , 2000, ECAI.