Prostate cancer detection at early stage is very critical for desirable treatment outcome. In fact prostate cancer can be cured, if it is detected at early stage. Among imaging modalities used for cancer assessment, ultrasound elastography is emerging as an effective clinical tool for prostate and breast cancer diagnosis. Current clinical ultrasound elastography systems utilize strain imaging where tissue strain images are generated to approximate the tissue elastic modulus distribution. While strain images can be generated in real-time fashion, they lack the accuracy necessary for having high sensitivity and specificity. To improve strain imaging, researchers have developed full inversion based elastography techniques. These techniques are not based on simplifying assumptions such as tissue stress uniformity leading to accurate elastic modulus reconstruction. The drawback of these techniques, however, is that they are computationally intensive, hence are not suitable for real-time imaging. Among these techniques, a constrained elastography technique was developed which showed promising results as long as the tumor geometry can be obtained accurately from the imaging modality used in conjunction with elastography. This requirement is not easy to fulfill, especially with ultrasound imaging. To address this issue, we present an unconstrained full inversion ultrasound elastography method for prostate cancer imaging where knowledge of tissue geometry is not necessary. Tissue elastic modulus reconstruction in the proposed elastography technique is iterative, where each iteration involves tissue stress computation using Finite Element Method (FEM) followed by Young’s modulus updating using Hooke’s law. The method was validated using in silico and tissue mimicking prostate phantom studies. Results obtained from these studies indicate that the technique is reasonably accurate and robust.
[1]
N. Miyanaga,et al.
Tissue elasticity imaging for diagnosis of prostate cancer: A preliminary report
,
2005,
International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.
[2]
Abbas Samani,et al.
Detecting Mechanical Abnormalities in Prostate Tissue Using FE-Based Image Registration
,
2007,
MICCAI.
[3]
T. Krouskop,et al.
Elastic Moduli of Breast and Prostate Tissues under Compression
,
1998,
Ultrasonic imaging.
[4]
E. Messing,et al.
Quantitative characterization of viscoelastic properties of human prostate correlated with histology.
,
2008,
Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[5]
G. Bartsch,et al.
Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and elastography in imaging of prostate cancer
,
2007,
Current opinion in urology.
[6]
T. Schlomm,et al.
Evaluation of prostate cancer detection with ultrasound real-time elastography: a comparison with step section pathological analysis after radical prostatectomy.
,
2008,
European urology.
[7]
Jie Tang,et al.
The contribution of strain patterns in characterization of prostate peripheral zone lesions at transrectal ultrasonography
,
2012,
Acta radiologica.
[8]
Jonathan Ophir,et al.
Visualisation of HIFU lesions using elastography of the human prostate in vivo: preliminary results.
,
2003,
Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[9]
Jonathan Bishop,et al.
A constrained modulus reconstruction technique for breast cancer assessment
,
2001,
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.