Disruptions to human speed perception induced by motion adaptation and transcranial magnetic stimulation

To investigate the underlying nature of the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on speed perception, we applied repetitive TMS (rTMS) to human V5/MT+ following adaptation to either fast‐ (20 deg/s) or slow (4 deg/s)‐moving grating stimuli. The adapting stimuli induced changes in the perceived speed of a standard reference stimulus moving at 10 deg/s. In the absence of rTMS, adaptation to the slower stimulus led to an increase in perceived speed of the reference, whilst adaptation to the faster stimulus produced a reduction in perceived speed. These induced changes in speed perception can be modelled by a ratio‐taking operation of the outputs of two temporally tuned mechanisms that decay exponentially over time. When rTMS was applied to V5/MT+ following adaptation, the perceived speed of the reference stimulus was reduced, irrespective of whether adaptation had been to the faster‐ or slower‐moving stimulus. The fact that rTMS after adaptation always reduces perceived speed, independent of which temporal mechanism has undergone adaptation, suggests that rTMS does not selectively facilitate activity of adapted neurons but instead leads to suppression of neural function. The results highlight the fact that potentially different effects are generated by TMS on adapted neuronal populations depending upon whether or not they are responding to visual stimuli.

[1]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Slow and fast visual motion channels have independent binocular–rivalry stages , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Alexander Thiele,et al.  A model of speed tuning in MT neurons , 2002, Vision Research.

[4]  P. Thompson,et al.  Human speed perception is contrast dependent , 1992, Vision Research.

[5]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  The Functional Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Signal Suppression or Neural Noise Generation? , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  J. Zacks Neuroimaging Studies of Mental Rotation: A Meta-analysis and Review , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Opposite impact on 14C-2-deoxyglucose brain metabolism following patterns of high and low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the posterior parietal cortex , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  M. Hallett Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain , 2000, Nature.

[9]  A. Cowey,et al.  Neural activation state determines behavioral susceptibility to modified theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[10]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Neural adaptation reveals state‐dependent effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[11]  A. Cowey,et al.  Motion perception and perceptual learning studied by magnetic stimulation. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[12]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for sustained and transient detectors in human vision , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Motion adaptation in area MT. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Hartwig R. Siebner,et al.  BOLD MRI responses to repetitive TMS over human dorsal premotor cortex , 2005, NeuroImage.

[15]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Theta Burst Stimulation of the Human Motor Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[16]  D. Burr,et al.  Spatial and temporal selectivity of the human motion detection system , 1985, Vision Research.

[17]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Facilitation of muscle evoked responses after repetitive cortical stimulation in man , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Chara Vakrou,et al.  Induced Deficits in Speed Perception by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Human Cortical Areas V5/MT+ and V3A , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Frequency specific changes in regional cerebral blood flow and motor system connectivity following rTMS to the primary motor cortex , 2005, NeuroImage.

[20]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Antagonistic comparison of temporal frequency filter outputs as a basis for speed perception , 1994, Vision Research.

[21]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Baseline cortical excitability determines whether TMS disrupts or facilitates behavior. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Are the after-effects of low-frequency rTMS on motor cortex excitability due to changes in the efficacy of cortical synapses? , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  Stephen T. Hammett,et al.  Speed can go up as well as down at low contrast: Implications for models of motion perception , 2006, Vision Research.

[24]  Peter Thompson,et al.  Velocity after-effects: The effects of adaptation to moving stimuli on the perception of subsequently seen moving stimuli , 1981, Vision Research.

[25]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive neuroscience , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Speed-Dependent Responses in V5: A Replication Study , 1999, NeuroImage.

[27]  Jeannette A M Lorteije,et al.  Disentangling neural structures for processing of high‐ and low‐speed visual motion , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[28]  Klaus Funke,et al.  Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on single‐unit activity in the cat primary visual cortex , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  W. Newsome,et al.  A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT) , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[30]  Neil G. Muggleton,et al.  Testing the validity of the TMS state-dependency approach: Targeting functionally distinct motion-selective neural populations in visual areas V1/V2 and V5/MT+ , 2008, NeuroImage.

[31]  J. Silvanto,et al.  A novel approach for enhancing the functional specificity of TMS: Revealing the properties of distinct neural populations within the stimulated region , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[32]  H. Komatsu,et al.  Modulation of pursuit eye movements by stimulation of cortical areas MT and MST. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Speed-Dependent Motion-Sensitive Responses in V5: An fMRI Study , 1998, NeuroImage.

[34]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of human area MT/V5 disrupts perception and storage of the motion aftereffect , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  Alan Cowey,et al.  The Ferrier Lecture 2004 What can transcranial magnetic stimulation tell us about how the brain works? , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  The temporal characteristics of motion processing in hMT/V5+: Combining fMRI and neuronavigated TMS , 2006, NeuroImage.

[37]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Time course of the state-dependent effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the TMS-adaptation paradigm , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[38]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  Estimating Target Speed from the Population Response in Visual Area MT , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  U. Eysel,et al.  Paired‐pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol applied to visual cortex of anaesthetized cat: effects on visually evoked single‐unit activity , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  H. Siebner,et al.  Long-lasting increase in corticospinal excitability after 1800 pulses of subthreshold 5 Hz repetitive TMS to the primary motor cortex , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[41]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  Comparison of the spatial limits on direction selectivity in visual areas MT and V1. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  A new transparent motion aftereffect , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  Brian N. Pasley,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Elicits Coupled Neural and Hemodynamic Consequences , 2007, Science.

[44]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Impact of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the parietal cortex on metabolic brain activity: a 14C-2DG tracing study in the cat , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[45]  Alexander Thiele,et al.  Speed skills: measuring the visual speed analyzing properties of primate MT neurons , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  Rebecca A. Champion,et al.  A ratio model of perceived speed in the human visual system , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[47]  John A Perrone,et al.  Economy of scale: a motion sensor with variable speed tuning. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[48]  W. Newsome,et al.  Correlation between Speed Perception and Neural Activity in the Middle Temporal Visual Area , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Bart Krekelberg,et al.  Interactions between Speed and Contrast Tuning in the Middle Temporal Area: Implications for the Neural Code for Speed , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Speed-dependent motion sensitive responses in V5: an fMRI study , 1998, NeuroImage.

[51]  Bart Krekelberg,et al.  Adaptation in macaque MT reduces perceived speed and improves speed discrimination. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  M. Hallett,et al.  Depression of motor cortex excitability by low‐frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1997, Neurology.

[53]  B. Wandell,et al.  Specializations for Chromatic and Temporal Signals in Human Visual Cortex , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  E. Wassermann Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[55]  V. Walsh,et al.  State-dependency in brain stimulation studies of perception and cognition , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[56]  W. Newsome,et al.  Motion selectivity in macaque visual cortex. II. Spatiotemporal range of directional interactions in MT and V1. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[57]  G. Orban,et al.  Lesions of the Superior Temporal Cortical Motion Areas Impair Speed Discrimination in the Macaque Monkey , 1995, The European journal of neuroscience.

[58]  Bruce Luber,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation differentially affects speed and direction judgments , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[59]  Michael Bach,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for independent speed channels in human motion processing. , 2004, Journal of vision.