GAUSSIAN FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR THE EVALUATION OF BENEFIT, COST, AND RISK ANALYSIS IN THE INDONESIAN OIL AND GAS PROCESSING AREA

In the oil and gas processing area, adequate risk control should be prearranged to prevent serious accidents, such as major gas leak, fire, and explosion. Installing gas detectors at appropriate technology is one of indispensable conditions for an implementation of risk reduction measures. Open-path infrared and ultrasonic leak gas detector provide wide coverage of gas detection. This capability is advantageous to detect unintentionally gas release in wide coverage and windy-climate processing area. On the other hand, the installation and maintenance cost of those gas detectors are relatively high compared to point infrared and catalytic gas detector. Gaussian fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (Gaussian FAHP) is implemented to evaluate the selection of gas detector technology in terms of benefit, cost and risk criteria. Ten expert panelists from production, safety, and maintenance departments are involved in Delphi Technique to assess the sub-criteria of Gaussian FAHP. The Gaussian FAHP evaluation reveals that point infrared gas detector has the highest value among all gas detector technologies. This means that point infrared technology acquires efficient value in delivering service to process safety operation. The obtained result of consistency ratio is always below 0.1 (CR<0.1). By these terms, the Gaussian FAHP is consistent and applicable. By changing 50% amount of weight in all sub-criteria, there is no alternatives rank position change. The sensitivity analysis proves that the Gaussian FAHP evaluation in the research is consistent irrespectively of the sub-criteria change. The integration of Delphi Technique and Gaussian FAHP in the research is the scientific work to evaluate the best applied detector technology in the oil and gas processing area.

[1]  Bing Chen,et al.  A hybrid fuzzy stochastic analytical hierarchy process (FSAHP) approach for evaluating ballast water treatment technologies , 2013, Environmental Systems Research.

[2]  A. Shapiro,et al.  Fuzzy logic modifications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2017 .

[3]  Hesham A. Hefny,et al.  Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for different scenarios of electrical power generation in Egypt , 2013 .

[4]  Sean W Legg,et al.  STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING APPROACHES FOR THE PLACEMENT OF GAS DETECTORS IN PROCESS FACILITIES , 2013 .

[5]  Xiaoguang Ouyang,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy analytical hierarchical processes for selecting the paradigms of mangroves in municipal wastewater treatment. , 2017, Chemosphere.

[6]  O. Moselhi,et al.  Prioritizing deterioration factors of water pipelines using Delphi method , 2016 .

[7]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications - Two decades review from 1994 to 2014 , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  Edward Naranjo,et al.  Early detection of combustible gas leaks using open path infrared (IR) gas detectors , 2012, Other Conferences.

[9]  Mei Qiu,et al.  Assessment of Water Inrush Risk Using the Fuzzy Delphi Analytic Hierarchy Process and Grey Relational Analysis in the Liangzhuang Coal Mine, China , 2017, Mine Water and the Environment.

[10]  Tsz Leung Yip,et al.  Shipping technology selection for dynamic capability based on improved Gaussian fuzzy AHP model , 2017 .

[11]  N. Black,et al.  Consensus Development Methods: A Review of Best Practice in Creating Clinical Guidelines , 1999, Journal of health services research & policy.

[12]  İhsan Kaya,et al.  A comprehensive review of fuzzy multi criteria decision making methodologies for energy policy making , 2019, Energy Strategy Reviews.

[13]  Ultrasonic devices improve gas leak detection in challenging environments , .

[14]  Zhe Tian,et al.  Application of a trapezoidal fuzzy AHP method for work safety evaluation and early warning rating of hot and humid environments , 2012 .

[15]  Mohammad Ataei,et al.  Ranking the sawability of ornamental stone using Fuzzy Delphi and multi-criteria decision-making techniques , 2013 .

[16]  H. Pasman Loss prevention in the process industries , 2002 .

[17]  I-Shuo Chen,et al.  Exploring the critical influential factors of creativity for college students: A multiple criteria decision-making approach , 2014 .

[18]  Carl D. Laird,et al.  Optimal gas detector placement under uncertainty considering Conditional-Value-at-Risk , 2013 .

[19]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[20]  H. Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications , 1993 .

[21]  N. Dalkey,et al.  An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts , 1963 .

[22]  Kaveh Khalili Damghani,et al.  Application of a fuzzy TOPSIS method base on modified preference ratio and fuzzy distance measurement in assessment of traffic police centers performance , 2010, Appl. Soft Comput..

[23]  Piero Risoluti Fuzzy Sets, Decision Making, and Expert Systems , 2004 .

[24]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory , 1983 .

[25]  Kèyù Zhü,et al.  Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: Fallacy of the popular methods , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Pornwasin Sirisawat,et al.  Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approaches to prioritizing solutions for reverse logistics barriers , 2018, Comput. Ind. Eng..