Performance of serial acquirers: toward an acquisition program perspective

Based on an analysis of the most active acquirers in seven industry sectors in the United States in the 1990s, we find that both a high rate of acquisitions and a high variability of the rate are negatively related to performance. An acquirer's size, the scope of its acquisition program, and acquisition experience moderate the relationship by weakening the negative effects. Our findings contribute to an improved understanding of acquisition capabilities and program‐level acquisition performance, thereby adding to an emerging stream of research that is building an acquisition program perspective. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[2]  Jeffry Netter,et al.  What do returns to acquiring firms tell us? Evidence from firms that make many acquisitions , 2002 .

[3]  Stephen Brown.  Marketing to Generation , 2003 .

[4]  H. Barkema,et al.  Pace, rhythm and scope: Process dependence in building a profitable multinational corporation , 2002 .

[5]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance , 1986 .

[6]  Deepak K. Datta.  Organizational fit and acquisition performance: Effects of post-acquisition integration , 1991 .

[7]  René M. Stulz,et al.  Firm size and the gains from acquisitions , 2004 .

[8]  Anand M. Vijh,et al.  Do Long‐Term Shareholders Benefit From Corporate Acquisitions? , 1997 .

[9]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[10]  Saeyoung Chang,et al.  Takeovers of Privately Held Targets, Methods of Payment, and Bidder Returns , 1998 .

[11]  Rex Thompson,et al.  Evidence on the capitalized value of merger activity for acquiring firms , 1983 .

[12]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Alliance capability, stock market response, and long‐term alliance success: the role of the alliance function , 2002 .

[13]  Mathew L. A. Hayward.  When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990 to 1995 , 2002 .

[14]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[15]  Mathew L. A. Hayward.  Professional influence: The effects of investment banks on clients acquisition financing and performance , 2003 .

[16]  M. Lubatkin.  Mergers and the Performance of the Acquiring Firm. , 1983 .

[17]  E. Fama,et al.  Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies , 1996 .

[18]  Alberto Torres,et al.  Learning from High-Tech Deals , 2002 .

[19]  K. Fowler,et al.  Determinants of tender offer post-acquisition financial performance , 1989 .

[20]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  Mergers, sell-offs, and economic efficiency , 1987 .

[21]  D. P. Baron,et al.  Tender Offers and Management Resistance , 1983 .

[22]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: post‐acquisition strategies and integration capability in U.S. bank mergers , 2004 .

[23]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[24]  Kevin J. Murphy,et al.  Glamour, value and the post-acquisition performance of acquiring firms 1 We would like to thank Euge , 1998 .

[25]  J. Myles Shaver,et al.  A Paradox of Synergy: Contagion and Capacity Effects in Mergers and Acquisitions , 2006 .

[26]  Sydney Finkelstein,et al.  Understanding Acquisition Performance: The Role of Transfer Effects , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[27]  J. B. Kusewitt.  An exploratory study of strategic acquisition factors relating to performance , 1985 .

[28]  Terry L. Amburgey,et al.  Strategic momentum: The effects of repetitive, positional, and contextual momentum on merger activity , 1992 .

[29]  S. Finkelstein,et al.  The Influence of Organizational Acquisition Experience on Acquisition Performance: A Behavioral Learning Perspective , 1999 .

[30]  FinkelsteinSydney,et al.  Understanding Acquisition Performance , 2002 .