Sexual interference of the floral kind

Floral hermaphroditism results in conflicts and compromise in the parental roles of plants during pollination and mating. A potential cost of hermaphroditism is sexual interference between maternal and paternal functions resulting in gamete wastage and reduced fitness. Sexual interference may or may not be associated with self-pollination. In cases where self-pollination occurs, ovule or pollen discounting may reduce mating opportunities. Here I describe forms of sexual interference in flowering plants, distinguishing whether physical or biochemical interactions are involved and whether fitness costs associated with gamete wastage arise from intra-floral versus inter-floral processes. I review the limited experimental evidence for interference between sex functions and evaluate the hypothesis that some floral adaptations usually interpreted as anti-selfing mechanisms may serve an alternative function in reducing mating costs arising from this form of sexual conflict.

[1]  R. Bertin,et al.  POLLEN INTERFERENCE AND CRYPTIC SELF‐FERTILITY IN CAMPSIS RADICANS , 1988 .

[2]  L. Harder,et al.  Pollen Dispersal and Mating Patterns in Animal-Pollinated Plants , 1996 .

[3]  Steven R. Seavey,et al.  Self‐sterility in Epilobium obcordatum (Onagraceae) , 1994 .

[4]  J. Thompson,et al.  Evolution and maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism in Narcissus. II. Fitness comparisons between style morphs , 2000, Heredity.

[5]  S. Barrett,et al.  Effects of prior self-pollination on outcrossed seed set in tristylous Pontederia sagittata (Pontederiaceae) , 1994, Sexual Plant Reproduction.

[6]  S. Barrett,et al.  Floral manipulations reveal the cause of male fitness variation in experimental populations of Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae) , 1992 .

[7]  S. Barrett,et al.  Enantiostyly in Wachendorfia (Haemodoraceae): the influence of reproductive systems on the maintenance of the polymorphism. , 2002, American journal of botany.

[8]  L. Harder,et al.  Mating cost of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants , 1995, Nature.

[9]  L. F. Galloway,et al.  COSTS OF SELF‐POLLINATION IN A SELF‐INCOMPATIBLE PLANT, POLEMONIUM VISCOSUM , 1989 .

[10]  W. Kress,et al.  Pollination: Flexible style that encourages outcrossing , 2001, Nature.

[11]  S. Barrett,et al.  Differential ovule development following self- and cross-pollination: the basis of self-sterility in Narcissus triandrus (Amaryllidaceae). , 1999, American journal of botany.

[12]  P. Yeo SOME ASPECTS OF HETEROSTYLY , 1975 .

[13]  S. Barrett,et al.  ON THE DARWINIAN HYPOTHESIS OF THE ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF TRISTYLY , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  S. Barrett Evolution and Function of Heterostyly , 1992, Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[15]  Charles Darwin,et al.  The Effects of Cross and Self Fertilisation in the Vegetable Kingdom , 1972 .

[16]  R. Wyatt,et al.  The consequences of self-pollination in Asclepias exaltata, a self-incompatible milkweed , 1993 .

[17]  S. Barrett,et al.  The effect of pollination intensity and incompatible pollen on seed set in Turnera ulmifolia (Turneraceae) , 1984 .

[18]  D. G. Lloyd,et al.  Stylar Polymorphisms and the Evolution of Heterostyly in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae) , 1996 .

[19]  R. Bertin INCIDENCE OF MONOECY AND DICHOGAMY IN RELATION TO SELF-FERTILIZATION IN ANGIOSPERMS. , 1993, American journal of botany.

[20]  R. Dulberger Floral Polymorphisms and Their Functional Significance in the Heterostylous Syndrome , 1992 .

[21]  D. G. Lloyd,et al.  Reproductive biology of a primitive angiosperm,Pseudowintera colorata (Winteraceae), and the evolution of pollination systems in theAnthophyta , 1992, Plant Systematics and Evolution.

[22]  E. Charnov,et al.  Why be an hermaphrodite? , 1976, Nature.

[23]  J. E. Todd On the Flowers of Solanum Rostratum and Cassia Chamaecrista , 1882, The American Naturalist.

[24]  J. Thompson,et al.  Evolution and maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism in Narcissus. I. Floral variation and style-morph ratios , 2000, Heredity.

[25]  L. Harder,et al.  The mating consequences of sexual segregation within inflorescences of flowering plants , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Sexual polymorphisms in Narcissus triandrus (Amaryllidaceae): is this species tristylous? , 1997, Heredity.

[27]  L. Harder,et al.  A Clarification of Pollen Discounting and Its Joint Effects with Inbreeding Depression on Mating System Evolution , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[28]  Deborah Charlesworth,et al.  INBREEDING DEPRESSION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES , 1987 .

[29]  S. Barrett,et al.  The Evolution and Function of Stylar Polymorphisms in Flowering Plants , 2000 .

[30]  D. G. Lloyd,et al.  The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms I. Dichogamy , 1986 .

[31]  D. G. Lloyd,et al.  INTRASEXUAL SELECTION AND THE SEGREGATION OF POLLEN AND STIGMAS IN HERMAPHRODITE PLANTS, EXEMPLIFIED BY WAHLENBERGIA ALBOMARGINATA (CAMPANULACEAE) , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  Zhangling,et al.  Study on the flexistyly pollination mechanism in Alpinia plants (Zingiberaceae) , 2001 .

[33]  A. Fetscher Resolution of male-female conflict in an hermaphroditic flower , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  M. V. Price,et al.  Reproductive costs of self-pollination in Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae) : are ovules usurped ? , 1991 .