Time- and size-resolved chemical composition of submicron particles in Pittsburgh: Implications for aerosol sources and processes

[1] An Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) was deployed at the Pittsburgh Environmental Protection Agency Supersite from 7 to 22 September 2002 as part of the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study (PAQS). The main objectives of this deployment were to characterize the concentrations, size distributions, and temporal variations of nonrefractory (NR) chemical species in submicron particles (approximately PM1) and to further develop and evaluate the AMS. Reasonably good agreement was observed on particle concentrations, composition, and size distributions between the AMS data and measurements from collocated instruments (given the difference between the PM1 and PM2.5 size cuts), including TEOM, semicontinuous sulfate, 2-hour- and 24-hour-averaged organic carbon, SMPS, 4-hour-averaged ammonium, and micro-orifice uniform deposit impactor. Total NR-PM1 mass concentration in Pittsburgh accumulates over periods of several days punctuated with rapid cleaning due to rain or air mass changes. Sulfate and organics are the major NR-PM1 components while the concentrations of nitrate and chloride are generally low. Significant amounts of ammonium, which most of the time are consistent with sulfate present as ammonium sulfate, are also present in particles. However, there are periods when the aerosols are relatively acidic and more than 50% of sulfate is estimated to be in the form of ammonium bisulfate. No major enhancement of the organic concentration is observed during these acidic periods, which suggests that acid-catalyzed SOA formation was not an important process during this study. Size distributions of particulate sulfate, ammonium, organics, and nitrate vary on timescales of hours to days, showing unimodal, bimodal and even trimodal characteristics. The accumulation mode (peaking around 350–600 nm in vacuum aerodynamic diameter for the mass distributions) and the ultrafine mode (<100 nm) are observed most frequently. The accumulation mode is dominated by sulfate that appears to be internally mixed with oxidized organics, while combustion-emitted organics are often the main component of the ultrafine particles (except during nucleation events). The ultrafine-mode organic aerosols are mainly associated with combustion sources (likely traffic).

[1]  A. Wexler,et al.  Speciation of size-resolved individual ultrafine particles in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania , 2005 .

[2]  A. Goldstein,et al.  Submicron aerosol composition at Trinidad Head, California, during ITCT 2K2: Its relationship with gas phase volatile organic carbon and assessment of instrument performance , 2004 .

[3]  Kenneth L. Demerjian,et al.  Measurement of Ambient Aerosol Composition During the PMTACS-NY 2001 Using an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer. Part II: Chemically Speciated Mass Distributions Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[4]  D. Worsnop,et al.  Measurement of Ambient Aerosol Composition During the PMTACS-NY 2001 Using an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer. Part I: Mass Concentrations Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[5]  Andrey Khlystov,et al.  Nucleation Events During the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study: Description and Relation to Key Meteorological, Gas Phase, and Aerosol Parameters Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[6]  Allen L. Robinson,et al.  Positive and Negative Artifacts in Particulate Organic Carbon Measurements with Denuded and Undenuded Sampler Configurations Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[7]  J. Jimenez,et al.  Characterization of urban and rural organic particulate in the Lower Fraser Valley using two Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometers , 2004 .

[8]  J. Jimenez,et al.  Chemical and physical processes controlling the distribution of aerosols in the Lower Fraser Valley, Canada, during the Pacific 2001 field campaign , 2004 .

[9]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Insights into the chemistry of new particle formation and growth events in Pittsburgh based on aerosol mass spectrometry. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Kuruvilla John,et al.  The Regional Nature of PM2.5 Episodes in the Upper Ohio River Valley , 2004, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[11]  J. Jimenez,et al.  A generalised method for the extraction of chemically resolved mass spectra from aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer data , 2004 .

[12]  J. C. Cabada,et al.  Mass size distributions and size resolved chemical composition of fine particulate matter at the Pittsburgh supersite , 2004 .

[13]  Cliff I. Davidson,et al.  Pittsburgh air quality study overview , 2004 .

[14]  Charles E. Kolb,et al.  Chase Studies of Particulate Emissions from in-use New York City Vehicles , 2004 .

[15]  P. Mcmurry,et al.  Measurement of Inherent Material Density of Nanoparticle Agglomerates , 2004 .

[16]  A. Robinson,et al.  Mass balance closure and the federal reference method for PM2.5 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania , 2004 .

[17]  J. C. Cabada,et al.  Positive and negative artifacts in particulate organic carbon measurements with denuded and undenuded sampler configurations , 2004 .

[18]  D. Worsnop,et al.  Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility and Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements. Part 2: Application to Combustion-Generated Soot Aerosols as a Function of Fuel Equivalence Ratio , 2004 .

[19]  Douglas R. Worsnop,et al.  Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility and Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements. Part 1: Theory , 2004 .

[20]  A. Robinson,et al.  Spatial Variations of PM2.5 During the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study , 2004 .

[21]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Correction to “New particle formation from photooxidation of diiodomethane (CH2I2)” , 2003 .

[22]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Aircraft‐based aerosol size and composition measurements during ACE‐Asia using an Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer , 2003 .

[23]  A. Ravishankara,et al.  Applicability of the steady state approximation to the interpretation of atmospheric observations of NO3 and N2O5 , 2003 .

[24]  F. Drewnick,et al.  Intercomparison and evaluation of four semi-continuous PM2.5 sulfate instruments , 2003 .

[25]  L. Russell Aerosol organic-mass-to-organic-carbon ratio measurements. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  New particle formation from photooxidation of diiodomethane (CH2I2) , 2003 .

[27]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  A comparison of particle mass spectrometers during the 1999 Atlanta Supersite Project , 2003 .

[28]  D. Murphy,et al.  Nitrate and oxidized organic ions in single particle mass spectra during the 1999 Atlanta Supersite Project , 2003 .

[29]  Hugh Coe,et al.  Quantitative sampling using an Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer 1. Techniques of data interpretation and error analysis , 2003 .

[30]  Martin Gallagher,et al.  2. Measurements of fine particulate chemical composition in two U.K. cities , 2003 .

[31]  A. Ravishankara,et al.  Nitrogen oxides in the nocturnal boundary layer: Simultaneous in situ measurements of NO3, N2O5, NO2, NO, and O3 , 2002 .

[32]  R. Kamens,et al.  Heterogeneous Atmospheric Aerosol Production by Acid-Catalyzed Particle-Phase Reactions , 2002, Science.

[33]  M. Noguer,et al.  Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2002 .

[34]  J. C. Cabada,et al.  Sources of Atmospheric Carbonaceous Particulate Matter in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[35]  J. Watson Visibility: Science and Regulation , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[36]  J. Jimenez,et al.  Kinetics of submicron oleic acid aerosols with ozone: A novel aerosol mass spectrometric technique , 2002 .

[37]  R. Burnett,et al.  Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. , 2002, JAMA.

[38]  Joachim V. R. Heberlein,et al.  Thermal plasma deposition of nanophase hard coatings , 2001 .

[39]  Barbara J. Turpin,et al.  Species Contributions to PM2.5 Mass Concentrations: Revisiting Common Assumptions for Estimating Organic Mass , 2001 .

[40]  Kenneth A. Smith,et al.  Development of an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer for Size and Composition Analysis of Submicron Particles , 2000 .

[41]  P. Ziemann,et al.  Real-Time Chemical Analysis of Organic Aerosols Using a Thermal Desorption Particle Beam Mass Spectrometer , 2000 .

[42]  Susanne V. Hering,et al.  Method for the Automated Measurement of Fine Particle Nitrate in the Atmosphere , 2000 .

[43]  K. Prather,et al.  Mass spectrometry of aerosols. , 1999, Chemical reviews.

[44]  Stanley C. Solomon,et al.  Stratospheric ozone depletion: A review of concepts and history , 1999 .

[45]  Mahoney,et al.  In situ measurements of organics, meteoritic material, mercury, and other elements in aerosols at 5 to 19 kilometers , 1998, Science.

[46]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change , 1998 .

[47]  Kenneth A. Smith,et al.  Aerosol mass spectrometer for size and composition analysis of submicron particles , 1998 .

[48]  G. P. Wyers,et al.  THE STEAM-JET AEROSOL COLLECTOR , 1995 .

[49]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Dynamics of Tropospheric Aerosols , 1995 .

[50]  D. Dockery,et al.  An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[51]  D. Schindler,et al.  Effects of Acid Rain on Freshwater Ecosystems , 1988, Science.

[52]  J. D. Lee,et al.  Interpretation of mass spectra. , 1973, Talanta.

[53]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  New particle formation from photooxidation of diiodomethane ( CH 2 I 2 ) , 2003 .

[54]  Peter H. McMurry,et al.  A review of atmospheric aerosol measurements , 2000 .

[55]  S. Pandis,et al.  Marginal PM25: Nonlinear Aerosol Mass Response to Sulfate Reductions in the Eastern United States. , 1999, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[56]  M. Fenn,et al.  Nitrogen deposition in California forests: a review. , 1996, Environmental pollution.

[57]  Barbara J. Turpin,et al.  An in situ, time-resolved analyzer for aerosol organic and elemental carbon , 1990 .