Systems Thinking for Dealing with Wicked Sustainability Problems: Beyond Functionalist Approaches

Many of the most pressing sustainability issues are not purely technical problems. To work for sustainable development (SD) requires addressing wicked sustainability problems (WSPs), such as climate change, poverty, and resource scarcity. Previous research has shown that addressing WSPs is challenging for engineering students. In particular, students may feel overwhelmed by a WSP if they lack appropriate tools for dealing with the complexity, uncertainty, and value conflicts that are present in the situation. In this paper, we aim to investigate whether systems thinking competence (ST) can provide such a tool in engineering education for sustainable development (EESD). For this purpose, we elaborate on previous descriptions of WSPs, and draw on (E)ESD literature about ST to discuss different approaches to ST and their usefulness for addressing WSPs. We conclude that ST indeed can be valuable for addressing WSPs, but that it is necessary to be clear about how ST is defined. We suggest that mainstream approaches to ST in engineering education (EngE) are not sufficient for addressing WSPs.

[1]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development , 2011 .

[2]  Cliff Hooker,et al.  Values and Norms Between Design and Science , 2014, Design Issues.

[3]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Structure of Ill Structured Problems , 1973, Artif. Intell..

[4]  Promoting Skills,et al.  Sustainable development. , 2017, Nursing management.

[5]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Everyday Problem Solving In Engineering: Lessons For Educators , 2005 .

[6]  H. Simon,et al.  A study of how individuals solve complex and ill-structured problems , 1999 .

[7]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human problem solving: The state of the theory in 1970. , 1971 .

[8]  Timothy A. Post,et al.  Problem-Solving Skill in the Social Sciences , 1983 .

[9]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes , 1997 .

[10]  Johanna Lönngren,et al.  THESIS FOR THE DEGREE OF LICENTIATE OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION Engineering Students’ Ways of Relating to Wicked Sustainability Problems , 2014 .

[11]  Terry B. Porter,et al.  Three Views of Systems Theories and their Implications for Sustainability Education , 2009 .

[12]  Magdalena Svanström,et al.  Systems thinking for sustainable development - what does it mean and how is it formed? , 2013 .

[13]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[14]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[15]  William M. Timpson,et al.  Pedagogy for Sustainability Science: Case-Based Approaches for Interdisciplinary Instruction , 2012 .

[16]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving , 2002 .

[17]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Toward a design theory of problem solving , 2000 .

[18]  Cliff Hooker,et al.  Design, science and wicked problems , 2013 .

[19]  Richard Buchanan,et al.  Wicked Problems in Design Thinking , 1992 .

[20]  S. Connelly.  Mapping Sustainable Development as a Contested Concept , 2007 .

[21]  James F. Voss,et al.  Learning and transfer in subject-matter learning: A problem-solving model , 1987 .

[22]  K. Kitchener,et al.  Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series and Jossey-Bass Social and Behavioral Science Series. , 2009 .

[23]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators , 2006 .

[24]  Karen Strohm Kitchner.  Cognition, Metacognition, and Epistemic Cognition , 1983 .

[25]  Thomas P. Seager,et al.  Sustainable Engineering Science for Resolving Wicked Problems , 2012 .