Impact of Availability of Telehealth Programs on Documented HIV Viral Suppression: A Cluster-Randomized Program Evaluation in the Veterans Health Administration.

Background Telehealth may improve care for people with HIV who live far from HIV specialty clinics. We conducted a cluster-randomized evaluation to determine the impact of availability of HIV telehealth programs on documented viral suppression in Veterans Administration clinics. Methods In 2015-2016, people who previously traveled to HIV specialty clinics were offered telehealth visits in nearby primary care clinics. Patients were cluster-randomized to immediate telehealth availability (n = 925 patients in service areas of 13 primary care clinics offering telehealth) or availability 1 year later (n = 745 patients in 12 clinics). Measures during the evaluation year included telehealth use among patients in areas where telehealth was available and documented HIV viral suppression (viral load performed and <200 copies/mL). Impact of telehealth availability was determined using intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses that compared outcomes for patients in areas where telehealth was available with outcomes for patients where telehealth was not available, regardless of telehealth use. Complier average causal effects (CACEs) compared outcomes for telehealth users with outcomes for control patients with equal propensity to use telehealth, when available. Results Overall, 120 (13.0%) patients utilized telehealth when it was available. Availability of telehealth programs led to small improvements in viral suppression in ITT analyses (78.3% vs 74.1%; relative risk [RR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.11) and large improvements among telehealth users in CACE analyses (91.5% vs 80.0%; RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.30). Conclusions Availability of telehealth programs improved documented viral suppression. HIV clinics should offer telehealth visits for patients facing travel burdens.

[1]  K. Anderson,et al.  Physician’s Perceptions of Telemedicine in HIV Care Provision: A Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey , 2017, JMIR public health and surveillance.

[2]  Elizabeth A Stuart,et al.  Assessing the sensitivity of methods for estimating principal causal effects , 2015, Statistical methods in medical research.

[3]  P. Kaboli,et al.  Geographic access and use of infectious diseases specialty and general primary care services by veterans with HIV infection: implications for telehealth and shared care programs. , 2014, The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association.

[4]  M. Puisis,et al.  Improved virologic suppression with HIV subspecialty care in a large prison system using telemedicine: an observational study with historical controls. , 2014, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[5]  R. Valdiserri,et al.  National quality forum performance measures for HIV/AIDS care: the Department of Veterans Affairs' experience. , 2010, Archives of internal medicine.

[6]  P. Cleary,et al.  Reported care quality in federal Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program supported networks of HIV/AIDS care , 2009, AIDS care.

[7]  M. Suarez‐Almazor,et al.  Retention in care: a challenge to survival with HIV infection. , 2007, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[8]  H. Quan,et al.  Coding Algorithms for Defining Comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 Administrative Data , 2005, Medical care.

[9]  A. Zaslavsky,et al.  A National Study of the Relationship of Care Site HIV Specialization to Early Adoption of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy , 2005, Medical care.

[10]  C. Schur,et al.  Where to seek care: an examination of people in rural areas with HIV/AIDS. , 2002, The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association.